The Effects of Duolingo, an AI-Integrated Technology, on EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate and Engagement in Online Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7677Keywords:
AI-integrated technology, AI, Duolingo, willingness to communicate, engagement, online class, EFLAbstract
This study, which is quasi-experimental in nature, looks into how language learners’ willingness to communicate and engagement in English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms are affected by Duolingo. The control and experimental groups comprised two complete classes with forty EFL students. To compare learner engagement and communication willingness scores before and after treatment, the study used independent samples t-tests. The results demonstrated the groups’ initial homogeneity by showing no discernible differences prior to the intervention. The results confirmed the effects on learner engagement, which showed significant gains in affective, cognitive, and behavioral domains, indicating Duolingo’s beneficial impact on engagement in general. Furthermore, the significant effect sizes observed confirmed Duolingo’s contribution to improved language attitudes, engagement, and communicative confidence. Compared to the control group, the experimental group’s willingness to speak, read, write, comprehend, and communicate generally improved in a manner that was statistically significant. The significant effect sizes demonstrate how well Duolingo works to improve different aspects of willingness to share. The study emphasizes the pedagogical tool’s adaptability and encourages teachers to integrate Duolingo for a comprehensive and technologically enhanced language learning experience. Practical implications arise for EFL teachers who use online learning resources.
References
Adilbayeva, U., Mussanova, G. A., Mombekova, N. B., & Suttibayev, N. A. (2022). Digital communication technology for teaching a foreign language and culture through reading. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 10(3), 21–30. https://www.ijscl.com/article_252481_8ed1f0934dafd81701135be0fca47728.pdf
Ahmed, S. (2017). Impact and implementation of sociocultural theory in ESL classroom [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. BRAC University.
Alfuhaid, S. R. (2021). The utilization of Duolingo to enhance the speaking proficiency of EFL secondary school students in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 14(11), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n11p9
Alibakhshi, G., & Mohammadi, M. J. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous multimedia and Iranian EFL learners’ learning of collocations. Applied Research on English Language, 5(2), 237–254. https://www.doi.org/10.22108/ARE.2016.20428
Anugerahwati, M. (2023). Can Duolingo help people master a foreign language? KnE Social Sciences, 8(7), 133–139. https://www.doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i7.13244
Arumsari, & Octaviani, S. K. (2022). Duolingo mobile application for English listening skill improvement of vocational school students. Journal of English Language and Education, 7(2), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v7i2.306
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Avcı, Ü., & Ergün, E. (2022). Online students’ LMS activities and their effect on engagement, information literacy, and academic performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 71–84. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636088
Bain, S. K., McCallum, R. S., Bell, S. M., Cochran, J. L., & Sawyer, S. C. (2010). Foreign language learning aptitudes, attitudes, attributions, and achievement of postsecondary students identified as gifted. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(1), 130–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1002200106
Blake, R. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning (2nd ed.). Georgetown University Press.
Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 129–142. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44465
Campolo, A., & Crawford, K. (2020). Enchanted determinism: Power without responsibility in artificial intelligence. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6(2020), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.277
Carneiro, R., & Simao, A. M. V. (2011). Technology-enhanced environments for self-regulated learning in teaching practices. In R. Carneiro, P. Lefrere, K. Steffens, & J. Underwood (Eds.), Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: A European perspective (pp. 75–101). Sense Publishers.
Crompton, H. (2013). The benefits and challenges of mobile learning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 41, 38–39.
Dawson, S., Poquet, O., Colvin, C., Rogers, T., Pardo, A., & Gasevic, D. (2018). Rethinking learning analytics adoption through complexity leadership theory. In A. Pardo, K. Bartimote-Aufflick, & G. Lynch (Chairs), LAK ’18: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 236–244). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170375
Dewaele, J. M., & Dewaele, L. (2018). Learner-internal and learner-external predictors of willingness to communicate in the F.L. classroom. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 2(1), 24–37. https://www.doi.org/10.22599/jesla.37
Eccles, J. & Wang, M. T. (2012) So, what is student engagement anyway? In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie ( Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.133-145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_6
Feng, S., & Law, N. (2021). Mapping artificial intelligence in education research: A network-based keyword analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(2), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00244-4
Gibson, D., Kovanovic, V., Ifenthaler, D., Dexter, S., & Feng, S. (2023). Learning theories for artificial intelligence promoting learning processes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1125–1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13341
Gobert, J. D., Baker, R. S., & Wixon, M. B. (2015). Operationalizing and detecting disengagement within online science microworlds. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.999919
Habibie, A. (2020). Duolingo as an educational language tool to enhance EFL students’ motivation in learning. British (Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris), 9(1), 13–26. https://dx.doi.org/10.31314/british.9.1.13-26.2020
Hakimantieq, H., Suherdi, D., & Gunawan, W. (2022). Duolingo as a mobile-assisted language learning: A new supplementary of learning basic English reading for EFL students. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(6), 7548–7558. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i6.4104
Hernadijaya, N. S. (2020). The use of Duolingo application to enhance junior high school students’ English vocabulary. RETAIN, 8(2), 17–24. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/retain/article/view/33055
Huang, J., Gu, S. S., Hou, L., Wu, Y., Wang, X., Yu, H., & Han, J. (2022). Large language models can self-improve. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.11610
Irzawati, I. (2023). The integration of Duolingo into EFL learning. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(2), 328-337. DOI:10.31851/esteem.v6i2.12317
Keegan, D. (2002). The future of learning: From e-learning to m-learning. Zentrales Institut für Fernstudienforschung, Fern Universität. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED472435.pdf
Ketonen, E. E., Malmberg, L.-E., Salmela-Aro, K., Muukkonen, H., Tuominen, H., & Lonka, K. (2019). The role of study engagement in university students' daily experiences: A multilevel test of moderation. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.001
