Enhancing Team Performance in Hybrid-Flexible Courses: The Role of Team Communication and Atmosphere
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i4.8407Keywords:
input-process-output theory, team atmosphere, team communication, team performance, hybrid-flexible courseAbstract
ybrid-flexible (hyflex) courses have become a prominent open and distributed learning (ODL) approach post-COVID-19, offering students the flexibility to attend classes online, in-person, or both. While this model promotes instructional continuity and student-centered learning, it presents unique ODL challenges in managing effective team collaboration. This quantitative study investigated the underexplored relationships among effective communication, team atmosphere, and team performance in hyflex learning environments; the study sought to provide novel insights into optimizing team dynamics and enhancing learning outcomes in ODL-integrated educational settings. The study comprised data from 310 college students enrolled in the authors’ hyflex course offered on China’s Super Star learning platform at an ODL institution with over 700 million registered users. An online survey was conducted using validated scales; confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and multiple linear regression analyses were used to test the hypotheses. The study found effective communication significantly enhanced team performance (β = 0.389, p < .001). Team atmosphere moderated this relationship (β = -0.118, p < .05); while a positive atmosphere generally supported performance, an overly positive one may have reduced the critical engagement necessary for optimal outcomes. The study concluded that both effective communication and a balanced team atmosphere were critical for maximizing team performance in hyflex courses. We suggest ODL educators foster communication strategies that encourage open dialogue and critical thinking while maintaining a supportive team environment. Overemphasis on maintaining positivity may hinder constructive critique and diminish performance in distance and hybrid settings.
References
Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2293
Al-Rahmi, W., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2015). The role of social media for collaborative learning to improve academic performance of students and researchers in Malaysian higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2326
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. J. (1989). On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378902600302
Baker, D. P., Day, R., & Salas, E. (2006). Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations. Health Services Research, 41(4p2), 1576–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00566.x
Beatty, B. J. (2019). Hybrid-Flexible course design: Implementing student-directed hybrid classes. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex
Bockorny, K. M., Giannavola, T. M., Mathew, S., & Walters, H. D. (2024). Effective engagement strategies in hyflex modality based on intrinsic motivation in students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 25(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231161364
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Borup, J., Jensen, M., Archambault, L., Short, C. R., & Graham, C. R. (2020). Supporting students during COVID-19: Developing and leveraging academic communities of engagement in a time of crisis. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.70725/150472phreji
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006
Bozkurt, A. (2019). From distance education to open and distance learning: A holistic evaluation of history, definitions, and theories. In Handbook of research on learning in the age of transhumanism (pp. 252–273). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8431-5.ch016
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Brown, M. (2024). Enhancing “hyflex” instruction: Best practices, criticisms, and results from a case study in graduate education. International Journal of Studies in Education and Science, 5(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijses.81
Cumming, T. M., Gilanyi, L., & Han, C. (2024). Hyflex delivery mode in a postgraduate course: Instructor and student perspectives. Discover Education, 3(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00110-0
Detyna, M., Sanchez-Pizani, R., Giampietro, V., Dommett, E. J., & Dyer, K. (2023). Hybrid flexible (hyflex) teaching and learning: Climbing the mountain of implementation challenges for synchronous online and face-to-face seminars during a pandemic. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09408-y
Fan, L., Yang, J., & Shi, J. (2017). The influence of female leadership characteristics on employee performance: Based on the mediating effect of team climate. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 14(4), 34–43. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1867.F.20170629.1654.016
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group dynamics (6th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Galperin, B. L. (2003). Can workplace deviance be constructive? In A. Sagie, S. Stashevsky, & M. Koslowsky (Eds.), Misbehavior and dysfunctional attitudes in organizations (pp. 154–170). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288829
Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons. https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1065292ar
González-Romá, V., Fortes-Ferreira, L., & Peiró, J. M. (2009). Team climate, climate strength and team performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(3), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X370025
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18(3), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 45–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60248-8
Hadjipieris, P. A. (2024). Hyflex course design: Exploring student experiences of an equity-centered technology enhanced curriculum. A qualitative case study [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego]. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/js956p80v
He, J., Jiang, X., & Yu, G. (2014). Coupling relations of collective efficacy and team performance: The moderating role of team communication. Science and Technology Management Research, 34(04), 169–173.
