Open Textbook Author Journeys: Internal Conversations and Cycles of Time
One of the challenges experienced in South African higher education (HE) is a lack of access to affordable, appropriate textbooks and other teaching materials that can be legally shared on online forums and the Internet. There are also increasing calls to address transformation and social justice globally and in South African HE through curriculum transformation. This article draws on the research of the Digital Open Textbooks for Development initiative at the University of Cape Town (UCT). It presents the journeys of four open textbook authors at UCT in relation to the social injustices they witness in their classrooms. It also makes use of Margaret Archer’s social realist approach to explore dynamics related to open textbook authors’ agency and ultimate concerns, as well as how their internal conversations shape their practices and approaches to open textbooks. Open textbooks are framed as a set of practices that play out in varying cycles of time and hold promise in terms of addressing the need for greater access and inclusivity in HE.
Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency, and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087315
Archer, M. S. (2005). Structure, culture and agency. In M. Jacobs & N. Hanrahan (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the sociology of culture (pp. 17–34). Blackwell Publishing. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Blackwell+Companion+to+the+Sociology+of+Culture-p-9780631231745
Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618932
Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108058
Archer, M. S. (2016). The internal conversation: Mediating between structure and agency [Data collection]. Economic and Social Research Council. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-850178
Baker, J., & Hood, J. (2011). 7 things you should know about open textbook publishing. Educause Learning Initiative. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2011/3/7-things-you-should-know-about-open-textbook-publishing
Bethel, E. (2020). Open textbooks: Quality and relevance for postsecondary study in the Bahamas. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.4598
Black, S., Spreen, C., & Vally, S. (2020). Education, COVID-19 and care: Social inequality and social relations of value in South Africa and the United States. Southern African Review of Education, 26(1), 40–61. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-sare-v26-n1-a4
Bliss, T., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of online open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.3972
Caetano, A. (2014). Defining personal reflexivity: A critical reading of Archer’s approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014549684
Cox, G. (2016). Explaining the relations between culture, structure and agency in lecturers' contribution and non-contribution to Open Educational Resources in a higher education institution. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town, Faculty of Humanities, School of Education]. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/20300
Cox, G., Masuku, B., & Willmers, M. (2020). Open textbooks and social justice: Open educational practices to address economic, cultural and political injustice at the University of Cape Town. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(2), pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.556
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
Cronin. C. (2020). Open education: Walking a critical path. In D. Conrad, & P. Prinsloo (Eds.), Open(ing) education: Theory and practice (pp. 9–25). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004422988_002
Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D., Chambers, T., Chili, M., de Villiers, M., Felix, A., Gachago, D., Gokhale, C., Ivala, E., Kramm, N., Madiba, M., Mistri, G., Mgqwashu, E., Pallitt, N., Prinsloo, P., Solomon, K., Strydom, S., … & Wissing, G. (2020). A wake-up call: Equity, inequality and COVID-19 emergency remote teaching and learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 946–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4
Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET). (2020). Students’ access to and use of learning materials: Survey report 2020. https://www.usaf.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/DHET_SAULM-Report-2020.pdf
Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET). (2021). Social impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on youth in the post school education and training (PSET) sector in South Africa. https://www.dhet.gov.za/SiteAssets/Media%20Advisory%20and%20Statements%202021/PSET%20Youth%20survey%20presentation_April%202021.pdf
Digital Open Textbooks for Development. (2021, October 27). Open textbooks in South African higher education: Towards a national agenda. http://www.dot4d.uct.ac.za/news/open-textbooks-south-african-higher-education-towards-national-agenda
Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing justice in a globalizing world. New Left Review, 36, 69–88. https://newleftreview.org/II/36/nancy-fraser-reframing-justice-in-a-globalizing-world
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum. https://envs.ucsc.edu/internships/internship-readings/freire-pedagogy-of-the-oppressed.pdf
Frydenberg, J., & Matkin, G. W. (2007, October). Open textbooks: Why? What? When? How? Report to the William & Flora Hewlett Foundation.
Golob, T., & Makarovic, M. (2019). Reflexivity and structural positions: The effects of generation, gender and education. Social Sciences, 8(9), Article 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090248
Havemann, L. (2016). Open Educational Resources. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7
Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Arinto, P. B. (Eds.). (2017, December 15). Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South. African Minds, International Development Research Centre, & Research on Open Educational Resources for Development. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1005330
Hölscher, D., & Bozalek, V. (2020). Nancy Fraser’s work and its relevance to higher education. In V. Bozalek, D. Holscher, & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Nancy Fraser and participatory parity: Reframing social justice in South African higher education (pp. 3–19). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Nancy-Fraser-and-Participatory-Parity-Reframing-Social-Justice-in-South/Bozalek-Holscher-Zembylas/p/book/9780367505394
Inefuku, H. W. (2017, July 3). Globalization, open access, and the democratization of knowledge. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/7/globalization-open-access-and-the-democratization-of-knowledge
Jenkins, J. J., Sanchez, L. A., Schraedley, M. A. K., Hannas, J., Navick, N., & Young, J. (2020). Textbook broke: Textbook affordability as a social justice issue. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.549
Jhangiani, R. S., & DeRosa, R. (2017). Open pedagogy and social justice. Digital Pedagogy Lab. http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/open-pedagogy-social-justice/
Jhangiani, R. S., Green, A. G., & Belshaw, J. D. (2016). Three approaches to open textbook development. In P. Blessinger & T. J. Bliss (Eds.), Open education: International perspectives in higher education (pp. 179–197). Open Book Publishers. https://books.openedition.org/obp/3563?lang=en
Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (dis)course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 225–244. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/3101
Leibowitz, B. (2017). Cognitive justice and the higher education curriculum. Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal), 68, 93–112. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2520-98682017000100006&lng=en&tlng=en
Masuku, B., Willmers, M., & Cox, G. (2021). DOT4D Background, Technology Fluency and Personal Reflection Survey. Research instrument. University of Cape Town. https://doi.org/10.25375/uct.15066639.v1
Mendy, J., & Madiope, M. (2020). Curriculum transformation implementation in a South African university: Towards a new professional development framework. Preprint. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339740060_Curriculum_transformation_implementation_in_a_South_African_University_Towards_a_new_Professional_Development_Framework
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Morris-Babb, M., & Henderson, S. (2012). An experiment in open-access textbook publishing: Changing the world one textbook at a time. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 43(2), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.43.2.148
Moxley, J. (2013). Open textbook publishing. Academe, 99(5), 40–43. https://www.aaup.org/article/open-textbook-publishing#.Yikmy3rMJD8
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102
Pitt, R., Jordan, K., de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., & Weller, M. (2020). Supporting open educational practices through open textbooks. Distance Education, 41, 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757411
Robinson, R. S. (2014). Purposive sampling. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2337
Soudien, C. (2020). Complexities of difference and their significance for managing inequality in learning: Lessons from the COVID-19 crisis. Prospects, 49, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09486-x
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.