The Online PhD Experience: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Abstract
The online doctoral population is growing steadily worldwide, yet its narratives have not been thoroughly reviewed so far. We conducted a systematic review summarizing online PhD students’ experiences. ERIC, WoS, Scopus, and PsycInfo databases were searched following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and limiting the results to peer-reviewed articles of the last 20 years, yielding 16 studies eligible. A thematic synthesis of the studies showed that online PhD students are generally satisfied with their programs, but isolation, juggling work and family roles, and financial pressures are the main obstacles. The supervisory relationship determines the quality of the experience, whereas a strong sense of community helps students get ahead. Personal factors such as motivation, personality, and skills modulate fit with the PhD. We conclude that pursuing a doctorate online is more isolating than face to face, and students might encounter additional challenges regarding the supervision process and study/life balance. Accordingly, this review might help faculty, program managers, and prospective students better understand online doctorates’ pressing concerns such as poor well-being and high dropout rates.
References
Akojie, P., Entrekin, F., Bacon, D., & Kanai, T. (2019). Qualitative meta-data analysis: Perceptions and experiences of online doctoral students. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 3(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5814
Andrew, M. (2012). Supervising doctorates at a distance: Three trans‐Tasman stories. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211198239
Barnes, B. J., & Randall, J. (2012). Doctoral student satisfaction: An examination of disciplinary, enrollment, and institutional differences. Research in Higher Education, 53(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9225-4
Baltes, B., & Brown, M. (2018). Impact of additional early feedback on doctoral capstone proposal approval. International Journal of Online Graduate Education, 1(2), 2–11. https://ijoge.org/index.php/IJOGE/article/view/21
Being a PhD student shouldn’t be bad for your health [Editorial]. (2019). Nature, 569(7756), 307. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01492-0
Berg, G. A. (2016). The dissertation process and mentor relationships for African American and Latina/o students in an online program. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(4), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1227191
Brown, C. G. (2017). The persistence and attrition of online learners. School Leadership Review, 12(1), 47–58. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1277006.pdf
Burrus, S. W. M., Fiore, T. D., Shaw, M. E., & Stein, I. F. (2019). Predictors of online doctoral student success: A quantitative study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 22(4), 61–66. https://www.westga.edu/~distance/dla/pdf/2019-dla-proceedings.pdf#page=61
Byrd, J. (2016). Understanding the online doctoral learning experience: Factors that contribute to students’ sense of community. The Journal of Educators Online, 13(2), 102–135. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2016.2.3
Castelló, M., Pardo, M., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Suñe-Soler, N. (2017). Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. Higher Education, 74(6), 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9
Conrad, D. (2005). Building and maintaining community in cohort-based online learning. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 20(1), 1–20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ807822.pdf
Erichsen, E. A., Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2014). Student satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs primarily delivered in distance education settings. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709496
Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature Biotechnology, 36(3), 282–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4089
Fiore, T. D., Heitner, K. L., & Shaw, M. (2019). Academic advising and online doctoral student persistence from coursework to independent research. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 22(3). https://ojdla.com/archive/fall223/fiore_heitner_shaw223.pdf
Gardner, S. K., & Gopaul, B. (2012). The part-time doctoral student experience. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 63–76.
Gatrell, C. (2002). Mission impossible: Doing a part time PhD, (or getting 200% out of 20%) – is it really worth it? In N. Greenfield (Ed.), How I got my postgraduate degree part time (pp. 85–95). Lancaster University.
