Building a Framework to Guide the Design and Development of Open Educational Practices for the Digital Training of University Professors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v27i3.9420Keywords:
teacher digital competence, open educational resources, OER, theoretical framework, open educational practices, OEPAbstract
In the context of widespread digitalization in higher education, enhancing teacher digital competence (TDC) has become a critical priority. However, institutional efforts to advance TDC, including the development of open educational resources (OER), are often hindered by the prevalence of training models that lack pedagogical depth and rely on transmissive methods. Current literature on open educational practices (OEP) has highlighted the transformative potential of openness in teaching, yet it also suggests a disconnect between the availability of resources and their actual adoption. Building upon this gap, this article describes the creation of a theoretical framework intended to guide the design of OER-based training that effectively integrates OEP for faculty development. The method employed was a qualitative, exploratory approach, constituting the first phase of a design-based research (DBR) project. The framework was constructed in two stages: first, defining its conceptual foundations through a rigorous literature review, and second, validating and refining these elements through input from experts in educational technology. The primary result is a validated theoretical framework for OER-based digital training. The conclusions emphasize that this framework is distinct from others because it serves as a meta-reflective element, focusing directly on the teacher’s own professional development and practice, rather than only on student-facing teaching processes. While the framework can guide institutional digital transformation, its initial design was developed within a specific university context, following the DBR approach. Future research will involve implementing, revising, and validating the framework in other contexts.
References
Al Albri, M. H., Bannan, B., & Dabbagh, N. (2022). The design and development of an open educational resources intervention in a college course that manifests in open educational practices: A design‐based research study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34, 154–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09285-z
Allman, B., Kimmons, R., Dickson-Deane, C., Bozkurt, A., Warr, M., Stefaniak, J., & Dash, M., & Bondah, F. E. (2024). EdTechnica: A vision of an educational publishing community of practice that is accessible, flexible, and just. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00466-1
Bakker, A. (2018). Design research in education: A practical guide for early career researchers. Taylor & Francis.
Bartolic, S. K., Boud, D., Agapito, J., Verpoorten, D., Williams, S., Lutze-Mann, L., Matzat, U., Moreno, M. M., Polly, P., Tai, J., Marsh, H. L., Lin, L., Burgess, J. L., Habtu, S., Rodrigo, M. M. M., Roth, M., Heap, T., & Guppy, N. (2022). A multi-institutional assessment of changes in higher education teaching and learning in the face of COVID-19. Educational Review, 74(3), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.202 1.1955830
Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L.-A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Blomgren, C. (2018). OER awareness and use: The affinity between higher education and K–12. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3431
Booth, A., Sutton A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2022). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE.
Bournissen, J., Tumino, M. C., & Carrión, F. (2019). MOOC: Evaluación y medición de la calidad percibida [MOOC: Evaluation and measurement of perceived quality]. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 11, 18–32. https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/2899/2946
Brandenburger, B. (2022). A multidimensional and analytical perspective on Open Educational Practices in the 21st century. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 990675. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.990675
Buils, S., Viñoles-Cosentino, V., Esteve-Mon, F. M., & Sánchez-Tarazaga, L. (2024). Digital training in university teaching induction programmes in Spain: A comparative analysis based on DigComp and DigCompEdu. Educación XX1, 27(2), 37-64. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.38652
Castañeda, L., Esteve, F. & Adell, J. (2018). ¿Por qué es necesario repensar la competencia docente para el mundo digital? [Why rethinking teaching competence for the digital world?]. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 56(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/56/6
Castañeda, L., Vanaclocha, N., Velasco Pérez, J. R., Ruiz Martínez,, P. M., Hartillo Hermoso, M. I., Pereira González, E., & Ruiz Martínez, A. (2023). Marco de competencia digital docente universitario. Creación y validación [Framework of digital competence for university teachers. Creation and validation]. Proyecto UNIDIGITAL DigCompEdu-FYA. http://hdl.handle.net/10201/136836
Castañeda, L., Viñoles, V., Concannon, F., Pedersen, A., Al-Hmiedat, P., & Lobato, N. (2024). The CUTE CANVAS: developing a design tool for planning strategic actions for institutional of digital competencies. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2167274
Cisterna, F. (2005). Categorización y triangulación como procesos de validación del conocimiento en investigación cualitativa [Categorization and triangulation as knowledge validation processes in qualitative research]. Theoria, 14(1), 61–71.
