Innovating Interprofessional Continuing Professional Development: Applying the Community of Inquiry Framework to Digital Learning Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v27i1.8650Keywords:
professional development, distance education, healthcare professionals, collaborative learning, interprofessional continuing professional development, community of inquiryAbstract
This study investigated how the community of inquiry (CoI) framework can inform digital platform design for interprofessional continuing professional development (ICPD) in healthcare. Using a three-stage comparative methodology, we analyzed technological tools from foundational CoI literature (stage 1), conducted a rapid review of current digital ICPD practices (stage 2), and synthesized findings through matrix-based comparison (stage 3). The analysis of 10 foundational CoI studies and 11 digital interprofessional education studies revealed four distinct adaptation patterns: (a) technological convergence in core communication tools (asynchronous forums, Learning Management System (LMS) platforms); (b) evolutionary divergence in collaborative technologies (video conferencing, real-time document sharing); (c) implementation gaps in reflective and scaffolding tools; and (d) professional context adaptations addressing healthcare-specific needs. While current ICPD practices have demonstrated strong alignment with CoI principles in communication and collaboration tools, significant gaps exist in structured reflection mechanisms, automated feedback systems, and adaptive facilitation features. Critically, systematic CoI framework application in authentic ICPD contexts with practicing professionals has remained largely unexplored, with studies predominantly focused on pre-licensure interprofessional education. Current implementations have used CoI retrospectively as an analytical framework rather than proactively for design guidance. These findings suggest selective rather than comprehensive CoI integration in professional continuing education contexts. The study provided preliminary theoretical guidance for enhancing digital ICPD through CoI-informed design while highlighting the urgent need for empirical validation with practicing healthcare professionals.
References
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3-4.1680
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009a). Development of a community of inquiry in online and blended learning contexts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1834–1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.324
Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009b). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765
Akyol, Z., Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820902809147
Anderson, T., Rouke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., Porritt, K., Pilla, B., & Jordan, Z. (Eds.). (2024). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
Barr, H. (2009). An anatomy of continuing interprofessional education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 29(3), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.20027
Belur, J., Tompson, L., Thornton, A., & Simon, M. (2021). Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: Exploring variation in coder decision-making. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 837–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372
Billings, H., Malin, T., Allen, J., Bergene, A., Cornelius, K., Craft, S., Hartzheim, L., Johnson, S. A., Kallay, J., Kreuter, J., Raths, M., Renner, A. S., & Hall, E. (2022). Reimagining learning spaces of the future: An interprofessional, virtual workshop utilizing rapid idea generation and lean startup methodologies. MedEdPORTAL, 18, 11217. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11217
Bluteau, P. (2020). The good enough facilitator: Exploring online interprofessional therapeutic facilitation in times of COVID-19. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(5), 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1807919
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
Dyess, A. L., Brown, J. S., Brown, N. D., Flautt, K. M., & Barnes, L. J. (2019). Impact of interprofessional education on students of the health professions: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 16. https://doi.org/10.3352%2Fjeehp.2019.16.33
Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). Cambridge University Press.
Evans, S., Knight, T., Walker, A., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2020). Facilitators’ teaching and social presence in online asynchronous interprofessional education discussion. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(4), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1622517
Evans, S., & Perry, E. (2023). An exploration of perceptions of online asynchronous and synchronous interprofessional education facilitation strategies. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 37(6), 1010–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2023.2213718
Evans, S. M., Ward, C., & Reeves, S. (2017). An exploration of teaching presence in online interprofessional education facilitation. Medical Teacher, 39(7), 773–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1297531
Evans, S., Ward, C., & Reeves, S. (2018). Online interprofessional education facilitation: A scoping review. Medical Teacher, 40(7), 762–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1460656
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2009). Role of instructional technology in the transformation of higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9014-7
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Hanna, E., Soren, B., Telner, D., MacNeill, H., Lowe, M., & Reeves, S. (2013). Flying blind: The experience of online interprofessional facilitation. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(4), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.723071
Hayward, K., Brown, M., Pendergast, N., Nicholson, M., Newell, J., Fancy, T., & Cameron, H. (2021). IPE via online education: Pedagogical pathways spanning the distance. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 24, 100447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2021.100447
Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
Lazinski, M. J., Ross, L., Wolf, S., Finck, M., & Cherry, L. (2021). Interprofessional education at a distance: The hybrid interprofessional education model. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 19(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580X/2021.2011
MacNeill, H., Telner, D., Sparaggis-Agaliotis, A., & Hanna, E. (2014). All for one and one for all: Understanding health professionals’ experience in individual versus collaborative online learning. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 34(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.21226
Meleis, A. I. (2016). Interprofessional education: A summary of reports and barriers to recommendations. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(1), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12184
Rawlinson, C., Carron, T., Cohidon, C., Arditi, C., Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Peytremann-Bridevaux, I., & Gilles, I. (2021). An overview of reviews on interprofessional collaboration in primary care: Barriers and facilitators. International Journal of Integrated Care, 21(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5589
Robb, M., & Spadaro, K. C. (2022). Exploration of online Doctor of Nursing practice students’ perceptions of effective teaching methods using the critical incident technique. Nurse Educator, 47(6), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001217
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education/Revue de l’ducation Distance, 14(2), 50–71. Retrieved September 3, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/92000/
Shohel, M. M. C., & Kirkwood, A. (2012). Using technology for enhancing teaching and learning in Bangladesh: Challenges and consequences. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(4), 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.671177
Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213498851
Thigpen, J., Naccarini, D., Moore, S. L., & Culhane, N. S. (2023). Incorporating interprofessional education into a required introductory pharmacy and nursing didactic course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 87(9), 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100123
Tricco, A. C., Antony, J., Zarin, W., Strifler, L., Ghassemi, M., Ivory, J., Perrier, L., Hutton, B., Moher, D., & Straus, S. E. (2015). A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Medicine, 13, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6
Tunningley, J. M., Zucchero, R. A., & Hooker, E. A. (2024). Comparing quantitative outcomes of synchronous online versus in-person interprofessional symposium. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 38(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2023.2241506
Waterston, R. (2011). Interaction in online interprofessional education case discussions. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25(4), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2011.566647
Zheng, B., Ganotice, F. A., Lin, C. H., & Tipoe, G. L. (2023). From self-regulation to co-regulation: Refining learning presence in a community of inquiry in interprofessional education. Medical Education Online, 28(1), 2217549. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2217549
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.




