A Systematic Literature Review on Trends in the Use of Science Experiments in Online Learning Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i3.8221Keywords:
experiment report, online learning, science experiment, simulation, virtual laboratoryAbstract
Experiments are considered to be essential components of science learning. This research aimed to investigate trends in the use of science experiments in online learning. A systematic literature review was carried out, with data sourced from the Scopus and Google Scholar databases. The reviewed documents were journal articles published between 2015 and 2022, with the keywords “science practicum,” “science experiments,” “distance learning,” “online learning,” and “hands-on science.” Using Harzing’s Publish or Perish software, 970 articles were found but only 32 were reviewed. The literature review followed a procedure adapted from the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA), with articles reviewed based on predetermined criteria such as the year of publication, article source, practicum topics, research subjects, assessment methods, technology, and experiment design in online learning. In the results, various designs for online learning models, the technology used in science experiments, topics addressed, and appropriate assessment methods were identified. Trends included the extensive use of interactive simulation models in online science experiments, the use of virtual laboratories as a crucial technology, and the use of experiment reports to assess students. The analysis showed a sharp increase in the number of publications since the pandemic (2020) and that online science experiments might be carried out effectively by considering the characteristics of the material, matching the science curriculum, and using assessments that fulfill the objectives of science experiments.
References
Accettone, S. L. W. (2022). Student perceptions of remote chemistry laboratory delivery models. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 654–668. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00757
Ali, N., Ullah, S., & Khan, D. (2022). Minimization of students’ cognitive load in a virtual chemistry laboratory via contents optimization and arrow-textual aids. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7629–7652. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-022-10936-6
Ametepe, J. D., & Khan, N. (2020). Teaching physics during COVID-19 pandemic: Implementation and report of teaching strategies to support student learning. Physics Education, 56(6), Article 065030. https://www.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac266f
Andrews, J. L., de Los Rios, J. P., Rayaluru, M., Lee, S., Mai, L., Schusser, A., & Mak, C. H. (2020). Experimenting with at-home general chemistry laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(7), 1887–1894. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00483
Baker, L. A., & Cavinato, A. G. (2020). Teaching analytical chemistry in the time of COVID-19. Analytical Chemistry, 92(15), 10185–10186. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02981
Baldock, B. L., Fernandez, A. L., Franco, J., Provencher, B. A., & McCoy, M. R. (2021). Overcoming the challenges of remote instruction: Using mobile technology to promote active learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(3), 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00992
Beck, C. W., & Blumer, L. S. (2012). Inquiry-based ecology laboratory courses improve student confidence and scientific reasoning skills. Ecosphere, 3(12), Article 112. https://doi.org/10.1890/es12-00280.1
Blumer, L. S., & Beck, C. W. (2019). Laboratory courses with guided-inquiry modules improve scientific reasoning and experimental design skills for the least-prepared undergraduate students. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-08-0152
Brevik, E. C., Ulery, A., & Muise, A. S. (2021). Pivoting to online laboratories due to COVID-19 using the Science of Agriculture digital tools: A case study. Natural Sciences Education, 50(1), Article e20045. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20045
Casaburo, F. (2021). Teaching physics by Arduino during COVID-19 pandemic: The free falling body experiment. Physics Education, 56(6), Article 063001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac1b39
Cesin-AbouAtme, T., Lopez-Almeida, C. G., Molina-Labastida, G., & Ibanez, J. G. (2021). Light-emitting diodes as voltage generators: Demonstrating the fuel cell principle with low-cost, magnetically enhanced, homemade solar electrolysis. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(9), 3045–3049. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00093
Damopolii, I., Paiki, F. F., & Nunaki, J. H. (2022). The development of comic book as marker of augmented reality to raise students’ critical thinking. TEM Journal, 11(1), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM111-44
DeBoer, J., Haney, C., Atiq, S. Z., Smith, C., & Cox, D. (2019). Hands-on engagement online: Using a randomised control trial to estimate the impact of an at-home lab kit on student attitudes and achievement in a MOOC. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(1–2), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1378170
Domínguez, J. C., Miranda, R., González, E. J., Oliet, M., & Alonso, M. V. (2018). A virtual lab as a complement to traditional hands-on labs: Characterization of an alkaline electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Education for Chemical Engineers, 23, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.03.002
Donkin, R., Askew, E., & Stevenson, H. (2019). Video feedback and e-learning enhances laboratory skills and engagement in medical laboratory science students. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), Article 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1745-1
Faulconer, E. K., & Gruss, A. B. (2018). A review to weigh the pros and cons of online, remote, and distance science laboratory experiences. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3386
Foo, C.-c., Cheung, B., & Chu, K.-m. (2021). A comparative study regarding distance learning and the conventional face-to-face approach conducted problem-based learning tutorial during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), Article 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02575-1
Gya, R., & Bjune, A. E. (2021). Taking practical learning in STEM education home: Examples from do-it-yourself experiments in plant biology. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3481–3487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7207
