Enhancing Human-Generative Artificial Intelligence Online Collaboration Outcomes: The Pivotal Function of Symbiotic Role Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v27i2.9189Keywords:
human–machine collaboration, human–AI collaboration, symbiosis theory, online collaborative learning, collaborative cognitive loadAbstract
While generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has emerged as a vital support tool for collaborative learning, further exploration is required to achieve effective human-machine symbiosis in online collaborative processes. Grounded in symbiosis theory, our study developed a role-based intervention strategy to empower learners and their artificial intelligence (AI) partners through clearly defined responsibilities and collaborative interaction rules. In a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design involving 58 graduate students, we employed statistical analyses and lag sequential analysis to evaluate the impact of the role intervention on online collaborative learning. The results indicated that the role design (a) significantly enhanced the quality of collaborative knowledge construction, (b) facilitated transitions among higher-order collaborative behaviors, and (c) improved perceived usefulness and ease of use of GAI among learners, although it also led to a moderate increase in collaborative cognitive load. These findings validated the core value of symbiosis theory-based role design for optimizing human-AI collaboration. Our study offered both a theoretical perspective on human-machine co-development and valuable insights for instructors to integrate AI tools and design more effective online collaborative learning activities.
References
Adewale, M. D., Azeta, A., Abayomi-Alli, A., & Sambo-Magaji, A. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence adoption on students’ academic performance in open and distance learning: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 10(22), e40025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40025
Barrot, J. S. (2024). ChatGPT as a language learning tool: An emerging technology report. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(2), 1151–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09711-4
Becks, L., Gaedke, U., & Klauschies, T. (2025). Emergent feedback between symbiosis form and population dynamics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 40(5), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2025.02.006
Borge, M., Smith, B. K., & Aldemir, T. (2024). Using generative AI as a simulation to support higher-order thinking. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 19(4), 479–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09437-0
Canonigo, A. M. (2024). Levering AI to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and confidence in mathematics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 3215–3229. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13065
Chen, B., Zhu, X., & Díaz del Castillo H. F. (2023). Integrating generative AI in knowledge building. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100184
Cheng, B., Wang, M., & Mercer, N. (2014). Effects of role assignment in concept mapping mediated small group learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.06.001
Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2016). Learners’ interpersonal beliefs and generated feedback in an online role-playing peer-feedback activity: An exploratory study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2221
Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2023). Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(4), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09409-w
Cukurova, M. (2025). The interplay of learning, analytics and artificial intelligence in education: A vision for hybrid intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13514
de Araujo, A., Papadopoulos, P. M., McKenney, S., & de Jong, T. (2025). Investigating the impact of a collaborative conversational agent on dialogue productivity and knowledge acquisition. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35, 2254–2280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00469-7
Du, Q. (2025). How artificially intelligent conversational agents influence EFL learners’self-regulated learning and retention. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 21635–21701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13602-9
Duranti, A. (2023). If it is language that speaks, what do speakers do? Confronting Heidegger’s language ontology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 33(3), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12404
Faza, A., & Lestari, I. A. (2025). Self-regulated learning in the digital age: A systematic review of strategies, technologies, benefits, and challenges. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(2), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i2.8119
Feng, Q., Li, W., Zhu, X., & Li, X. (2025). Exploring the effects of elaborated and motivational feedback on learning engagement in online scripted role discussion. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00499-6
Feng, S. (2025). Group interaction patterns in generative AI‐supported collaborative problem solving: Network analysis of the interactions among students and a GAI chatbot. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 2125–2140. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13611
Gui, Y., Cai, Z., Zhang, S., & Fan, X. (2025). Dyads composed of members with high prior knowledge are most conducive to digital game-based collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 230, 105266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105266
Gyasi, J. F., Zheng, L., Love, S. F., & Boateng, F. O. (2025). The effects of three different approaches to human-AI collaboration on online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 28(2), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202504_28(2).TP07
Hao, X., Demir, E., & Eyers, D. (2024). Exploring collaborative decision-making: A quasi-experimental study of human and generative AI interaction. Technology in Society, 78, 102662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102662
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487
Janssen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: Towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
Ji, Y., Zhan, Z., Li, T., Zou, X., & Lyu, S. (2025). Human-machine cocreation: The effects of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, AI awareness, critical thinking, and cognitive load in a STEM course toward entrepreneurship. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 18, 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2025.3554584
Karimova, G. Z., Kim, Y. D., & Shirkhanbeik, A. (2025). Poietic symbiosis or algorithmic subjugation: Generative AI technology in marketing communications education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 2185–2209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12877-8
Kong, X., Fang, H., Chen, W., Xiao, J., & Zhang, M. (2025). Examining human-AI collaboration in hybrid intelligence learning environments: Insight from the synergy degree model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 821. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05097-z
Lee, G.-G., Mun, S., Shin, M.-K., & Zhai, X. (2025). Collaborative learning with artificial intelligence speakers. Science & Education, 34(2), 847–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00526-y
