The Impact of Professional Development on K–12 Teacher Awareness, Use, and Perceptions of OER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i3.8019Keywords:
OER, OEP, K-12 teachers, professional developmentAbstract
This paper reports the findings from cycles three and four in a longitudinal design-based research (DBR) study with K–12 teachers to evaluate their gains in awareness, use, and perceptions about open educational resources (OER) in general and after engaging with the Pathways Project (PP), a repository of 900 world language activities. Two groups of teachers participated in distributed learning with different engagement levels to apply the 5Rs of OER (i.e., retain, reuse, revise, remix, and redistribute), specifically using OER from the PP. The Pathways subscribers (n = 23) attended webinars and received monthly newsletters throughout the project period. A smaller group, referred to as the Pathways training cohort (n = 16), participated in a four-month cohort including a synchronous workshop, monthly synchronous meetings, and asynchronous tasks. The study was conducted in the Mountain West region of the United States, where access to quality teaching materials varies across rural and urban districts, and professional development (PD) opportunities are lacking. The findings revealed that the training cohort self-reported statistically significant increases in awareness of all 5Rs, and increased frequency of revising and remixing OER; their belief in the effectiveness of OER for learning also increased. Conversely, while the subscribers group did show some gains in awareness, use, and perceived value of OER, none of these were statistically significant. These findings suggested that K–12 teachers valued OER but require strategic, long-term PD to achieve gains in awareness, use, and perceived value of OER. This study responded to the challenge of sustaining open pedagogy, particularly for an under-studied K–12 population.
References
Arispe, K., & Hoye, A. (2023a). Accessing and integrating openly licensed digital materials for teaching and learning. In R. E. Ferdig, R. Hartshorne, E. Baumgartner, R. Kaplan-Rakowski & C. Mouza (Eds.), What pre-K–12 teachers should know about educational technology in 2023: A research-to-practice anthology (pp. 417–426). Retrieved July 31, 2023, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/222690/
Arispe, K., & Hoye, A. (2023b). Partnering higher education and K–12 institutions in OER: Foundations in supporting teacher OER-enabled pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i2.6856
Arispe, K., Hoye, A., & Palmer, K. (2023). The impact of open educational resource professional development for teachers in secondary education. Open Praxis, 15(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.4.593
Bannan, B. (2009). The integrative learning design framework: An illustrated example from the domain of instructional technology. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 53–73). SLO-Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
Beaven, T. (2018). ‘Dark reuse’: An empirical study of teachers’ OER engagement. Open Praxis, 10(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.4.889
Blomgren, C. (2018). OER awareness and use: The affinity between higher education and K–12. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3431
de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, R., Weller, M., & McAndrew, P. (2016). Adapting the curriculum: How K–12 teachers perceive the role of open educational resources. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(1), 23–40. Retrieved May 1, 2024, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/151664/
Ganapathi, J. (2019). User-generated content’s impact on the sustainability of open educational resources. Open Praxis, 11(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.2.941
GoOpen National Network [#GoOpen National Network]. (2024, April 30). Navigating the digital divides: A strategic conversation on implementing the NETP [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/hhbdTrmLtg4?si=DulT6rdstNd51Lcw
Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open educational resources. Educational Technology, 55(4), 3–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44430383
Hoye, A. & Arispe, K. (n.d.). Creating an OER ancillary material repository for K–16 teachers: A design case. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education. (2007). #GoOpen National Network. Retrieved May 1, 2024, from https://oercommons.org/hubs/GoOpen
Kimmons, R. (2015). OER quality and adaptation in K–12: Comparing teacher evaluations of copyright-restricted, open, and open/adapted textbooks. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2341
Open Education Global. (2025, November 10–13). OE Global 2025: Connecting the global open education community. OE Global Conference, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Palalas, A., & Hoven, D. (2013). Implications of using DBR to investigate the iterative design of a mobile-enabled language learning system. In J. Rodrigues & C. Pardo-Ballester (Eds.), Design-based research in CALL (CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 11, pp. 41–66). https://www.academia.edu/3607193/Palalas_A_and_Hoven_D_2013_Implications_of_Using_DBR_to_Investigate_the_Iterative_Design_of_a_Mobile_Enabled_Language_Learning_System
Seaman, J. E., & Seaman, J. (2023a). Curricula of many sources: Educational resources in U.S. K–12 education, 2023. Bay View Analytics. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/curricula-of-many-sources-2023.pdf
Seaman, J. E., & Seaman, J. (2023b). Digitally established: Educational resources in U.S. higher education, 2023. Bay View Analytics. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/digitallyestablished-2023.pdf
Tang, H. (2020). A qualitative inquiry of K–12 teachers’ experience with open educational practices: Perceived benefits and barriers of implementing open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4750
Tang, H., & Bao, Y. (2021). Latent class analysis of K–12 teachers’ barriers to implementing OER. Distance Education, 42(4), 582–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1986371
Tang, H., Lin, Y.-J., & Qian, Y. (2021). Improving K–12 teachers’ acceptance of open educational resources by open educational practices: A mixed methods inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3209–3232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10046-z
Van Allen, J., & Katz, S. (2019). Developing open practices in teacher education: An example of integrating OER and developing renewable assignments. Open Praxis, 11(3), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.3.972
Walz, A., & Farley, J. (2023). Making open educational resources with and for pre-K12: A collaboration toolkit for higher education. Virginia Tech Libraries. Retrieved May 1, 2024, from https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/1633
Wiley, D., Webb, A., Weston, S., & Tonks, D. (2017). A preliminary exploration of the relationships between student-created OER, sustainability, and students’ success. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3022
Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J. L. (2018). Defining OER-Enabled Pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The copyright for all content published in IRRODL remains with the authors.
This copyright agreement and usage license ensure that the article is distributed as widely as possible and can be included in any scientific or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.