Ha, S., & Kim, M. (2020). Challenges of designing and carrying out laboratory experiments about Newton’s second law: The case of Korean gifted students. Science and Education, 29(5), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00155-1
Hamed, G., & Aljanazrah, A. (2020). The effectiveness of using virtual experiments on students’ learning in the general physics lab. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 977–996. https://doi.org/10.28945/4668
Hasani, L. M., Santoso, H. B., & Junus, K. (2022). Designing asynchronous online discussion forum interface and interaction based on the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i2.6016
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Huang, A. Y. Q., Lu, O. H. T., & Yang, S. J. H. (2023). Effects of artificial intelligence–enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 194, Article 104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104684
Ishafit, I., Indratno, T. K., & Prabowo, Y. D. (2019). Arduino and LabVIEW-based remote data acquisition system for magnetic field of coils experiments. Physics Education, 55(2), Article 025003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab5ed6
Ishafit, Mundilarto, & Surjono, H. D. (2020). Development of light polarization experimental apparatus for remote laboratory in physics education. Physics Education, 56(1), Article 015008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abc4da
Kader, S. N., Ng, W. B., Tan, S. W. L., & Fung, F. M. (2020). Building an interactive immersive virtual reality crime scene for future chemists to learn forensic science chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2651–2656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00817
Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using hands-on and virtual laboratories alone or together―which works better for acquiring knowledge and skills? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9762-0
Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2020). How do different laboratory environments influence students’ attitudes toward science courses and laboratories? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1750075
Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & Koca, E. E. (2022). Comparison of the quality of written scientific arguments in different laboratory environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10147-w
Kier, M. W., & Johnson, L. L. (2022). Exploring how secondary STEM teachers and undergraduate mentors adapt digital technologies to promote culturally relevant education during COVID-19. Education Sciences, 12(1), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010048
Koretsky, M. D. (2020). Re-flipping in the remote classroom: The surprising uptake of video-recorded worked examples. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2754–2759. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00711
Larriba, M., Rodríguez-Llorente, D., Cañada-Barcala, A., Sanz-Santos, E., Gutiérrez-Sánchez, P., Pascual-Muñoz, G., Álvarez-Torrellas, S., Águeda, V. I., Delgado, J. A., & García, J. (2021). Lab at home: 3D printed and low-cost experiments for thermal engineering and separation processes in COVID-19 time. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.02.001
Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), Article 7–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1132960.1132961
Malik, A., & Ubaidillah, M. (2020). Students critical-creative thinking skill: A multivariate analysis of experiments and gender. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 8(Special issue), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-SI-49-58
Malik, A., & Ubaidillah, M. (2021). Multiple skill laboratory activities: How to improve students’ scientific communication and collaboration skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(4), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i4.31442
Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Barnea, N. (2012). Laboratory activities in Israel. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.816a
Manca, S., Persico, D., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2021). Editorial. Emergency remote education: Methodological, technological, organizational and policy issues. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1251
Marinoni, G., van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on higher education around the world: IAU global survey report. International Association of Universities. https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers and Education, 159, Article 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3482
McGreal, R., & Elliott, R. (2008). Technologies of online learning (e-learning). In Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 143–165). https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.01
Mistry, N., & Shahid, N. (2021). Design and delivery of virtual inquiry-based organic chemistry experiments. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(9), 2952–2958. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00571
Müssig, J., Clark, A., Hoermann, S., Loporcaro, G., Loporcaro, C., & Huber, T. (2020). Imparting materials science knowledge in the field of the crystal structure of metals in times of online teaching: A novel online laboratory teaching concept with an augmented reality application. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2643–2650. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00763
Nandana, W. A. R., & de Mel, W. R. (2016). Integrated laboratory experiment setup to empower the engineering education in distance mode. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-06-2016-0007
Nasution, A. K. P. (2022). Education technology research trends in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 36(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2021.36.2.4
Oliveira, A., Feyzi Behnagh, R., Ni, L., Mohsinah, A. A., Burgess, K. J., & Guo, L. (2019). Emerging technologies as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning science: A literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.141
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3), Article e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
Papaneophytou, C. (2020). A distance learning enzyme assay and kinetics laboratory in the time of COVID-19. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(5), 430–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21364
