Open Distance and e-Learning: Ethiopian Doctoral Students’ Satisfaction with Support Services
This study assessed students’ level of satisfaction with the quality of student support services provided by an open distance e-learning (ODeL) university in Ethiopia. The target population was doctoral students who had been registered at the ODeL university for more than a year. To conduct a quantitative investigation, data were collected by means of a 34-item six-dimensional standardized questionnaire. Data analysis methods included linear as well as stepwise regressions. Using the gaps model as the theoretical framework, findings showed that the doctoral students were dissatisfied with four aspects of the student support services, namely supervision support, infrastructure, administrative support, and academic facilitation. In contrast, students were satisfied with the corporate image (reputation) of the ODeL university. For this ODeL university to play an effective role that coheres with the country’s socio-economic development plan, more attention should be given to the provision of supervision support, as there was strong dissatisfaction with this. The university could also build on or leverage aspects of their corporate image, for which there was strong satisfaction. Doing so will help the university make ongoing contributions and strengthen its commitment to the field of higher education and human capacity development in Ethiopia.
Dann, S. (2008). Applying services marketing principles to postgraduate supervision. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880810906481
Datt, G., & Singh, G. (2021). Learners’ satisfaction with website performance of an open and distance learning institution: A case study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i1.5097
Dzakiria, H. (2005). The role of learning support in open & distance learning: Learners’ experiences and perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(2), 95–109.
Farooq, M., Khalil-Ur-Rehman, F., Tijjani, A. D., Younas, W., Sajjad, S., & Zreen, A. (2019). Service quality analysis of private universities libraries in Malaysia in the era of transformative marketing. International Journal for Quality Research, 13(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR13.02-02
Jain, R., Sinha, G., & De, S. K. (2010). Service quality in higher education: An exploratory study. Asian Journal of Marketing, 4(3), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajm.2010.144.154
Kara, A. M., Tanui, E., & Kalai, J. M. (2016). Educational service quality and students’ satisfaction in public universities in Kenya. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 3(10), 37–48.
Khalil, A. A., Ragheb, M. A., Ragab, A. A., & Elsamadicy, A. M. (2018, September 21-22). Effect of service quality on student satisfaction on SMEs: The case of private schools in Egypt [Conference paper]. International Conference on Management and Information Systems 2018, Bangkok, Thailand. (pp. 94–103). http://www.icmis.net/icmis18/ICMIS18CD/pdf/S184-final.pdf
Ministry of Science and Higher Education. (2020a). Discussion document on quality human capital for quality higher education and national prosperity. Addis Ababa.
Ministry of Science and Higher Education. (2020b). National science policy and strategy. Addis Ababa.
Napitupulu, D., Rahim, R., Abdullah, D., Setiawan, M. I., Abdillah, L.A., Ahmar, A. S., Simarmata, J., Hidayat, R., Nurdiyanto, H., & Pranolo, A. (2018). Analysis of student satisfaction toward quality of service facility. Journal of Physics Conference Series, Indonesia, 954(1). https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/954/1/012019
Ngaaso, C. K., & Abbam, A. (2016). An appraisal of students’ level of satisfaction of support services of distance education at the University of Education, Winneba. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(10), 168–173.
Ntabathia, M. (2013). Service quality and student satisfaction of students in private universities in Nairobi County [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Nairobi.
Nyenya, T., & Bukaliya, R. (2015). Comparing students’ expectations with the students’ perceptions of service quality provided in open and distance learning institutions in Zimbabwe’s Mashonaland East Region. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, 2(4), 45–53.
O’Shea, S. E., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2015). “I ‘feel’ like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019970
Paposa, K. K., & Paposa, S. S. (2022). From brick to click classrooms: A paradigm shift during the pandemic—Identifying factors influencing service quality and learners’ satisfaction in click classrooms. Management and Labour Studies, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X211066234
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Secreto, P. V., & Pamulaklakin, R. L. (2015). Learners’ satisfaction level with online student portal as a support system in an open and distance e-learning environment (ODeL). Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 16(3), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.32741
Sembiring, M. G. (2015). Student satisfaction and persistence: Imperative features for retention in open and distance learning. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-10-01-2015-B002
Sibai, M. T., Bay, B., & Rosa, R. D. (2021) Service quality and student satisfaction using ServQual model: A study of a private medical college in Saudi Arabia. International Education Studies, 14(6), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n6p51
Sisay, S. (2020, January 4). Ministry seeks excellence with plan to classify public universities Ethiopian Monitor. https://ethiopianmonitor.com/2020/01/04/ministry-seeks-excellence-with-plan-to-classify-public-universities/
Southard, S., & Mooney, M. (2015). A comparative analysis of distance education quality assurance standards. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(1), 55–68.
Teeroovengadum, V., Kamalanabhan, T. J. & Seebaluck, A. K. (2016). Measuring service quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-06-2014-0028
Tsige G. A. (2016). Ensuring the quality of doctoral student support services in open distance learning [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of South Africa.
Van Deuren, R., Tsegazeab, K., Seid, M., & Wondimu W. (2016). Ethiopian new public universities: Achievements, challenges and illustrative case studies. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2014-0054
Wael, T. (2015). Using SERVQUAL model to assess service quality and students’ satisfaction in Pavia University, Italy. International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management, 2(3), 24–31.
Wodwossen, T. (2020, October 01). What next for a partially differentiated HE system? University World News, Issue No. 285. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200929080901365
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.