Golde, C. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. The Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2000.0004
Gough, D., & Thomas, J. (2016). Systematic reviews of research in education: Aims, myths and multiple methods. Review of Education, 4(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3068
Gray, M. A., & Crosta, L. (2019). New perspectives in online doctoral supervision: A systematic literature review. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1532405
Halter, M. J., Kleiner, C., & Hess, R. F. (2006). The experience of nursing students in an online doctoral program in nursing: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.03.001
Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed-methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93–135. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
Jameson, C., & Torres, K. (2019). Fostering motivation when virtually mentoring online doctoral students. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2019.09.1.23
Kelley, M. J. M., & Salisbury-Glennon, J. D. (2016). The role of self-regulation in doctoral students’ status of all but dissertation (ABD). Innovative Higher Education, 41(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-015-9336-5
Kennedy, E., & Gray, M. (2016). ‘You’re facing that machine but there’s a human being behind it’: Students’ affective experiences on an online doctoral programme. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(3), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1175498
Kumar, S., Johnson, M., & Hardemon, T. (2013). Dissertations at a distance: Students’ perceptions of online mentoring in a doctoral program. Journal of Distance Education, 27(1), 1–11. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1426932680
Lee, K. (2020). A phenomenological exploration of the student experience of online PhD studies. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 15, 575–593. https://doi.org/10.28945/4645
Litalien, D., & Guay, F. (2015). Dropout intentions in PhD studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.004
Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Madan, C. R. (2021). A brief primer on the PhD supervision relationship. European Journal of Neuroscience, 54(4), 5229–5234. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15396
Madhlangobe, L., Chikasha, J., Mafa, O., & Kurasha, P. (2014). Persistence, perseverance, and success: A case study to describe motivational factors that encourage Zimbabwe Open University students to enroll, persist, and graduate with master’s and doctorate credentials. SAGE Open, 4(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014544291
Marston, D., Gopaul, M., & Kenney, J. (2019). Issues to consider for online doctoral candidates utilizing meta-analysis for dissertations. International Journal of Online Graduate Education, 2(1), 2–16. https://ijoge.org/index.php/IJOGE/article/view/30
Natal, M., Jimenez, R., & Htway, Z. (2020). Lived experiences of Asian and Latinx online doctoral students. American Journal of Distance Education, 35(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1793642
Naylor, R., Chakravarti, S., & Baik, C. (2018). Expectations and experiences of off-campus PhD students in Australia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(4), 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1301405
Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to PhD. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Offerman, M. (2011). Profile of the nontraditional doctoral degree student. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2011(129), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.397
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), Article 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372(160). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Rigler, K. L., Bowlin, L. K., Sweat, K., Watts, S., & Throne, R. (2017, March 21–23). Agency, socialization, and support: A critical review of doctoral student attrition [Paper presentation]. 3rd International Conference on Doctoral Education, University of Central Florida, Orlando, United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580853.pdf
Sakurai, Y., Pyhältö, K., & Lindblom‐Ylänne, S. (2012). Factors affecting international doctoral students’ academic engagement, satisfaction with their studies, and dropping out. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511311316964
Sakurai, Y., Vekkaila, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). More or less engaged in doctoral studies? Domestic and international students’ satisfaction and motivation for doctoral studies in Finland. Research in Comparative and International Education, 12(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499917711543
Spurlock, C. & Cunningham, M. (2016). Socialization and retention of part-time doctoral students: A review of ten years of literature. In S. Whalen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th National Symposium on Student Retention, Norfolk, Virginia (pp. 372–383). University of Oklahoma. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Socialization-and-Retention-of-Part-Time-Doctoral-A-Spurlock/d6cdfeb80f48db2b01b18f942474e3909b4e332b
Studebaker, B., & Curtis, H. (2021). Building community in an online doctoral program. Christian Higher Education, 20(1–2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2020.1852133
Sverdlik, A., Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00346543045001089
Vossensteyn, H., Kottmann, A., Jongbloed, B. W. A., Kaiser, F., Cremonini, L., Stensaker, B., Hovdhaugen, E., & Wollscheid, S. (2015). Dropout and completion in higher education in Europe: Main report. European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/826962
Xavier, M., & Meneses, J. (2021). The tensions between student dropout and flexibility in learning design: The voices of professors in open online higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(4), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i1.5652
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
