Language of evaluation: How PLA evaluators write about student learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i1.946Keywords:
Prior Learning Assessment, Assessing LearningAbstract
Very few studies (e.g., Arnold, 1998; Joosten-ten Brinke, et al., 2009) have examined the ways in which evaluators assess students’ prior learning. This investigation explored the ways that evaluators described students’ prior learning in final assessment reports at a single, multiple-location institution. Results found four themes; audience, voice, presentation of the learning, and evaluation language. Within each theme, further sub-themes are defined. These results are significant for training evaluators on how to discuss student learning and for institutions to consider in relationship to the purpose behind the evaluations. Further research and implications are discussed.Published
2011-01-31
How to Cite
Travers, N. L., Smith, B., Ellis, L., Brady, T., Feldman, L., Hakim, K., … Treadwell, A. (2011). Language of evaluation: How PLA evaluators write about student learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i1.946
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
