Teammate Familiarity in Distributed Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: The Mediating Role of Social Presence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7332Keywords:
distributed computer-supported collaborative learning, social presence, teamwork satisfaction, learning outcomes, teammate familiarityAbstract
Owing to the limitations of computer-mediated communication (CMC), distributed CSCL (Computer-supported collaborative learning) has not always been as effective as desired. Despite recognizing the significance of group composition, the exploration of the function of teammate familiarity in distributed educational settings is restricted. This study explored the influence of teammate familiarity and social presence in a distributed CSCL setting by conducting an online survey of 288 Korean university students with experience in distributed CSCL. The results indicate that teammate familiarity increased the social presence experienced by students among their peers. Social presence subsequently enhanced teamwork satisfaction and, ultimately, increased self-assessed knowledge gain. More importantly, the relationship between teammate familiarity and teamwork satisfaction was mediated by social presence. Social media platforms and class webpages were the most widely used channels for students to get to know their teammates. Our study provided insights for improving the effectiveness of distributed CSCL and a framework for investigating social presence in satisfaction building in various contexts, including online education.
References
Adams, S. J., Roch, S. G., & Ayman, R. (2005). Communication medium and member familiarity: The effects on decision time, accuracy, and satisfaction. Small Group Research, 36(3), 321–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405275232
Al-Samarraie, H., & Saeed, N. (2018). A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: Opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Computers & Education, 124, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.016
Anderson, P., Bergman, B., Bradley, L., Gustafsson, M., & Matzke, A. (2010). Peer reviewing across the Atlantic: Patterns and trends in L1 and L2 comments made in an asynchronous online collaborative learning exchange between technical communication students in Sweden and in the United States. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(3), 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651910363270
Bacon, D. R., Sauer, P. L., & Young, M. (1995). Composite reliability in structural equations modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(3), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055003003
Baturay, M. H., & Toker, S. (2019). The comparison of trust in virtual and face-to-face collaborative learning teams. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.601929
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
Caceffo, R., Goncalves, D. A., Bonacin, R., dos Reis, J. C., Valente, J. A., & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2022). Children’s social interactions within a socioenactive scenario . Computers & Education, 176, 18, Article 104324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104324
Castellá, V. O., Abad, A. Z., Alonso, F. P., & Silla, J. P. (2000). The influence of familiarity among group members, group atmosphere and assertiveness on uninhibited behavior through three different communication media. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00012-1
Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799–843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584
Child, J. T. & Petronio, S. (2011). Unpacking the paradoxes of privacy in CMC relationships: The challenges of blogging and relational communication on the Internet. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 21–40). Peter Lang. https://urlzs.com/4Xqgt
Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., Alstad, Z., & Banerjee, M. (2020). Comparing synchronous and asynchronous online discussions for students with disabilities: The impact of social presence. Computers & Education, 150, Article 103842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103842
De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., De Smedt, F., Merchie, E., & Valcke, M. (2022). Identifying regulation profiles during computer-supported collaborative learning and examining their relation with students’ performance, motivation, and self-efficacy for learning. Computers & Education, 179, Article 104421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104421
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Elsevier. https://urlzs.com/yzg9h
Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3–19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_1
Falcione, S., Campbell, E., McCollum, B., Chamberlain, J., Macias, M., Morsch, L., & Pinder, C. (2019). Emergence of different perspectives of success in collaborative learning. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8227
Farland, M. Z., Feng, X., Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Beck, D. E. (2019). Impact of team formation method on student team performance across multiple courses incorporating team-based learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(6). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7030
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Friedman, L. W., & Friedman, H. (2013). Using social media technologies to enhance online learning. Journal of Educators Online, 10(1), 1–22. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/114389/
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Goh, C., Leong, C., Kasmin, K., Hii, P., & Tan, O. (2017). Students’ experiences, learning outcomes and satisfaction in e-learning. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(2). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/188116/
Gress, C. L., Fior, M., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 806–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.012
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
Harasim, L. M. (1993). Networlds: Networks as social space. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Global networks: Computers and international communication (pp. 15–34). MIT Press. https://urlzs.com/pVByX
He, J., & Huang, X. (2017). Collaborative online teamwork: Exploring students’ satisfaction and attitudes with Google Hangouts as a supplementary communication tool. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1327334
Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P.-C., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Computers & Education, 138, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012
Hinds, P. J., Carley, K. M., Krackhardt, D., & Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(2), 226–251. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2875
Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2006). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1–12. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1670
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2009). Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.010