Lenski, S., Elsner, S., & Großschedl, J. (2022). Comparing construction and study of concept maps: An intervention study on learning outcome, self-evaluation and enjoyment through training and learning. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.892312
Leung, C. F. (2000). Assessment for learning: Using solo taxonomy to measure design performance of design & technology students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008937007674
Li, T., Ji, Y., & Zhan, Z. (2024). Expert or machine? Comparing the effect of pairing student teacher with in-service teacher and ChatGPT on their critical thinking, learning performance, and cognitive load in an integrated-STEM course. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305163
Li, T., Zhan, Z., Ji, Y., & Li, T. (2025). Exploring human and AI collaboration in inclusive STEM teacher training: A synergistic approach based on self-determination theory. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 101003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101003
Mackay, W. E. (2024). Parasitic or symbiotic? Redefining our relationship with intelligent systems. Adjunct proceedings of the 37th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (pp. 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3672539.3695752
Mai, D. T. T., Da, C. V., & Hanh, N. V. (2024). The use of ChatGPT in teaching and learning: A systematic review through SWOT analysis approach. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1328769
Mena-Guacas, A. F., Rodríguez, J. A. U., Trujillo, D. M. S., Gómez-Galán, J., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Collaborative learning and skill development for educational growth of artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep428. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13123
Morales-García, W. C., Sairitupa-Sanchez, L. Z., Morales-García, S. B., & Morales-García, M. (2024). Development and validation of a scale for dependence on artificial intelligence in university students. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1323898
Muñoz-Carril, P.-C., Hernández-Sellés, N., Fuentes-Abeledo, E.-J., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2021). Factors influencing students’ perceived impact of learning and satisfaction in computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 174, 104310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104310
Naik, A., Yin, J. R., Kamath, A., Ma, Q., Wu, S. T., Murray, R. C., Bogart, C., Sakr, M., & Rose, C. P. (2025). Providing tailored reflection instructions in collaborative learning using large language models. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13548
Ouyang, F., Chen, S., Yang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2022). Examining the effects of three group-level metacognitive scaffoldings on in-service teachers’ knowledge building. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 352–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211030847
Park, Y., & Doo, M. Y. (2024). Role of AI in blended learning: A systematic literature review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(1), 164–196. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7566
Peltoniemi, A. J., Lämsä, J., Lehesvuori, S., & Hämäläinen, R. (2025). Understanding the role of I-positions facilitating knowledge construction in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 20, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-025-09447-6
Pozdniakov, S., Brazil, J., Mohammadi, M., Dollinger, M., Sadiq, S., & Khosravi, H. (2025). AI-assisted co-creation: Bridging skill gaps in student-generated content. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8601
Puntambekar, S., Gnesdilow, D., & Yavuz, S. (2023). Understanding the effect of differences in prior knowledge on middle school students’ collaborative interactions and learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(4), 531–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09405-0
Saqr, M., López-Pernas, S., & Murphy, K. (2024). How group structure, members’ interactions and teacher facilitation explain the emergence of roles in collaborative learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, 102463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102463
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Liu, H., & Zahid, H. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence (ChatGPT-4) and social media impact on academic performance and psychological well-being in China’s higher education. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12835. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12835
Shin, J. G., Koch, J., Lucero, A., Dalsgaard, P., & Mackay, W. E. (2023). Integrating AI in human-human collaborative ideation. Extended abstracts of the 2023 ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3573802
Strauß, S., Tunnigkeit, I., Eberle, J., Avdullahu, A., & Rummel, N. (2025). Comparing the effects of a collaboration script and collaborative reflection on promoting knowledge about good collaboration and effective interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 20(1), 121–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09430-7
Veiga, F., Gil-Del-Val, A., Iriondo, E., & Eslava, U. (2025). Validation of the use of concept maps as an evaluation tool for the teaching and learning of mechanical and industrial engineering. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 35(1), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09903-8
Wang, C.-L. (2019). Learning from and for one another: An inquiry on symbiotic learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(11), 1164–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1526671
Wang, P., Luo, H., Liu, B., Chen, T., & Jiang, H. (2024). Investigating the combined effects of role assignment and discussion timing in a blended learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 60, 100932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100932
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
Wei, X., Wang, L., Lee, L.-K., & Liu, R. (2025). The effects of generative AI on collaborative problem-solving and team creativity performance in digital story creation: An experimental study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00526-0
Zabolotna, K., Nøhr, L., Iwata, M., Spikol, D., Malmberg, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2025). How does collaborative task design shape collaborative knowledge construction and group-level regulation of learning? A study of secondary school students’ interactions in two varied tasks. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 20(2), 171–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09442-3
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhang, S., Chen, J., Wen, Y., Chen, H., Gao, Q., & Wang, Q. (2021). Capturing regulatory patterns in online collaborative learning: A network analytic approach. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09339-5
Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Zhou, T., & Kim, J. H. (2024). Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0
Zheng, L., Fan, Y., Chen, B., Huang, Z., LeiGao, & Long, M. (2024). An AI-enabled feedback-feedforward approach to promoting online collaborative learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 11385–11406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12292-5
Zhu, X., Shui, H., & Chen, B. (2023). Beyond reading together: Facilitating knowledge construction through participation roles and social annotation in college classrooms. The Internet and Higher Education, 59, 100919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100919
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.




