AI as a Pedagogical Scaffold: Enhancing English as a Foreign Language Argumentative Writing and Critical Thinking in a Distributed Learning Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v27i2.9499Keywords:
generative artificial intelligence, blended learning, argumentative writing, critical thinking, English as a foreign language, academic writing instruction, open and distance learningAbstract
This study investigated the impact of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) supported by blended instruction on the argumentative writing skills of first-year students in an English as a foreign language (EFL) teacher education program in a state university in Türkiye. The study was designed as a qualitative case study supported by quantitative data. The study involved nine English language teaching students who initially received traditional academic writing instruction. They completed a pre-test. They participated in a 4-week online writing course integrating GenAI tools within a blended learning environment. Data were collected through pre- and post-tests as well as semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings indicate that GenAI contributed to key stages of the writing process, particularly in idea generation, text organization, argument development, and critical thinking. Participants reported increased confidence and engagement, benefiting from immediate, personalized feedback and flexible learning opportunities. However, concerns regarding reliability and overdependence also emerged. The study suggests that with proper teacher guidance, GenAI can function as a pedagogical scaffold in blended academic writing instruction, supporting learners’ higher-order thinking and autonomy. These insights contribute to understanding how emerging AI technologies can be effectively integrated into EFL contexts to enhance complex writing skills.
References
Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca University Press.
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, Article 100745 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day (pp. 120–190). Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 198–204. https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/718
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to coronavirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
Demirer, V., & Aydın, B. (2017). Ters yüz sinif modeli çerçevesinde gerçekleştirilmiş çalişmalara bir bakiş: içerik analizi. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 7(1), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.288488
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., ... Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Erdem-Aydın, İ., Çalışkan, H. & Usta, İ. (2025). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenmede ChatGPT türü yapay zekâ destekli uygulamaların kullanım alanlarının belirlenmesi [Determining the use of ChatGPT-type artificial intelligence supported applications in open and distance learning]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(1), 666–697. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1576430
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73474
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738.ch21
Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54, Article 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation. Computers & Education, 203, 104862.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862
Han, J., Yoo, H., Kim, Y., Myung, J., Kim, M., Lim, H., Kim, J., Lee, T. Y., Hong, H., Ahn, S.-Y. & Oh, A. (2023). RECIPE: How to integrate ChatGPT into EFL writing education. In D. Spikol (Chair), Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 416–420). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3573051.3596200
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Hu, X., Xu, S., Tong, R., & Graesser, A. (2025). Generative AI in education: From foundational insights to the Socratic playground for learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.06682
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T. … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Law, E. L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174
Lee, S. C. N., & Tajino, A. (2008). Understanding Students’ Perceptions of Difficulty with Academic Writing for Teacher Development: A Case Study of the University of Tokyo Writing Program. Kyoto University Research Information Repository, 14, 1–11.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Using argumentation vee diagrams (AVDs) for promoting critical thinking and argumentative writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.549
Park, Y., & Doo, M. Y. (2024). Role of AI in blended learning: A systematic literature review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(1), 164–196. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7566
Qin, J. (2013). Applying the Toulmin model in teaching L2 argumentative writing. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 21–29. https://jltl.com.tr/index.php/jltl/article/view/109
Suh, S., Bang, J., & Han, J. W. (2025). Developing critical thinking in second language learners: Exploring generative AI like ChatGPT as a tool for argumentative essay writing. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.17013
Sun, T. (2023). The potential use of generative AI in ESL writing assessment: A case study of IELTS writing tasks. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.137
Sun, Y., Zhao, X., Li, X., & Yu, F. (2023). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom on self-efficacy among students: A meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2287886
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Wang, C. (2024). Exploring students’ generative AI-assisted writing processes: Perceptions and experiences from native and nonnative English speakers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30, 1825–1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.
Wingate, U. (2012). “Argument!” Helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
Xu, T., & Jumaat, N. F. (2025). Enhancing Critical Thinking in EFL Writing Through an AI-Supported Blended Learning Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(1), 1975–1994
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhai, C., & Wibowo, S. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100134
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.




