MOOCs Reshaping Undergraduate Health Education: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v27i1.8568Keywords:
MOOCs, undergraduate health education, medical education, systematic review, educational evaluation, clinical skillsAbstract
Given the growing demand for flexible and accessible health education, massive open online courses (MOOCs) have been recognized as instrumental in expanding undergraduate learning. This systematic review was conducted to investigate the use of MOOCs in undergraduate health education, focusing on publication trends, geographic distribution, and key research variables. A total of 31 peer-reviewed articles were reviewed, and data were sourced from six international databases: Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, EBSCOHost, ScienceDirect, and PubMed. It was found that MOOCs have been integrated into undergraduate health education since 2014, with a notable increase in publications observed after 2022. The highest number of studies was published in China. Student satisfaction was identified as the most frequently studied variable, and medical education was reported as the dominant field. Quantitative research were predominantly used, with sample sizes between 101 and 300 participants. Questionnaires were commonly employed as a data collection tool, and many studies were based on custom-developed MOOCs for their research. Courses were typically between 4 and 6 weeks duration. Improved clinical skills were frequently reported as outcomes, while the lack of practical experience in MOOC-based learning was identified as a major limitation. More practice-oriented teaching approaches were recommended by most studies. To enhance the effectiveness of MOOCs in health education, more innovative and practical implementation strategies are needed. Future research is encouraged to address these gaps and strengthen the impact of MOOCs on undergraduate health programs. The growing role of MOOCs in health education is highlighted, particularly the need to integrate practical components for greater educational impact.
References
Almeda, M. V., Zuech, J., Utz, C., Higgins, G., Reynolds, R., & Baker, R. S. (2018). Comparing the factors that predict completion and grades among for-credit and open/MOOC students in online learning. Online Learning, 22(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1060
Alturkistani, A., Car, J., Majeed, A., Brindley, D., Wells, G., & Meinert, E. (2018). Determining the effectiveness of a massive open online course in data science for health. In 12th International Conference on e-Learning 2018 (pp. 27–36), Madrid, Spain. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590297.pdf
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Barteit, S., Guzek, D., Jahn, A., Bärnighausen, T., Jorge, M. M., & Neuhann, F. (2020). Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 145, 103726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726
Barteit, S., Sié, A., Yé, M., Depoux, A., Louis, V. R., & Sauerborn, R. (2019). Lessons learned on teaching a global audience with massive open online courses (MOOCs) on health impacts of climate change: a commentary. Globalization and Health, 15, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0494-6
Bettiol, S., Psereckis, R., & MacIntyre, K. (2022). A perspective of massive open online courses (MOOCs) and public health. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1058383
Clark, K. R., Vealé, B. L., & Watts, L. K. (2017). A review of the use of massive open online courses (MOOCs) in medical imaging education. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 15(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580X/2017.1659
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Cook, D. A., Levinson, A. J., Garside, S., Dupras, D. M., Erwin, P. J., & Montori, V. M. (2010). Instructional design variations in Internet-based learning for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine, 85(5), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d6c319
Cui, S. (2022). Analysis and quality improvement research of MOOC. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education (pp. 193–199). https://doi.org/10.1145/3568739.3568772
de Leeuw, R., De Soet, A., Van Der Horst, S., Walsh, K., Westerman, M., & Scheele, F. (2019). How we evaluate postgraduate medical e-learning: Systematic review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(1), e13128. https://doi.org/10.2196/13128
Dedeilia, A., Sotiropoulos, M. G., Hanrahan, J., Janga, D., Dedeilias, P., & Sideris, M. (2020). Medical and surgical education challenges and innovations in the COVID-19 era: A systematic review. In Vivo, 34, 1603–1611. https://doi.org/10.21873/INVIVO.11950
Delungahawatta, T., Dunne, S. S., Hyde, S., Halpenny, L., McGrath, D., O’Regan, A., & Dunne, C. P. (2022). Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 711. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1
Dolores-Maldonado, G., Cañari-Casaño, J. L., Montero-Romainville, R., & Malaga, G. (2021). Massive open online course (MOOC) opportunities in health education (HE) in a mandatory social isolation context. F1000Research, 10. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52049.2
Eglseer, D. (2023). Development and evaluation of a massive open online course (MOOC) for healthcare professionals on malnutrition in older adults. Nurse Education Today, 123, 105741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105741
Gao, J., Yang, L., Zou, J., & Fan, X. (2021). Comparison of the influence of massive open online courses and traditional teaching methods in medical education in China: A meta‐analysis. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49(4), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21523
Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263
Goh, W., Ayub, E., Wong, S. Y., & Lim, C. L. (2017). The importance of teacher’s presence and engagement in MOOC learning environment: A case study. In 2017 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (pp. 127-132). https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e.2017.8409250
Gong, Z. (2018). The development of medical MOOCs in China: Current situation and challenges. Medical Education Online, 23(1), 1527624. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1527624
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. Sage.
