Improving Intergroup Relations Through Online Contact
This study examined an online professional development program designed to support meaningful acquaintance and reduce stereotypes and prejudices among teachers from different cultures in Israeli society. The rationale of the online program was based on the premise that indirect online contact might improve intergroup relations in diverse societies. The program was designed to progress gradually, starting from basic and leading to a deeper acquaintance, using a variety of computer-mediated communication (CMC) tools. Findings indicated that upon program completion, participants were more respectful towards one another than pre-program. They held a positive view of online learning and were open to multiculturalism (more tolerant and accepting of others than previously) while still maintaining their respective cultural identities. The program participants noticed the gradual progression in task design, expressly noting that this stepwise structure supported forging a connection and then fostering familiarization. This study fills a gap in the research through demonstrating ways that online contact (indirect contact) can be used to promote acquaintance and reduce stereotypes and prejudices among teachers from different groups in Israeli society.
Aiello, L. M., Barrat, A., Schifanella, R., Cattuto, C., Markines, B., & Menczer, F. (2012). Friendship prediction and homophily in social media. ACM Transactions on the Web, 6(2). http://doi.org/10.1145/2180861.2180866
Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y. & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 825-843. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00037.x
Amzalag, M., Elias, N., & Kali, Y. (2015). Adoption of online network tools by minority students: The case of students of Ethiopian origin in Israel. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Life Long Learning, 11, 291-312. https://doi.org/10.28945/2321
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational researcher, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Ariely, G. (2011). Globalization, immigration and national identity: How the level of globalization affects the relations between nationalism, constructive patriotism and attitudes toward immigrants? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(4), 539-557. http://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211430518
Bar-On, D. (2008). The others within us: Constructing Jewish-Israeli identity. Cambridge University Press.
Batson, C. D., & Ahmad, N. Y. (2009). Using empathy to improve intergroup attitudes and relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 3(1), 141-177.
Bisgin, H., Agarwal, N., & Xu, X. (2010, August). Investigating homophily in online social networks. In 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 533-536). IEEE. http://doi.org/doi: 10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.61
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brindley, J. E., Blaschke, L. M., & Walti, C. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675
Clarke, G. (2001). From ethnocide to ethnodevelopment? Ethnic minorities and Indigenous Peoples in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly, 22(3), 413-436. http://doi.org/10.1080/0143659012006168
Cohen, A. (2018). Cultures within cultures in Israel: Jewish and Arab cultures and the work–family interface. In K.M. Shockley, W. Shen, & R.C. Johnson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the global work–family interface (pp. 424-435). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235556.023
Conceição, S. C. (2006). Faculty lived experiences in the online environment. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(1), 26-45. http://doi.org/doi: 10.1177/1059601106292247
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Diaz, J., & Zirkel, S. (2012). Globalization, psychology, and social issues research: An introduction and conceptual framework. Journal of Social Issues, 68(3), 439-453. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01757.x
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1999). Reducing prejudice: Combating intergroup biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(4), 101-105. https://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~schaller/308Readings/Dovidio1999.pdf
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., & Frazier, S. (1997). Extending the benefits of recategorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure, and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(4), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1327
Dunning, H., Williams, A., Abonyi, S., & Crooks, V. (2008). A mixed method approach to quality of life research: A case study approach. Social Indicators Research, 85(1), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9131-5
Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research, 3 (pp. 178-183). Sage.
Hasler, B. S. & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2013). Online intergroup contact. In Y. Amichai- Hamburger (Ed.), The social net: Understanding our online behavior (pp. 220-252). Oxford University Press.
