How Task and Individual Characteristics Affect Students’ Cognitive Load: The Moderating Role of AI-Generated Content
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v27i1.8648Keywords:
task characteristics, individual characteristics, cognitive load, AIGC, structuring equation modeling, online learningAbstract
This study examined how task characteristics (TC) and individual characteristics (IC) affect cognitive load (CL) and how artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) moderates these effects in online learning. Participants included 435 undergraduate students (200 males and 235 females) enrolled in an introductory educational technology course. A structural model, conducted using Mplus software, was employed to test the relationships between each of TC and IC, and CL. Additional analyses explored the moderating role of AIGC on the relationship between TC and CL, the impact of AIGC on the relationship between IC and CL, as well as how these patterns differed by gender. Results revealed that TC positively affected CL, whereas IC exhibited a negative correlation. Moreover, AIGC negatively affected the relationship between TC and CL, but it enhanced the relationship between IC and CL. The moderating role of AIGC differed by gender. Specifically, AIGC positively influenced the connection between IC and CL among males but not females, and it weakened the relationship between TC and CL among females but not males. The implications and limitations are also discussed.
References
Ayers, J. W., Poliak, A., Dredze, M., Leas, E. C., Zhu, Z., Kelley, J. B., Faix, D. J., Goodman, A. M., Longhurst, C. A., Hogarth, M., & Smith, D. M. (2023). Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. Journals of the American Medical Association (Internal Medicine), 183(6), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838
Bai, J., Cheng, X., Zhang, H., Qin, Y., Xu, T., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Can AI-generated pedagogical agents (AIPA) replace human teacher in picture book videos? The effects of appearance and voice of AIPA on children’s learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 12267–12287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13328-8
Bandura, A. (1983). Temporal dynamics and decomposition of reciprocal determinism: A reply to Phillips and Orton. Psychological Review, 90(2), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.2.166
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
Bürgler, S., Troll, E. S., & Hennecke, M. (2024). The context-sensitive use of task enrichment to promote self-control: The role of metacognition and trait self-control. Motivation Science, 10(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000320
Cai, H., Han, B., Sun, J., Li, X., & Wong, L. H. (2025). Harnessing AI for teacher education to promote inclusive education: Investigating the effects of ChatGPT-supported lesson plan critiques on the development of pre-service teachers’ lesson planning skills. The Internet and Higher Education, 67, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101022
Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 105, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003
Chakraborty, S., Kiefer, P., & Raubal, M. (2024). The influence of uncertainty visualization on cognitive load in a safety- and time-critical decision-making task. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 38(8), 1583–1610. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2024.2348747
Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2023). A cognitive load theory approach to defining and measuring task complexity through element interactivity. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09782-w
Chen, X., Hu, Z., & Wang, C. (2024). Empowering education development through AIGC: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 17485–17537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12549-7
Chiappe, A., Díaz, J. M., & Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. (2024). Fostering 4.0 digital literacy skills through attributes of openness: A review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(4), 176–200. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i4.7962
Chong, D. S., Van Eerde, W., Chai, K. H., & Rutte, C. G. (2010). A double-edged sword: The effects of challenge and hindrance time pressure on new product development teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2048914
Cooper, G. (1990). Cognitive load theory as an aid for instructional design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2322
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
Du, L., & Lv, B. (2024). Factors influencing students’ acceptance and use generative artificial intelligence in elementary education: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 24715–24734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12835-4
Feldon, D. F., Brockbank, R., & Litson, K. (2023). Direct effects of cognitive load on self-efficacy during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(7), 1153–1171. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000826
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gandhi, T. K., Classen, D., Sinsky, C. A., Rhew, D. C., Vande Garde, N., Roberts, A., & Federico, F. (2023). How can artificial intelligence decrease cognitive and work burden for front line practitioners? JAMIA Open, 6(3), ooad079. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad079
Gilbert, S. J., Boldt, A., Sachdeva, C., Scarampi, C., & Tsai, P. C. (2023). Outsourcing memory to external tools: A review of ‘intention offloading’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02139-4
Gu, X., & Li, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence promotes the development of future education: Essential connotation and proper direction. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 40(9), 1. https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.09.001
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (1998). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009) Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall
Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jiang, C. (2023). Chinese undergraduates’ English reading self-efficacy, intrinsic cognitive load, boredom, and performance: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1093044. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093044
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
Le Cunff, A. L., Giampietro, V., & Dommett, E. (2024). Neurodiversity and cognitive load in online learning: A systematic review with narrative synthesis. Educational Research Review, 43, 100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100604
Li, J. B. (2010). The synthetic effect of task characteristics and individual characteristics on cognitive load in the human-machine interaction process. Psychological Science, 33(4), 972–975. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2010.04.033