Park, Y., & Doo, M. Y. (2024). Role of AI in blended learning: A systematic literature review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(1), 164–196. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7566
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers and Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
Prahani, B. K., Ramadani, A. H., Kusumawati, D. H., Suprapto, N., Munasir, Madlazim, M., Jatmiko, B., Supardi, Z. A. I., Mubarok., H., Safitri, N. S., & Deta, A. U. (2020). ORNE learning model to improve problem-solving skills of physics bachelor candidates : An alternative learning in the Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 10(01), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v10n1.p71-80
Pratidhina, E., Rosana, D., & Kuswanto, H. (2022). Designing physics hands-on experiment for distance learning using Arduino and block-based programing language. TEM Journal, 11(1), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM111-47
Sajka, M., & Rosiek, R. (2021). Analysis of aspects of visual attention when solving multiple-choice science problems. In Applying Bio-Measurements Methodologies in Science Education Research (pp. 185–215). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71535-9_10
Salta, K., Paschalidou, K., Tsetseri, M., & Koulougliotis, D. (2022). Shift from a traditional to a distance learning environment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: University students’ engagement and interactions. Science and Education, 31(1), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00234-x
Schmidt, S., Wright, Z. M., Eckhart, K. E., Starvaggi, F., Vickery, W., Wolf, M. E., Pitts, M., Warner, T., Taofik, T., Ng, M., Colliver, C., & Sydlik, S. A. (2021). Hands-on laboratory experience using adhesives for remote learning of polymer chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(10), 3153–3162. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01374
Schmuck, V. D. E., Romine, I. C., Sisley, T. A., Immoos, C. E., Scott, G. E., Zigler, D. F., & Martinez, A. W. (2022). At-home microscale paper-based quantitative analysis activity with external standards. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 1081–1086. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01042
Schnell, L. J., Simpson, G. L., Suchan, D. M., Quere, W., Weger, H. G., & Davis, M. C. (2021). An at-home laboratory in plant biology designed to engage students in the process of science. Ecology and Evolution, 11(24), 17572–17580. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8441
Schultz, M., Callahan, D. L., & Miltiadous, A. (2020). Development and use of kitchen chemistry home practical activities during unanticipated campus closures. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2678–2684. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00620
Seifan, M., Dada, D., & Berenjian, A. (2019). The effect of virtual field trip as an introductory tool for an engineering real field trip. Education for Chemical Engineers, 27, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.11.005
Selco, J. I. (2020). Using hands-on chemistry experiments while teaching online. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2617–2623. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0C00424
Setiaji, B., & Santoso, P. H. (2023). An online physics laboratory delivered through live broadcasting media: A COVID-19 teaching experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i1.6684
Sherrer, S. M. (2020). A virtual laboratory module exploring photosynthesis during COVID-19. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(6), 659–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21464
Srisawasdi, N., & Kroothkeaw, S. (2014). Supporting students’ conceptual development of light refraction by simulation-based open inquiry with dual-situated learning model. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0005-y
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers & Education, 144, Article 103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103698
Tsai, C.-W., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2013). Research trends in problem-based learning (PBL) research in e-learning and online education environments: A review of publications in SSCI-indexed journals from 2004 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), E185–E190. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12038
Tsai, C. W., & Fan, Y. T. (2013). Research trends in game-based learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in SSCI-indexed journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12031
Tsai, C.-W., Shen, P.-D., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2013). Research trends in meaningful learning research on e-learning and online education environments: A review of studies published in SSCI-indexed journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), E179–E184. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12035
Tsai, C.-W., Shen, P.-D., & Fan, Y.-T. (2013). Research trends in self-regulated learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), E107–E110. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12017
van Leeuwen, A. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of the usability of learning analytics reports in a flipped university course: When and how does information become actionable knowledge? Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09639-y
Vasiliadou, R. (2020). Virtual laboratories during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(5), 482–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21407
Vijayan, R. (2021). Teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A topic modeling study. Education Sciences, 11(7), 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070347
Widarti, H. R., Rokhim, D. A., Muchson, M., Budiasih, E., Sutrisno, Pratama, R. W., & Hakim, M. I. (2021). Developing integrated triplet multi-representation virtual laboratory in analytic chemical materials. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(8), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i08.21573
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). Physics. PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948
Zulirfan, Iksan, Z. H., Osman, K., & Salehudin, S. N. M. (2018). Take-home-experiment : Enhancing students’ scientific attitude. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 828–837. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1346817.pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
