Weaknesses in Emergency Remote Teaching in Higher Education Within the Context of the ODL Learning Component in Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7276Keywords:
weaknesses in emergency remote teaching, ERT, open and distance learning, ODL, higher education, crisis, COIVID-19Abstract
In critical situations caused by crises such as a pandemic, emergency remote teaching (ERT) practices might not be effective because they depend mostly on on-the-spot decision-making. On the other hand, open and distance learning (ODL) has its own dynamics and is a well-planned system. In order to put quality ODL plans into practice in crisis situations, contingency plans, created before any crises, are required. Past crises ought to be examined in order to cope with future crises effectively. This study aims to identify weaknesses in ERT practices in higher education within the context of the learning component of ODL system by focusing on COVID-19 and using it as an example of a past crisis. Exploratory case study was the method used. The study group consisted of 14 faculty and 14 learners from 14 higher education institutions. Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews and documents. The data were analyzed using descriptive and content analysis. Research findings revealed that ERT has many weaknesses in several themes within the context of the learning component of the ODL system; these include teaching method, course structuring, and e-learning materials, among others. In light of the findings, it can be concluded that many factors influence challenges in ERT. Accordingly, to be able to move from ERT to ODL in the next crisis, these weaknesses need to transform into solutions in advance.
References
Alasmari, T. (2021). Learning in the COVID-19 era: Higher education students and faculty’s experience with emergency distance education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(9), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.20711
Arayüz Kampanyası. (2020). Üniversitelerin uzaktan eğitim süreçlerinin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of distance education processes in universities]. https://arayuzkampanyasi.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Universitelerin-Uzaktan-Egitim-Sureclerinin-Degerlendirmesi.pdf
Baltacı, A. (2017). Nitel veri analizinde Miles-Huberman modeli [Miles-Huberman model in qualitative data analysis]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(1), 1–15. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/aeusbed/issue/30008/290583
Burns, M. (2020, April 1). School, interrupted: 4 options for distance education to continue teaching during COVID-19. Global Partnership for Education. https://www.globalpartnership.org/blog/school-interrupted-4-options-distance education-continue-teaching-during-covid-19
Chierichetti, M., & Backer, P. (2021). Exploring faculty perspectives during emergency remote teaching in engineering at a large public university. Education Sciences, 11(8), Article 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080419
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Eby, G. (2013). Uzaktan eğitim ortamlarının tasarımı: Yazılım mühendisliği yaşam döngüsü yaklaşımı [Design of distance learning environments: Software development life cycle]. Kültür Ajans.
Frangou, M.-S., & Keskitalo, P. (2020). Enhancing social learning through digital applications—Life stance education and Sámi pedagogy move to synchronous distance learning in teacher education. In R. E. Ferdig, E. Baumgartner, R. Hartshorne, R. Kaplan-Rakowski, & C. Mouza (Eds.), Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field (pp. 23–26). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903/
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23, Article 26507. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
Kaya, Y., & Işık, R. (2021). COVID-19 pandemisi’nin ilk döneminde uygulanan zorunlu uzaktan eğitim sisteminin hemşirelik eğitimine katkısı ve zorlukları: nitel bir çalışma [The contribution and challenges of the implemented compulsory distance education system to nursing education in the first period of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study]. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 18(Supp. 1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.5152/jern.2021.67365
Karadağ, E., & Yücel, C. (2021). Uzaktan eğitim Türkiye üniversite memnuniyet araştırması [TÜMA] 2021 [Distance Education Turkey University Satisfaction Survey]. Üniar Yayınları. https://f903aba4-e11a-4804-93a8-aa17928bdbe0.filesusr.com/ugd/779fe1_9715270bbb264da3b51ec6c34c622322.pdf
Kürtüncü, M., & Kurt, A. (2020). COVID-19 pandemisi döneminde hemşirelik öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitim konusunda yaşadıkları sorunlar [Problems of nursing students in distance education in the COVID-19 pandemia period]. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(5), 66–77. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/asead/issue/54658/725503
Lassoued, Z., Alhendawi, M., & Bashitialshaaer, R. (2020). An exploratory study of the obstacles for achieving quality in distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences 10(9), Article 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090232
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36 (COVID19-S4), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785
O’Keefe, L., Rafferty, J., Gunder, A., Vignare, K. (2020, May 18). Delivering high-quality instruction online in response to COVID-19: Faculty playbook. Every Learner Everywhere. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/tools/delivering-high-quality-instruction-in-response-to-covid-19-faculty-playbook/
Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112
Omodan, B. I. (2020). The vindication of decoloniality and the reality of COVID-19 as an emergency of unknown in rural universities. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 1–26. http://doi.org/10.17583/rise.2020.5495
Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2006). Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 320, Article 114. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114
Sarı, T., Yeşilyaprak, T., Sert, H. P., Demirhan, H., Koçyiğit, D., Kebapcı, T. Y., & Öztürk, M. H. (2022). Bir meslek yüksekokulunda pandemi sürecinde uzaktan eğitimin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of distance education in a vocational school in the pandemic]. Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.29228/JOHSE.15
Schlesselman, L. S. (2020). Perspective from a teaching and learning center during emergency remote teaching. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(8), 1042–1044. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8142
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., & Zvacek, S. (2015). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (6th ed.). Information Age Publishing. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tld/
Sindiani, A. M., Obeidat, N., Alshdaifat, E., Elsalem, L., Alwani, M. M., Rawashdeh, H., Fares, A. S., Alalawne, T., & Tawalbeh, L. I. (2020). Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 59, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.036
Song, L., Cai, Q., Hong, H., Liu, X., Jin, L., & Li, Q. (2020). Professional learning under the pandemic: A self-study of five teachers educators’ experiences of transitioning to emergency remote teaching. In R. E. Ferdig, E. Baumgartner, R. Hartshorne, R. Kaplan-Rakowski, & C. Mouza (Eds.), Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field (pp. 151–156). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903/
Tabor, J. W. (2021). Chaos: Exploring an engaging online model for rapid application during the pandemic. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09878-y
Valsaraj, B. P., More, B., Biju, S., Payini, V., & Pallath, V. (2021). Faculty experiences on emergency remote teaching during COVID-19: A multicentre qualitative analysis. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2020-0198
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin Yayınevi.
Yin, K. R. (1981). The case study as a serious research strategy. Knowledge, 3(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106
Yin, K. R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Yin, K. R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Yükseköğretim Kalite Kurulu (YÖKAK). (2020, July 7). Pandemi döneminde uzaktan eğitim [Distance education during the pandemic]. https://portal.yokak.gov.tr/makale/pandemi-doneminde-uzaktan-egitim/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
