Knowledge Marketplaces: An Analysis of the Influence of Business Models on Instructors’ Motivations and Strategies

  • Matthieu Tenzing Cisel Institut Des Humanités Numériques, CY Cergy Paris Université http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1556-5077
  • David Pontalier Centre de Recherches Interdisciplinaires, Université de Paris
Keywords: marketplace, MOOC, instructor, content analysis

Abstract

Unlike MOOC platforms such as Coursera or edX, which typically partner with institutions of higher education, online knowledge marketplaces allow anyone to broadcast courses and charge for them. In this article, we investigate, through a mixed-method approach, the motivations and strategies of the instructors of Udemy and Skillshare. Semi-structured interviews and a quantitative analysis of the characteristics of Skillshare’s courses, obtained using a Web scraper, suggest that while a significant proportion of the marketplace’s instructors are outreach driven, the majority are income driven. They develop strategies to maximize their revenues, notably by adapting the characteristics of their courses, such as the number of videos, to the business model of the platform. Courses are shorter on Skillshare than on Udemy, where instructors’ incomes are proportional to the number of registrations. We hypothesize that the latter platform’s business model incentivizes instructors to create longer courses in order to attract wider audiences.

 

References

Cisel, M. (2016). Utilisation des MOOC : éléments de typologie [Uses of MOOCs : a typology]. (Doctoral dissertation, ENS Paris-Saclay). https://www.theses.fr/197356915

Cisel, M. (2018). Une analyse automatisée des modalités d’évaluation dans les MOOC [An automated analysis of assessment methods in MOOCs]. International Journal of e-learning and Distance Education, 33(1).

Cisel, M. (2019). The structure of the MOOC ecosystem as revealed by course aggregators. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(3), 212-227.

Choy, M., & Tay, B. (2016). Meeting the upskilling demands of the Singapore workforce through MOOCs: A white paper by Udemy and Dioworks Learning. Dioworks Learning. http://www.als2016.com/content/pdf/1.5%20Michael%20Choy.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed-methods research. Sage.

Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2(3), Article 18. http://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2017). Understanding learning and teaching in MOOCs from the perspectives of students and instructors: A review of literature from 2014 to 2016. In C. Delgado Kloos, P. Jermann, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, D. T. Seaton, & S. White (Eds.), Digital education: Out to the world and back to the campus. EMOOCs 2017. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 176–181). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_20

Doo, M., Tang, Y., Bonk, C. J., & Zhu, M. (2020). MOOC instructor motivation and career development. Distance Education, 41(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1724770

Evans, S., & Myrick, J. G. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 36(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736

Haavind, S., & Sistek-Chandler, C. (2015). The emergent role of the MOOC instructor: A qualitative study of trends toward improving future practice. International Journal on E-Learning, 14(3), 331–350. http://www.learntechlib.org/p/150663/

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001

Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses, fall 2012–summer 2013. SSRN, Article 2381263. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381263

Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 341-358. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112

Koller, D. (2015, October 19). An update on assessments, grades, and certification. Coursera Blog. https://coursera.tumblr.com/post/131520811622/an-update-on-assessments-grades-and

Kolowich, S. (2013, March 18). The professors behind the MOOC hype. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905

Lin, J., & Cantoni, L. (2018). Decision, implementation, and confirmation : Experiences of instructors behind tourism and hospitality MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3402

Lowenthal, P., Snelson, C., & Perkins, R. (2018). Teaching massive, open, online, courses (MOOCs): Tales from the front line. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 19(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3505

Mardan, A. (2018). Using your Web skills to make money: Secrets of a successful online course creator and other income strategies that really work. Apress.

Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005

Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html

Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2021). Online education and the COVID-19 outbreak : A case study of online teaching during lockdown. Education Sciences, 11(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020072

Radford, A. W., Robles, J., Cataylo, S., Horn, L., Thornton, J., & Whitfield, K. E. (2014). The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1842

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective : Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Skillshare (2016, December 15). An upcoming change to the teacher payments model. Skillshare Blog. https://www.skillshare.com/blog/an-upcoming-change-to-the-teacher-payments-model-1

Stupnisky, R., Brckalorenz, A., Yuhas, B., & Guay, F. (2018). Faculty members’ motivation for teaching and best practices : Testing a model based on self-determination theory across institution types. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.004

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed-methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage.

Tovar, E., Dimovska, A., Piedra, N., & Chicaiza, J. (2013). OCW-S: Enablers for building sustainable open education evolving OCW and MOOC. In O. Pfeiffer, M. E. Auer, & M. Llama (Eds.), Proceedings of IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON 2013) (pp. 1262–1271). IEEE. http://www.doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530269

Udemy (2019, January 23). Course quality checklist. https://teach.udemy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Quality-Standards.pdf

Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013–2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448

Willerer, T. (2016, October 31). Introducing subscriptions for specializations. Coursera Blog.

https://blog.coursera.org/introducing-subscriptions-for-specializations/

Witkin, P. (2018, December 17). Udemy’s 2018 year in review. Udemy. https://about.udemy.com/udemy-news/udemys-2018-year-in-review/

Woodley, A., & Simpson, O. (2014). Student dropout: The elephant in the room. In O. Zawacki-Richter, & T. Anderson (Eds.), Online distance education: Towards a research agenda (pp. 455–489). Athabasca University Press.

Zheng, S., Wisniewski, P., Rosson, M., & Carroll, J. M. (2016). Ask the instructors: Motivations and challenges of teaching massive open online courses. In D. Gergle (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW 2016 (pp. 206–221). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820082

Zhu, M., Bonk, C., & Sari, A. (2019). Massive open online course instructor motivations, innovations, and designs : Surveys, interviews, and course reviews. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue Canadienne de L’Apprentissage et de la Technologie, 45(1). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208592/

Zhu, M., Sari, A. R., & Lee, M. M. (2020). A comprehensive systematic review of MOOC research: Research techniques, topics, and trends from 2009 to 2019. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1685–1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09798-x

Published
2021-04-27
How to Cite
Cisel, M. T., & Pontalier, D. (2021). Knowledge Marketplaces: An Analysis of the Influence of Business Models on Instructors’ Motivations and Strategies. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(3), 142-158. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5459
Section
Research Notes