Hofstra, B., Corten, R., van Tubergen, F., & Ellison, N. B. (2017). Sources of segregation in social networks: A novel approach using Facebook. American Sociological Review, 82(3), 625-656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417705656
Holladay, C. L., Knight, J. L., Paige, D. L., & Quiñones, M. A. (2003). The influence of framing on attitudes toward diversity training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(3), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1065
Hurt, N. E., Moss, G. S., Bradley, C. L., Larson, L. R., Lovelace, M., Prevost, L. B., ... & Camus, M. S. (2012). The" Facebook" Effect: College Students' Perceptions of Online Discussions in the Age of Social Networking. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), n2. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060210
Katz, Y. (2013). The state approach to Jewish and non-Jewish education in Israel. In K. Watson & W.I. Ozanne (Eds.), Education and religion: Global pressures, local responses (pp. 325-338). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2010.503741
Kim, N., & Wojcieszak, M. (2018). Intergroup contact through online comments: Effects of direct and extended contact on outgroup attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.013
Kinnvall, C., & Lindén, J. (2010). Dialogical selves between security and insecurity: Migration, multiculturalism, and the challenge of the global. Theory & Psychology, 20(5), 595-619. http://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309360077
Laron, D., & Lev Ari, L. (2013). “There is something here that makes it possible”: Jewish and other students in the master’s degree programs at Oranim College. Dvarim, 6, 99-116.
Lev-On, A., & Lissitsa, S. (2015). Studying the coevolution of social distance, offline- and online contacts. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 448-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.009
Maruyama, G., Moreno, J. F., Gudeman, R. H., & Marin, P. (2000). Does diversity make a difference? Three research studies on diversity in college classrooms (ED444409). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED444409.pdf
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444.
Paluck, E. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 574-587. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011989
Patsiurko, N., Campbell, J. L., & Hall, J. A. (2012). Measuring cultural diversity: Ethnic, linguistic and religious fractionalization in the OECD. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(2), 195-217. http://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.579136
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Payne, B. K., Krosnick, J. A., Pasek, J., Lelkes, Y., Akhtar, O., & Tompson, T. (2010). Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 American presidential election. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 367-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.001
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.521
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922-934.
Pohan, C. A., & Aguilar, T. E. (2001). Measuring educators’ beliefs about diversity in personal and professional contexts. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038001159
Rew, L., Becker, H., Cookston, J., Khosropour, S., & Martinez, S. (2003). Measuring cultural awareness in nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 42(6), 249-257.
Rodriguez, N. P. (2003). The real “New World Order”: The globalization of racial and ethnic relations in the late twentieth century. In M.C. Guttman, F.V. Matos Rodriguez, L. Stephen, & P. Zavella (Eds.), Perspectives on Las Américas: A reader in culture, history, and representation (pp. 81-89). Blackwell Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753538.ch5
Sabbagh, C., & Resh, N. (2014). Citizenship orientations in a divided society: A comparison of three groups of Israeli junior-high students—secular Jews, religious Jews, and Israeli Arabs. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 9(1), 34-54. http://doi.org/10.1177/1746197913497662
Schellhaas, F. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2016). Improving intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.002
Shapira, N., Kupermintz, H., & Kali, Y. (2016). Design principles for promoting intergroup empathy in online environments. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Life Long Learning, 12, 225-246. http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3605
Shapira, N., Kali, Y., Kupermintz, H., & Dolev, N. (2020). Utilizing television sitcom to foster intergroup empathy among Israeli teachers. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 22(3), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v22i3.2225
Stathi, S., & Crisp, R. J. (2008). Imagining intergroup contact promotes projection to outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 943-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.003
Steinberg, S., & Bar-On, D. (2002). An analysis of the group process in encounters between Jews and Palestinians using a typology for discourse classification. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(01)00047-5
Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., Cairns, E., Marinetti, C., Geddes, L., & Parkinson, B. (2008). Post conflict reconciliation: Intergroup forgiveness and implicit biases in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 303-320. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00563.x
Van Cott, D. L. (2005). Building inclusive democracies: Indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities in Latin America. Democratization, 12(5), 820-837. http://doi.org/10.1080/13510340500322215
Walther, J. B., Hoter, E., Ganayem, A., & Shonfeld, M. (2015). Computer-mediated communication and the reduction of prejudice: A controlled longitudinal field experiment among Jews and Arabs in Israel. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 550-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.004
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.