Heilporn, G., & Lakhal, S. (2021). Converting a graduate-level course into a hyflex modality: What are effective engagement strategies? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454
Höddinghaus, M., Nohe, C., & Hertel, G. (2023). Leadership in virtual work settings: What we know, what we do not know, and what we need to do. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33(2), 188–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2023.2250079
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068300400409
Huang, Q. (2011). Research on the influencing mechanism of transformational leadership on team performance. [Doctoral dissertation, Wuhan University of Technology]. China National Knowledge Infrastructure.
Jarwati. (2024). Book Review: IDEAL Distance Education and Blended Learning Handbook (8th ed.) authored by Vanek, J., Simpson, D., Harris, J., & Goumas, J. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(1), 157-159, https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7253
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/454
Kanaris, M. E., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2023). Trust shaping the social relationship of diverse learners in the online education environment. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i2.2197
Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 61, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.003
Keshavarz, M. (2023). Hybrid-Flexible course design: Implementing student-directed hybrid classes. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 24(1), 83-86.
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2021). Adopting hyflex in higher education in response to COVID-19: Students’ perspectives. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1906641
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235
Lohmann, M. J., Randolph, K. M., & Oh, J. H. (2021). Classroom management strategies for hyflex instruction: Setting students up for success in the hybrid environment. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(5), 807–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01201-5
Lyons, E. (2024). Teaching and social presence in hyflex classrooms: Setting the climate for effective group cohesion [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Windsor.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
Martin, F., Wu, T., Wan, L., & Xie, K. (2022). A meta-analysis on the community of inquiry presences and learning outcomes in online and blended learning environments. Online Learning, 26(1), 325–359. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.2604
Mathieu, J. E., Gilson, L. L., & Ruddy, T. M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.97
Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Students’ online interaction, self-regulation, and learning engagement in higher education: The importance of social presence to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 815220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815220
Miller, J., Risser, M., & Griffiths, R. (2013). Student choice, instructor flexibility: Moving beyond the blended instructional model. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 1(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.2458/AZU_ITET_V1I1_16464
Moore, M. G. (2013). The theory of transactional distance. In Handbook of distance education (pp. 66–85). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738
Murray, S. C. (1983). [Review of the book Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. By I. L. Janis]. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 13(4). 654-656. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27547987
O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
Penrod, J. M. (2023). Considerations for implementing and supporting hybrid and hyflex learning in a higher education institution. Ohio University.
Priem, R. L., Harrison, D. A., & Muir, N. K. (1995). Structured conflict and consensus outcomes in group decision making. Journal of Management, 21(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(95)90006-3
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371–2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23, 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
Razali, S. N., Shahbodin, F., Hussin, H., & Bakar, N. (2015). Factors affecting the effective online collaborative learning environment. In Pattern analysis, intelligent security and the Internet of Things (pp. 215–224). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17398-6_20
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134
Sargeant, J., Loney, E., & Murphy, G. (2008). Effective interprofessional teams: “Contact is not enough” to build a team. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28(4), 228–234. https://doi.org10.1002/chp.189
Thurnau, L., & Byun, J. (2022). HyFlex: A hybrid model providing flexibility for learners. C2C Digital Magazine, 1(17), 7. https://scholarsspace.jccc.edu/c2c_online/vol1/iss17/7
Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499845
Vetrivel, S. C., & Mohanasundaram, T. (2024). Beyond the blackboard: Embracing hybrid learning spaces. In Global perspectives on micro-learning and micro-credentials in higher education (pp. 10–28). IGI Global. https://doi.org10.4018/979-8-3693-0343-6.ch002
Wang, H. (2008). The study on influence between the team process and the team effectiveness. [Doctoral dissertation, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics].
Wilson, T. J., & Alexander, M. (2021). HyFlex course delivery: Addressing the change in course modality brought on by the pandemic. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 25(2), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.26522/jiste.v25i2.3668
Wong, B. T., Li, K. C., Chan, H. T., & Cheung, S. K. (2023). HyFlex learning research and practice: A longitudinal analysis. Sustainability, 15(12), 9699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129699
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778
Zhang, Y., & Li, D. (2024). Enhancing project performance through effective team communication: A comprehensive study integrating project management quotient, trust, and management information systems. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 9(1), 25574. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.14317
Zheng, B. (2006). A study of the mechanism within leadership style, organizational citizenship behavior and team performance. [Master’s thesis, Zhejiang University].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