Jeong, H., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Jo, K. (2019). Ten years of computer-supported collaborative learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005–2014. Educational Research Review, 28, Article 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284
Kalina, C., & Powell, K. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241–250. https://docdrop.org/static/drop-pdf/Powell-and-Kalina-U6g4p.pdf
Khan, K. A., & Rafi, S. (2020). Online education & MOOCs: Teacher self-disclosure in online education and a mediating role of social presence. South Asian Journal of Management, 14(1), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.21621/sajms.2020141.08
Kim, J., & Song, H. (2016). Celebrity’s self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: A mediating role of social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.083
Kim, J., Song, H., & Luo, W. (2016). Broadening the understanding of social presence: Implications and contributions to the mediated communication and online education. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 672–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.009
Kim, K. J., Park, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2013). Caregiving role in human–robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1799–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.009
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford. https://urlzs.com/TZ4H9
Kline, T. J. B. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage. https://urlzs.com/VCEvf
Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2152644
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 8–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.5.1.8
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
Ku, H.-Y., Tseng, H. W., & Akarasriworn, C. (2013). Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.019
Lee, K. M., Jeong, E. J., Park, N., & Ryu, S. (2011). Effects of interactivity in educational games: A mediating role of social presence on learning outcomes. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27(7), 620–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555302
Lo, S.-K. (2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(5), 595–597. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0132
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), Article JCMC321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
Nam, C. W. (2017). The effects of digital storytelling on student achievement, social presence, and attitude in online collaborative learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1135173
Pauwels, K., Demirci, C., Yildirim, G., & Srinivasan, S. (2016). The impact of brand familiarity on online and offline media synergy. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(4), 739–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.12.008
Post, M. L., Barrett, A., Williams, M., & Scharff, L. (2020). Impact of team formation method on student performance, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v20i1.24128
Roberts, T. S. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education (pp. 1–18). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-408-8.ch001
Rockett, T. L., & Okhuysen, G. A. (2002). Familiarity in groups: Exploring the relationship between inter-member familiarity and group behavior. In H. Sondak (Ed.), Toward phenomenology of groups and group membership (Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 4) (pp. 173–201). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-0856(02)04008-2
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
Song, H., Kim, J., & Lee, K. M. (2014). Virtual vs. real body in exergames: Reducing social physique anxiety in exercise experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.059
Song, H., Kim, J., & Luo, W. (2016). Teacher–student relationship in online classes: A role of teacher self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 436–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.037
Song, H., Kim, J., & Park, N. (2019). I know my professor: Teacher self-disclosure in online education and a mediating role of social presence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(6), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455126
Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
Surani, D., & Hamidah, H. (2020). Students perceptions in online class learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, and Religion, 3(3), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.33648/ijoaser.v3i3.78
Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y
Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136. https://urlzs.com/sTsE7
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. http://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Tseng, H., & Ku, H. (2011). The relationships between trust, performance, satisfaction, and development progressions among virtual teams. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 81–94. https://urlzs.com/kzYsE
Tseng, H., Ku, H.-Y., Wang, C.-H., & Sun, L. (2009). Key factors in online collaboration and their relationship to teamwork satisfaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2). https://goo.su/043Q05
Tseng, H., Morris, B., & Tang, Y. (2015). The importance of teamwork trust, social presence, and cognitive presence in an online collaborative learning environment. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015—Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 538–541). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/150048/
Van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, Article 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003
Vaterlaus, J. M., Shaffer, T., & Pulsipher, L. (2021). College student interpersonal and institutional relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative exploratory study. The Social Science Journal, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1949553
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
Zhang, S., Che, S., Nan, D., & Kim, J. H. (2023). How does online social interaction promote students’ continuous learning intentions? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1098110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1098110
Zhang, S., Che, S., Nan, D., Li, Y., & Kim, J. H. (2023). I know my teammates: the role of Group Member Familiarity in Computer-Supported and face-to-face collaborative learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11704-w
Zheng, W., Yu, F., & Wu, Y. J. (2022). Social media on blended learning: The effect of rapport and motivation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(9), 1941–1951. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1909140
Zhonggen, Y., Ying, Z., Zhichun, Y., & Wentao, C. (2019). Student satisfaction, learning outcomes, and cognitive loads with a mobile learning platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(4), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1517093
Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127–136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.15.1.127
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