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning (JALT), 3(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
Cronin, C., & MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis, 10(2), p. 127–143. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.825
de Almeida Sousa, J., & Amiel, T. (2023). Prácticas Educativas Abiertas desde la perspectiva de educadores abiertos: Aportaciones a la formación del profesorado [Open educational practices from the perspective of open educators: Contributions to teacher professional development]. Edutec, Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, 85, 85–102. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2023.85.2853
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2020). Linking learner factors, teaching context, and engagement patterns with MOOC learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 688–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12437
Esteve-Mon, F. M., Postigo, A. Y., & Castañeda, L. (2023). A strategic approach of the crucial elements for the implementation of digital tools and processes in Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(3), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12411
European Commission. (2020). Digital education action plan 2021–2027. Resetting education and training for the digital age. https://ec.europa.eu/education/sites/education/files/document-library-docs/deap-communication-sept2020_en.pdf
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Corell, A. (2020). La COVID-19: ¿enzima de la transformación digital de la docencia o reflejo de una crisis metodológica y competencial en la educación superior? [COVID-19: The enzyme of the digital transformation of teaching or the reflection of a methodological and competence crisis in higher education?]. Campus Virtuales, 9(2), 83–98. http://uajournals.com/ojs/index.php/campusvirtuales/article/view/740
Hidalgo, M. (2024). Análisis del concepto de Competencia Digital Docente: una revisión sistemática de la literatura [Analysis of the concept of Digital Teaching Competence: A systematic literature review]. RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.23.1.25
Hoadley, C., & Campos, F. C. (2022). Design-based research: What it is and why it matters to studying online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2079128
Inamorato dos Santos, A. (2019). Practical guidelines on open education for academics: Modernising higher education via open educational practices. European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/55923
Inamorato dos Santos, A., Chinkes, E., Carvalho, M. A. G., Solórzano, C. M. V., & Marroni, L. S. (2023). The digital competence of academics in higher education: Is the glass half empty or half full? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00376-0
Koseoglu, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2018). An exploratory literature review on open educational practices. Distance Education, 39(4), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042
Koseoglu, S., Bozkurt, A., & Havemann, L. (2020). Critical questions for open educational practices. Distance Education, 41(2), 153–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1775341
Lemos de Carvalho, G., Jr., Cebrián Robles, D., Cebrián De La Serna, M., & Raposo Rivas, M. (2019). Comparative study SPOC vs. MOOC for socio-technical contents from usability and user satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(2) 4–20. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.557726
Mas Torelló, Ò. (2011). El profesor universitario: Sus competencias y formación [The university teacher: His competences and his training]. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 15(3), 195–211. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=56722230013
McBride, M. & Abramovich, S. (2022). Crossing the boundaries through OER adoption: Considering open educational resources (OER) as boundary objects in higher education. Library & Information Science Research, 44(2), Article 101154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101154
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic review of design-based research progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? Educational Researcher, 42(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463781
Mercader, C., & Gairín, J. (2020). University teachers’ perception of barriers to the use of digital technologies: The importance of academic discipline. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0182-x
Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A. & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112
Paskevicius, M. (2017). Conceptualizing open educational practices through the lens of constructive alignment. Open Praxis, 9(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.519
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.) (2009). An introduction to educational design research. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO). https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/14472302/Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf
Redecker, C., & Punie Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Rué Domingo, J. (2015). El desarrollo profesional docente en Educación Superior: agenda, referentes y propuestas para su adopción [The professional development in teaching in higher education: Agenda, its frame and proposals for its adoption]. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 13(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2015.5461
Sánchez-Caballé, A., Llopis-Nebot, M.A., & Esteve-Mon, F.M. (2025). Analysis of Digital Competence and Digital Teaching Competence Training Platform Designed by Five Valencian Universities. In E. Trepulè (Ed.), EDEN Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 150-151).
Sánchez-Tarazaga, L., Ruiz-Bernardo, P., Viñoles Cosentino, V., & Esteve-Mon, F. M. (2022). University teaching induction programmes: A systematic literature review. Professional Development in Education, 50(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2022.2147577
Stagg, A. (2014). OER adoption: A continuum for practice. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 11(3), 151–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i3.2102
Stenalt, M. H., Johnson, M. W., & Aagaard, J. (2023). Reclaiming the teacher perspective in digital education – An analysis of university teachers’ agency. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4109–4121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2194930.
Tlili, A., Garzón, J., Salha, S., Huang, R., Xu, L., Burgos, D., Denden, M., Farrel, O., Farrow, R., Bozkurt, A., Amiel, T., McGreal, R., López-Serrano, A & Wiley, D. (2023). Are open educational resources (OER) and practices (OEP) effective in improving learning achievement? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00424-3
UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries. Final report. https://r.issu.edu.do/n2
UNESCO. (2012). Declaración de París de 2012 sobre los REA [2012 Paris OER declaration]. Congreso Mundial sobre los Recursos Educativos Abiertos (REA). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246687_spa
UNESCO. (2019). Recommendation on open educational resources (OER). https://r.issu.edu.do/mWf
Van den Akker, J. J. H., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364
Viñoles Cosentino, V., Esteve-Mon, F. M., & Adell-Segura, J. (2025). Design and development of a digital transformation plan for a Spanish university based on an EDR process. UTE. Teaching & Technology, Universitas Tarraconsensis, 2025(2). https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2025.4161
Viñoles-Cosentino, V., Sánchez-Caballé, A. y Esteve-Mon, F.M. (2022). Desarrollo de la competencia digital docente en contextos universitarios. Una revisión sistemática. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 20(2). http://doi.org/10.15366/reice2022.20.2.001
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
Weller, M. (2013). The battle for open—A perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(3), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-15
Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. L., III (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
Zou, R., Jiang, L., & Wider, W. (2025). Bibliometric insights into the open education landscape. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(1), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i1.7953
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.




