Artificial Intelligence in Online Learning: Using BERTopic to Track Research Topics and Their Evolutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v27i3.9516Keywords:
artificial intelligence, online learning, BERTopic, research topics, topic evolutionsAbstract
Artificial intelligence in online learning (AIOL) has attracted increasing attention in academia. This study applied BERTopic, a transformer-based topic modeling approach that leverages contextual embeddings, to examine the thematic structure and evolution of AIOL research. By analyzing 1,048 AIOL publications, this study sought to answer three research questions. What are the major research topics in AIOL? How have these topics evolved over time? What future research directions are recognized? Several research themes were identified, such as adaptive learning systems, sentiment analysis, and predictive analytics. Temporal analysis revealed a shift from early applications of traditional AI toward machine learning and deep learning approaches. The results also revealed an increasing emphasis on multimodal data integration for emotion recognition and personalized learning support. Based on the findings, a conceptual model has been proposed to guide AIOL research and practice by integrating four components: data, AI processing, adaptive learning, and learner development. Overall, the study offered a data-driven overview of AIOL research and demonstrated how topic modeling can be used to examine thematic development in emerging research fields.
References
Alghamdi, S., Soh, B., & Li, A. (2025). A comprehensive review of dropout prediction methods based on multivariate analysed features of MOOC platforms. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9010003
Bahari, A., & Liu, Y. (2025). AI integration in EFL teacher development: A mixed-methods evaluation of digital competency, professional trajectories, and pedagogical innovation within adaptive learning ecosystems. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2591251
Becerra, A., Cobos, R., & Lang, C. (2025). Enhancing online learning by integrating biosensors and multimodal learning analytics for detecting and predicting student behaviour: A review. Behaviour & Information Technology, 45(9), 1885–1910. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2562322
Chen, X., Cheng, G., Zou, D., Zhong, B., & Xie, H. (2023). Artificial intelligent robots for precision education: A topic modeling-based bibliometric analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0013
Chen, X., Li, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. (2025). Metacognition research in education: Topic modeling and bibliometrics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 1399–1427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10451-8
Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education: Contributors, collaborations, research topics, challenges, and future directions. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647028
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. H., Tu, Y. F., & Yang, K. H. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7526
Dağhan, G., & Gündüz, A. Y. (2022). Research trends in educational technology journals between 2000 and 2018: A Web scraping study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5179–5214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10762-2
Daniel, K., Msambwa, M. M., Antony, F., & Wan, X. (2024). Motivate students for better academic achievement: A systematic review of blended innovative teaching and its impact on learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(4), e22733. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22733
Dogan, M. E., Goru Dogan, T., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in online learning and distance education processes: A systematic review of empirical studies. Applied Sciences, 13(5), 3056. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053056
Gardner, J., O’Leary, M., & Yuan, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence in educational assessment:‘Breakthrough? Or buncombe and ballyhoo?’ Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1207–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12577
Grootendorst, M. (2022). BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.05794
Ilić, M., Mikić, V., Kopanja, L., & Vesin, B. (2023). Intelligent techniques in e-learning: A literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(12), 14907–14953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10508-1
Jin, S. H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023). Supporting students’ self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5
Karakaya, K. (2021). Design considerations in emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A human-centered approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09884-0
Kim, Y., & Kumi-Yeboah, A. (2025). Strategies to promote self-regulated learning for online diverse students. Distance Education, 46(2), 272–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2024.2358855
Lampropoulos, G. (2025). Augmented reality, virtual reality, and intelligent tutoring systems in education and training: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3223. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063223
Liu, C., Zou, D., Chen, X., Xie, H., & Chan, W. H. (2021). A bibliometric review on latent topics and trends of the empirical MOOC literature (2008–2019). Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(3), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09692-y
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N., & Großberger, L. (2018). UMAP: Uniform manifold approximation and projection. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(29), 861. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00861
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
Munir, H., Vogel, B., & Jacobsson, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches in digital education: A systematic revision. Information, 13(4), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13040203
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Park, Y., & Doo, M. Y. (2024). Role of AI in blended learning: A systematic literature review. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(1), 164–196. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7566
Qazi, S., Kadri, M. B., Naveed, M., Khawaja, B. A., Khan, S. Z., Alam, M. M., & Su’ud, M. M. (2024). AI-driven learning management systems: Modern developments, challenges and future trends during the age of ChatGPT. Computers, Materials & Continua, 80(2), 3289–3314. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2024.048893
Ruyang, L., Lu, T., Mengyao, X., & Hedi, Y. (2025). Contemporary trends of AI-powered foreign language teaching: A systematic literature review from connectivism perspective. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2586144
Sharma, P., Akgun, M., & Li, Q. (2024). Understanding student interaction and cognitive engagement in online discussions using social network and discourse analyses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(5), 2631–2654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10261-w
Shi, S., & Zhang, H. (2025). EFL students’ motivation predicted by their self-efficacy and resilience in artificial intelligence (AI)-based context: From a self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 91, 102151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102151
Sjølie, E., Espenes, T. C., & Buø, R. (2022). Social interaction and agency in self-organizing student teams during their transition from face-to-face to online learning. Computers & Education, 189, 104580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104580
Torres-Vergara, C. J., Alfaro-García, V. G., Merigó, J. M., Atif, A., & McGreal, R. (2025). Twenty-five years of the International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: A bibliometric analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(2), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i2.8662
Tram, N. H. M., Nguyen, T. T., & Tran, C. D. (2024). ChatGPT as a tool for self-learning English among EFL learners: a multi-methods study. System, 127, 103528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103528
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.




