Artificial Intelligence in Education: Mapping Adaptive Learning and Learning Analytics in K–12 Online, Virtual, and Distance Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v27i2.9370Keywords:
artificial intelligence in education, AIED, adaptive learning, personalized learning, artificial intelligence, K-12 online learning, learning analytics, equity, scoping reviewAbstract
This scoping review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) has been conceptualized and applied in adaptive learning and learning analytics in K–12 online and distance education between 2020 and 2025. Following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR, we analyzed 21 empirical studies to explore thematic patterns, methodological trends, and research gaps. Most studies reported gains for learners in engagement, motivation, and self-regulation. However, reported benefits were unevenly distributed and often favored better-resourced learners, particularly in contexts where teacher mediation and institutional support were modest. AI was explicitly integrated in two-thirds of the studies, yet definitional inconsistencies blurred distinctions between genuine intelligence and automated adaptation. Quantitative designs were predominant, largely focusing on performance outcomes as derived from system logs and test data. While a small but growing number of mixed-methods studies have focused on learner experience and teacher mediation, the field remains constrained by methodological consistency and insufficient clarity regarding AI mechanisms. The findings highlight the importance of clearer conceptual frameworks, research designs that are participatory and context-sensitive, and ethical approaches that center teacher expertise and learner participation. This review argues that the transformative potential of AI for adaptive learning depends less on technological sophistication than on equitable, pedagogically informed integration between human judgment and automated systems.
References
Aguerrebere, C., He, H., Kwet, M., Laakso, M.-J., Lang, C., Marconi, C., Price-Dennis, D., & Zhang, H. (2022). Global perspectives on learning analytics in K–12 education. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, & A. F. Wise (Eds.), The handbook of learning analytics (2nd ed., pp. 223–231). SOLAR. https://doi.org/10.18608/hla22.022
Al-Malki, L., & Meccawy, M. (2022). Investigating students’ performance and motivation in computer programming through a gamified recommender system. Computers in the Schools, 39(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2071229
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Bhatt, S. M., Van den Noortgate, W., & Verbert, K. (2024). Investigating the use of deep learning and implicit feedback in K12 educational recommender systems. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17(1), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3273422
Boulhrir, T. (2025). [Review of the book Brave new words: How AI will revolutionize education (and why it’s a good thing) by Sal Khan]. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(4), 176–179. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i4.9020
Boulhrir, T., & Ait Bouch, R. (2025). Sustainable development goals in elementary school education: Implications for curriculum integration and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 27(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2025-0010
Boulhrir, T., Hamash, M., & Ghreir, H. M. A. (2026). The Dual Edge of Large Language Models: Innovation in Education and Emerging Ethical Implications. In Innovations and Ethical Dimensions of Large Language Models (pp. 273-316). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-5017-2.ch009
Cheah, Y. H., Lu, J., & Kim, J. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence in K–12 education: Examining teachers’ preparedness, practices, and barriers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100363
Chellanthara Jose, B., Ashok Kumar, M., UdayaBanu, T., & Nagalakshmi, M. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of adaptive learning systems in K–12 education. International Journal of Advanced IT Research and Development, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.69942/1920184/20240101/02
Divanji, R. A., Bindman, S., Tung, A., Chen, K., Castaneda, L., & Scanlon, M. (2023). A one stop shop? Perspectives on the value of adaptive learning technologies in K–12 education. Computers and Education Open, 5, Article 100157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100157
Global Education Monitoring Report Team. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
Hamash, M., Ghreir, H., Tiernan, P., & Boulhrir, T. (2025). From NPCs to AI assistants: A scoping review of AI-driven agents in immersive STEM learning. In B. I. Edwards, H. Abuhassna, D. Olugbade, O. A. Ojo, & W. A. Jaafar Wan Yahaya (Eds.), Advances in computational intelligence and robotics (pp. 211–244). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0847-0.ch008
Hamash, M., & Mohamed, H. (2021). BASAER team: The first Arabic robot team for building the capacities of visually impaired students to build and program robots. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(24), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i24.27465
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. In C. Stückelberger & P. Duggal (Eds.), Data ethics: Building trust: How digital technologies can serve humanity (pp. 621–653). Globethics Publications. https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068
Huck, C., & Zhang, J. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on K–12 education: A systematic literature review. New Waves—Educational Research and Development Journal, 24(1), 53–84. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1308731
Hwang, G.-J., Sung, H.-Y., Chang, S.-C., & Huang, X.-C. (2020). A fuzzy expert system-based adaptive learning approach to improving students’ learning performances by considering affective and cognitive factors. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100003
Ihichr, A., Oustous, O., El Idrissi, Y. E. B., & Lahcen, A. A. (2024). A systematic review on assessment in adaptive learning: Theories, algorithms and techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150785
Johnson, C. C., Walton, J. B., Strickler, L., & Elliott, J. B. (2023). Online teaching in K–12 education in the United States: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 93(3), 353–411. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221105550