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Lodge, J. M., Yang, S., Furze, L., & Dawson, P. (2023). It’s not like a calculator, so what is the relationship between learners and generative artificial intelligence? Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2261106
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.004
Maynard, D. C., & Hakel, M. D. (1997). Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance. Human Performance, 10(4), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1004_1
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586
Nückles, M., Roelle, J., Glogger-Frey, I., Waldeyer, J., & Renkl, A. (2020). The self-regulation-view in writing-to-learn: Using journal writing to optimize cognitive load in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1089–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09541-1
O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(4), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9941208
Orthey, R., Palena, N., Vrij, A., Meijer, E., Leal, S., Blank, H., & Caso, L. (2019). Effects of time pressure on strategy selection and strategy execution in forced choice tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(5), 974–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3592
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
Paas, F. G., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213420
Packer, B., & Keates, S. (2023). Designing AI writing workflow UX for reduced cognitive loads. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access in human-computer interaction: Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 14021, pp. 306–325). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35897-5_23
Padilla-Meléndez, A., del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63, 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014
Panwale, S. B., & Vijayakumar, S. (2025). Evaluating AI-personalized learning interventions in distance education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(1), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i1.7813
Poupard, M., Larrue, F., Sauzéon, H., & Tricot, A. (2025). A systematic review of immersive technologies for education: Learning performance, cognitive load and intrinsic motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13503
Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Self-efficacy and performance feedback: Impacts on cognitive load during creative thinking. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395
Rosli, M. S., & Saleh, N. S. (2023). Technology enhanced learning acceptance among university students during COVID-19: Integrating the full spectrum of self-determination theory and self-efficacy into the technology acceptance model. Current Psychology, 42(21), 18212–18231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02996-1
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). http://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/index
Rulinawaty, R., Priyanto, A., Kuncoro, S., Rahmawaty, D., & Wijaya, A. (2023). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) as catalysts of change in education during unprecedented times: A narrative review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6697
Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Vollmann, B., & Catrambone, R. (2009). The impact of learner characteristics on information utilization strategies, cognitive load experienced, and performance in hypermedia learning. Learning and Instruction,19(5), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.004
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale [Database record]. APA PsychNet. https://doi.org/10.1037/t00393-000
Seitz, F. I., von Helversen, B., Albrecht, R., Rieskamp, J., & Jarecki, J. B. (2023). Testing three coping strategies for time pressure in categorizations and similarity judgments. Cognition, 233, 105358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105358
Shah, A., & Soosai Raj, A. G. (2024). A review of cognitive apprenticeship methods in computing education research. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Vol. 1, pp. 1202–1208). https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630769
Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Sweller, J. (2006). Discussion of emerging topics in cognitive load research: Using learner and information characteristics in the design of powerful learning environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1251
Tremblay, M. L., Rethans, J. J., & Dolmans, D. (2023). Task complexity and cognitive load in simulation‐based education: A randomised trial. Medical Education, 57(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14941
Urban, M., Děchtěrenko, F., Lukavský, J., Hrabalová, V., Svacha, F., Brom, C., & Urban, K. (2024). ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study. Computers & Education, 215, 105031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031
Wang, C. K, Hu, Z. F., & Liu, Y. (2001). Evidences for reliability and validity of the Chinese version of general self efficacy scale. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 1, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2001.01.007
Wang, D., Liu, Y., Jing, X., Liu, Q., & Lu, Q. (2024). Catalyst for future education: An empirical study on the Impact of artificial intelligence generated content on college students’ innovation ability and autonomous learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13209-6
Wang, T., Li, S., Tan, C., Zhang, J., & Lajoie, S. P. (2023). Cognitive load patterns affect temporal dynamics of self-regulated learning behaviors, metacognitive judgments, and learning achievements. Computers & Education, 207, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104924
Wu, H., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). “To use or not to use?” A mixed-methods study on the determinants of EFL college learners’ behavioral intention to use AI in the distributed learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7708
Xiao, T., Yi, S., & Akhter, S. (2024). AI-supported online language learning: Learners’ self-esteem, cognitive-emotion regulation, academic enjoyment, and language success. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7666
Yang, H.-H. (2024). The Acceptance of AI Tools Among Design Professionals: Exploring the Moderating Role of Job Replacement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7811
Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
Zhai, X., Nyaaba, M., & Ma, W. (2024). Can generative AI and ChatGPT outperform humans on cognitive-demanding problem-solving tasks in science? Science & Education, 34, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00496-1
Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02904-x
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