Khajavy, G. H., Makiabadi, H., & Navokhi, S. A. (2019). The role of psychological capital in language learners' willingness to communicate, motivation, and achievement. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguisitcs, 5(3), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.651346
King, R. B. (2015). Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: A latent growth model study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.002
Klopfer, E., Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2002). Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world. In B. Werner (Ed.), Proceedings: IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 95–98). IEEE Computer Society. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/WMTE.2002.1039227
Kruk, M. (2022). Dynamicity of perceived willingness to communicate, motivation, boredom and anxiety in second life: The case of two advanced learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1–2), 190–216. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1677722
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lee, J. S., & Hsieh, J. C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63–73. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.002
Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233–247. https://www.doi.org/10.1037/a0021307
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001
MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in an L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
MacIntyre, P. D., & Vincze, L. (2017). Positive and negative emotions underlie motivation for L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 61–88. https://www.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.4
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2017). Willingness to communicate in instructed second language acquisition: Combining a macro- and micro-perspective. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783097173
Nushi, M., & Eqbali, M. H. (2017). Duolingo: A mobile application to assist second language learning. The Journal of Teaching English with Technology, 17(1), 89–98. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=478437
Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004). Context-aware support for computer-supported ubiquitous learning. In B. Werner (Ed.), Proceedings: The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 27–34). IEEE Computer Society. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/WMTE.2004.1281330
Öz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Willingness to communicate with EFL learners in the Turkish context. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 269–275. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.009
Perez, L. C. D. (2020). English language acquisition via Duolingo application: Effectivity and challenges. Lingua Pedagogia: Journal of English Teaching Studies, 2(2), 76–87. C:UsersshendersonCopyarticles4 https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/lingua-pedagogia/article/view/37984/0
Ratzlaff, N. J. (2015). A cross-comparison and efficacy study of Duolingo and an entry-level German 1A course [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. California State University.
Redjeki, I. S., & Muhajir, R. (2021). Gamification in EFL classroom to support teaching and learning in 21st century. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.882
Poureau, L., & Wright, J. (2013). Owning It: An evaluation of language applications and software for second language acquisition mastery. Online Submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED542662
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Scott, S., & Palincsar, A. (2013). Sociocultural theory. IXL Learning. http://dr-hatfield.com/theorists/resources/sociocultural_theory.pdf
Selwyn, N. (2022). Digital degrowth: Toward radically sustainable education technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2159978
Stanley, G. (2013). Language learning with technology: Ideas for integrating technology in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 217–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00129.x
Tsai, Y.-S., Poquet, O., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Pardo, A. (2019). Complexity leadership in learning analytics: Drivers, challenges, and opportunities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2839–2854. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12846
Ünal, E., & Güngör, F. (2021). The continuance intention of users toward mobile assisted language learning: The case of DuoLingo. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5811777
Vesselinov, R., & Grego, J. (2012). Duolingo effectiveness study: Final report. City University of New York. https://www.languagezen.com/pt/about/english/Duolingo_Efficacy_Study.pdf
Wagner, E. (2005). Enabling mobile learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(3), 41–52. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2005/5/enabling-mobile-learning
Walker, A., & White, G. (2013) Technology enhanced language learning. Oxford University Press. https://elt.oup.com/catalogue/items/global/teacher_development/oxford_handbooks_for_language
Yang, S. J. H. (2006). Context-aware ubiquitous learning environments for peer-to-peer collaborative learning. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 188–201. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220374333
Yunus, M. M., Lubis, M. A., Lin, C. P., & Wekke, I. S. (2009). Language learning via ICT: Students’ experience. In Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Educational Technologies (EDUTE'09; pp. 136-142). https://www.academia.edu/1562306/LANGUAGE_LEARNING_VIA_ICT_STUDENTS_EXPERIENCE
Yunus, M. M., Sulaiman, N. A., & Embi, M. A. (2013). Malaysian gifted students’ use of English language learning strategies. English Language Teaching, 6(4), 97–109. https://www.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n4p97
Yunus, M. M., Sulaiman, A., Kamarulzaman, M. H., & Ishak, N. M. (2013). Language learning difficulties among Malaysian gifted students. Asian Social Science, 9(15), 130–137. https://www.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n15p130
Zarei, N., Saeidi, M., & Ahangari, S. (2019). Exploring EFL teachers’ socio-affective and pedagogic strategies and students’ willingness to communicate with a focus on Iranian culture. Hindawi Education Research International, 2019, Article 3464163. https://www.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3464163
Zhang, J., Beckmann, N., & Beckmann, J. F. (2018). To talk or not to talk: A review of situational antecedents of willingness to communicate in the second language classroom. System, 72, 226–239. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.01.003
Zheng, C., & Fisher, L. (2023). Opening the “black box”: How out-of-class use of Duolingo impacts Chinese junior high school students’ intrinsic motivation for English. ECNU Review of Education. Advance online publication. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/20965311231171606
Zhou, Q., Main, A., & Wang, Y. (2010). The relations of temperamental effortful control and anger/frustration to Chinese children’s academic achievement and social adjustment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1),180–196 https://www.doi.org/10.1037/a0015908
Zhou, Y., Muresanu, A. I., Han, Z., Paster, K., Pitis, S., Chan, H., & Ba, J. (2022). Large language models are human-level prompt engineers. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01910
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