Katz, D., Huggins-Manley, A. C., & Leite, W. (2022). Personalized online learning, test fairness, and educational measurement: Considering differential content exposure prior to a high-stakes end of course exam. Applied Measurement in Education, 35(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2022.2034824
Kim, S., Kim, J.-H., Hyung, W., Shin, S., Choi, M. J., Kim, D. H., & Im, C.-H. (2024). Characteristic behaviors of elementary students in a low attention state during online learning identified using electroencephalography. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17(1), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3289498
Lamb, R., Neumann, K., & Linder, K. A. (2022). Real-time prediction of science student learning outcomes using machine learning classification of hemodynamics during virtual reality and online learning sessions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100078
Leite, W. L., Kuang, H., Jing, Z., Xing, W., Cavanaugh, C., & Huggins-Manley, A. C. (2022). The relationship between self-regulated student use of a virtual learning environment for algebra and student achievement: An examination of the role of teacher orchestration. Computers & Education, 191, Article 104615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104615
Li, C., Xing, W., Song, Y., & Lyu, B. (2025). RICE AlgebraBot: Lessons learned from designing and developing responsible conversational AI using induction, concretization, and exemplification to support algebra learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100338
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson. https://oro.open.ac.uk/50104/
Maier, U., & Klotz, C. (2022). Personalized feedback in digital learning environments: Classification framework and literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100080
Martin, F., Chen, Y., Moore, R. L., & Westine, C. D. (2020). Systematic review of adaptive learning research designs, context, strategies, and technologies from 2009 to 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1903–1929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09793-2
Maryono, D., Sajidan, Akhyar, M., Sarwanto, Wicaksono, B. T., & Prakisya, N. P. T. (2025). NgodingSeru.com: An adaptive e-learning system with gamification to enhance programming problem-solving skills for vocational high school students. Discover Education, 4(1), Article 157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00581-9
Palliyalil, S., & Mukherjee, S. (2020). Byju’s the learning app: An investigative study on the transformation from traditional learning to technology-based personalized learning. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 5054–5059. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342901964_Byju's_The_Learning_App_An_Investigative_Study_On_The_Transformation_From_Traditional_Learning_To_Technology_Based_Personalized_Learning
Pardamean, B., Suparyanto, T., Cenggoro, T. W., Sudigyo, D., & Anugrahana, A. (2022). AI-based learning style prediction in online learning for primary education. IEEE Access, 10, 35725–35735. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160177
Poly, A., Banu, P. K. N., Althuniyan, N., Azar, A. T., & Kamal, N. A. (2025). Fuzzy logic approach to cold-start challenges in deaf and hard of hearing recommender systems. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 15(3), 23449–23460. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10825
Romero Alonso, R., Araya Carvajal, K., & Reyes Acevedo, N. (2024). Rol de la inteligencia artificial en la personalización de la educación a distancia: Una revisión sistemática [The role of artificial intelligence in personalizing distance education: A systematic review]. RIED–Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 28(1), 9–36. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.28.1.41538
Rundquist, R., Holmberg, K., Rack, J., Mohseni, Z., & Masiello, I. (2024). Use of learning analytics in K–12 mathematics education: Systematic scoping review of the impact on teaching and learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(3), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8299
Saif, A. F. M. S., Mahayuddin, Z. R., & Shapi’i, A. (2021). Augmented reality based adaptive and collaborative learning methods for improved primary education towards the fourth industrial revolution (IR 4.0). International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(6), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120672
Sancenon, V., Wijaya, K., Yue Shu Wen, X., Adi Utama, D., Ashworth, M., & Ng, K. H. (2022). A new Web-based personalized learning system improves students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.295306
Shum, S. B., Ferguson, R., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2019). Human-centred learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.1
Tretow-Fish, T. A. B., & Khalid, M. S. (2023). Methods for evaluating learning analytics and learning analytics dashboards in adaptive learning platforms: A systematic review. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 21(5), 430–449. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.5.3088
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Wahyuningsih, Y., Djunaidy, A., & Siahaan, D. (2024). Concept–effect relationship weighting based on frequency of concept’s co-occurrence for developing personalized remedial learning path. IEEE Access, 12, 13878–13892. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3355138
Wang, S., Christensen, C., McBride, E., Kelly, H., Cui, W., Tong, R., Shear, L., Yarnall, L., & Feng, M. (2020). Identifying gaps in use of and research on adaptive learning systems. In H. C. Lane, S. Zvacek, & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (Vol. 1, pp. 118–124). SciTePress: Science and Technology Publications. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009590701180124
Yang, S., Carter, R. A., Zhang, L., & Hunt, T. (2021). Emergent themes of blended learning in K–12 educational environments: Lessons from the Every Student Succeeds Act. Computers & Education, 163, Article 104116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104116
Yang, Y., Song, Y., Yan, J., & Ma, Q. (2025). Bridging classroom and real-life learning mediated by a mobile app with a self-regulation scheme: Impacts on Chinese EFL primary students’ self-regulated vocabulary learning outcomes, enjoyment, and learning behaviours. System, 131, Article 103671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103671
Yim, I. H. Y., & Su, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) learning tools in K–12 education: A scoping review. Journal of Computers in Education, 12, 93–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00304-9
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.