Guerrero-Quiñonez, A. J., Bedoya-Flores, M. C., Mosquera-Quiñonez, E. F., Ango-Ramos, E. D., & Lara-Tambaco, R. M. (2023). The MOOC as an alternative model for university education. Ibero-American Journal of Education & Society Research, 3(1), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoeds.v3i1.630
Guo, Y. (2014). MOOCs and the future of China’s higher education. Journal of Higher Education Management, 8(5), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.2014.05.002
Hauer, K. E., Chang, A., van Schaik, S. M., Lucey, C., Cowell, T., & Teherani, A. (2023). It’s all about the trust and building a foundation: Evaluation of a longitudinal medical student coaching program. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 35(5), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2022.2111570
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). Why do institutions offer MOOCs? Online Learning, 18(3), n3. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i3.464
Hopcan, S., Polat, E., & Albayrak, E. (2024). Research trends in e-learning practices for postgraduate medical education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 5921–5945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12035-6
Iniesto, F., McAndrew, P., Minocha, S., & Coughlan, T. (2016). Accessibility of MOOCs: Understanding the provider perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.430
Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112
Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2018). Can learning analytics find success in didactical measurements? Results from a MOOC case study. In D. Ifenthaler (Ed.), Digital workplace learning: Bridging formal and informal learning with digital technologies (pp. 211–225). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8_12
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2013). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
Kizilcec, R. F., & Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699735
Kononowicz, A. A., Berman, A. H., Stathakarou, N., McGrath, C., Bartyński, T., Nowakowski, P., Malawski, M., & Zary, N. (2015). Virtual patients in a behavioral medicine massive open online course (MOOC): A case-based analysis of technical capacity and user navigation pathways. JMIR Medical Education, 1(2), e8. https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.4394
Kucuk, S., Aydemir, M., Yildirim, G., Arpacik, O., & Goktas, Y. (2013). Educational technology research trends in Turkey from 1990 to 2011. Computers & Education, 68, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.016
Lahti, M., Hätönen, H., & Välimäki, M. (2014). Impact of e-learning on nurses’ and student nurses knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(1), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.017
Laurillard, D., & Kennedy, E. (2017). The potential of MOOCs for learning at scale in the Global South. Center for Global Higher Education, 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5287/ora-gagqxyjje
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., & Williams, S. A. (2014). Massive open online courses on health and medicine. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(8), e191. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3439
Longhini, J., De Colle, B., Rossettini, G., & Palese, A. (2021). What knowledge is available on massive open online courses in nursing and academic healthcare sciences education? A rapid review. Nurse Education Today, 99, 104812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104812
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
Martín-Valero, R., Pastora-Bernal, J. M., Ortiz-Ortigosa, L., Casuso-Holgado, M. J., Pérez-Cabezas, V., & Ruiz-Párraga, G. T. (2021). The usefulness of a massive open online course about postural and technological adaptations to enhance academic performance and empathy in health sciences undergraduates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010672
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Naciri, A., Radid, M., Kharbach, A., & Chemsi, G. (2021). E-learning in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.27
Nieder, J., Nayna Schwerdtle, P., Sauerborn, R., & Barteit, S. (2022). Massive open online courses for health worker education in low-and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 891987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.891987
Nwameme, A., Dako-Gyeke, P., Asampong, E., Allotey, P., Reidpath, D. D., Certain, E., Vahedi, M., Ross, B., Maher, D., & Launois, P. (2023). Improving understanding of disease control implementation research through a MOOC with participants from low-and middle-income countries: Evaluating participant reactions and learning. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 17(3), e0011139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011139
Olivares Olivares, S. L., Hernández, R. I. E., Corolla, M. L. T., Alvarez, J. P. N., & Sánchez-Mendiola, M. (2021). MOOC learning assessment in clinical settings: Analysis from quality dimensions. Medical Science Educator, 31(2), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01178-7
Pouladi, E., Yazdi, M. T., Salehi, M., & Moradi, S. (2023). Use of massive online open courses (MOOCs) model in virtual education development in first macro-region universities of medical sciences in countrywide territorial planning. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 12, 326. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1221_22
Regmi, K., & Jones, L. (2020). A systematic review of the factors—enablers and barriers—affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6
Rowe, M., Osadnik, C. R., Pritchard, S., & Maloney, S. (2019). These may not be the courses you are seeking: a systematic review of open online courses in health professions education. BMC Medical Education, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1774-9
Rulinawaty, R., Priyanto, A., Kuncoro, S., Rahmawaty, D., & Wijaya, A. (2023). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) as catalysts of change in education during unprecedented times: A narrative review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(Special issue), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6697
Schettino, G., & Capone, V. (2022). Learning design strategies in MOOCs for physicians’ training: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114247
Setia, S., Tay, J. C., Chia, Y. C., & Subramaniam, K. (2019). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) for continuing medical education: Why and how? Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 2019(10), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S219104
Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396
Vissenberg, J., d’Haenens, L., & Livingstone, S. (2022). Digital literacy and online resilience as facilitators of young people’s wellbeing? A systematic review. European Psychologist, 27(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000478
Yang, L., Zou, J., Gao, J., & Fan, X. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of massive open online courses on improving clinical skills in medical education in China: A meta-analysis. Heliyon, 9(8), e19263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19263
Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. CETIS. https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/619735/
Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014–2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.002
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
