What We Talk About When We Talk About Virtual Learning Environments
This is a literature review analysing articles published on virtual learning environments (VLEs), otherwise known as learning management systems, in higher education in the years 2014–2018. The Web of Science database was used to identity relevant articles over this five-year period. The sample comprises 99 peer-reviewed, academic journal articles. A coding sheet is used to analyse each article, identifying the research method, the classification of research (macro, meso, or micro), the focus of research (students, instructors, or both), and, where applicable, the specific brand of VLE. Most output on VLEs is found to be quantitative, to focus on students and on the micro level of learning and teaching, to not have a clear theoretical focus, to not specify which brand of VLE is used, and to be produced in affluent countries. This article adds to the understanding of VLE research by identifying the most frequent foci of research on VLEs, as well as identifying areas that have been under-researched.
Baydas, O., Kucuk, S., Yilmaz, R. M., Aydemir, M., & Goktas, Y. (2015). Educational technology research trends from 2002 to 2014. Scientometrics, 105(1), 709–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1693-4
Benner, M. J., & Tripsas, M. (2012). The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal, 33(3), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.950
Castaneda, L. & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(22). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y
Cobo, A., Rocha, R., & Rodriguez-Hoyos, C. (2014). Evaluation of the interactivity of students in virtual learning environments using a multicriteria approach and data mining. Behaviour and Information Technology, 33(10), 1000–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.853838
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
de Oliveira, P. C., Cunha, C. J. C., & Nakayama, M. K. (2016). Learning management systems (LMS) and e-learning management: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 13(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752016000200001
Dutton, W. H., Cheong, P. H., & Park, N. (2004). An ecology of constraints on e-learning in higher education: The case of a virtual learning environment. Prometheus, 22(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0810902042000218337
Farrelly, T., Raftery, D., & Harding, N. (2018). Exploring lecturer engagement with the VLE: Findings from a multi-college staff survey. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning. https://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/2669
Ferreira, G. M. D. S., Rosado, L. A. D. S., Lemgruber, M. S., & Carvalho, J. D. S. (2020). Metaphors we’re colonised by? The case of data-driven educational technologies in Brazil. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1666872
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
Fry, N., & Love, N. (2011). Business lecturers’ perceptions and interactions with the virtual learning environment. International Journal of Management Education, 9(4), 51–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3794/ijme.94.325
Gordon, N. (2014). Flexible pedagogies: Technology-enhanced learning. Higher Education Academy. https://www.hv.se/globalassets/dokument/stodja/paper-theme-3.pdf
Hsu, Y. C., Hung, J. L., & Ching, Y. H. (2013). Trends of educational technology research: More than a decade of international research in six SSCI-indexed refereed journals. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9290-9
Hung, J. L. (2012). Trends of e‐learning research from 2000 to 2008: Use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01144.x
Jenkins, M., Walker, R., & Voce, J. (2018). The rhetoric and reality of technology-enhanced learning developments in UK higher education: Reflections on recent UCISA research findings (2012-2016). Interactive Learning Environments, 26, 858-868.
Jones, C. R. (2014). The politics of networked learning in an age of austerity. In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & C Sinclair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 170–177). http://ljmu-test.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/150/
Langer-Crame, M., Newman, T., Beetham, H., Killen, C., & Knight, S. (2019, January). Digital experience insights survey 2019: Findings from students in UK further and higher education. JISC. http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/7202/1/digital-experience-insights-survey-anz-2018.pdf
Latchem, C. (2006). Editorial: A content analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00635.x
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/ca/academic/subjects/psychology/developmental-psychology/situated-learning-legitimate-peripheral-participation?format=PB&isbn=9780521423748
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality (Trans. M. J. Hall). Prentice Hall. https://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1978/activity-consciousness-personality.pdf
Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Progress Publications.
McGill, T. J., & Hobbs, V. J. (2008). How students and instructors using a virtual learning environment perceive the fit between technology and task. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00253.x
Moccia, S. (2016). Managing educational reforms during times of transition: The role of leadership. Higher Education for the Future, 3(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631115611278
Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2010). Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic institutions: The organizational perspective. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.004
Newman, T., Beetham, H., & Knight, S. (2018). Digital experience insights survey 2018: Findings from students in UK further and higher education. JISC. https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6967/1/Digital_experience_insights_survey_2018.pdf
Ngai, E. W., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education, 48(2), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007
Oliver, M. (2011). Learning technology: Theorising the tools we study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01283.x
Oproiu, G. C. (2015). A study about using e-learning platform (Moodle) in university teaching process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.140
Paulsen, M. F. (2003). Experiences with learning management systems in 113 European institutions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 6(4), 134–148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.6.4.134.pdf
Pinner, R. (2014). What is the difference between an LMS and a VLE? eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/difference-between-lms-and-vle
Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Lygo-Baker, S., & Ma, H. W. S. (2016). Why some teachers easily learn to use a new virtual learning environment: A technology acceptance perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.881394
Risquez, A., Raftery, D., & Costello, E. (2015). The open dataset on students’ perceptions of virtual learning environments in Ireland: Collaborating to listen to the student voice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1070–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12323
Rodriguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). What leads people to keep on e-learning? An empirical analysis of users’ experiences and their effects on continuance intention. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1030-1053.
Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJCR). (2018). Subject category: E-learning. https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=3399&wos=true
Segooa, M. A., & Kalema, B. M. (2015). Virtual learning environments for higher learning institutions in developing countries. In 2015 Fifth International Conference on e-Learning (pp. 353–359). https://doi.org/10.1109/ECONF.2015.67
Shih, M., Feng, J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: A content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals. Computers & Education, 51(2), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.004
Sosa, E., Salinas, J., & De Benito, B. (2019). Emerging technologies (ETs) in education: A systematic review of the literature published between 2006 and 2016. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(5), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i05.6939
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-02001-000
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50, 838–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Zawacki-Richter, O., Bäcker, E. M., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741
Zeide, E., & Nissenbaum, H. (2018). Learner privacy in MOOCs and virtual education. Theory and Research in Education, 16(3), 280-307.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.