Ukrainian E-Learning Platforms for Schools: Evaluation of Their Functionality

Keywords: e-learning platform, evaluation, functional suitability, open and distance education, learning theories


This article defines 27 criteria for evaluating the functionality of e-learning platforms, grouped into three macro groups: (a) learning management, (b) learning content management, and (c) communications and collaboration tools. The proposed criteria can be used to evaluate any e-learning platform’s functionality. They allow teachers and administrators to make conscious choices about the highest-quality e-learning platform for their schools and developers to improve e-learning platforms’ functionality. The developed criteria became the basis for rating the functionality of Ukrainian developers’ eight e-learning platforms' and determining the degree of support (in whole or partly) of e-learning components, categorized on the cognitive, social constructivist, motivation, and e-learning theories (CT, SCT, MT, and E-LT). The results indicate that the lack of communication and collaboration tools necessary to ensure quality distance learning is the main problem of Ukrainian e-leaning platforms. Comparative analysis of the functionality of e-learning platforms and components categorized on the learning theories helped determine that only three of the eight Ukrainian e-learning platforms (Accent [Mobischool], Class Assessment, My Class) fully follow the CT, SCT, and MT, but these platforms are all commercial products; therefore, they only partially support the E-LT. Solving this problem will be facilitated by developing e-learning platforms with open access, financed by the state budget in the context of the development of open and distance learning for Ukrainian students, as well as improving communication and collaboration tools in the context of conforming e-learning components to the social constructivist learning theory.


Abubakari, M. S., Nurkhamid, & Hungilo, G. (2021). Evaluating an e-learning platform at graduate school based on user experience evaluation technique. c, 1737, Article 012019.

Baggia, А., Leskovar, R., Rajkovič, U., Šmitek, B., Pesjak, K., Saša, M., Ravnik, S., Valjavec, M., Kingston, L., Murphy, F., Coffey, A., Narduzzi, B., Lillo-Crespo, M., & Riquelme, J. (2019, March 20–22). Selecting the e-learning platform for nursing education. In P. Šprajc, I. Podbregar, D. Maletič, & M Radovanović (Eds.), 38th International Conference on Organizational Science Development: Ecosystem of organizations in the digital age: Conference proceedings (pp. 49–63). University of Maribor, University Press.

Colace, F., De Santo, M., & Vento, M. (2002). Evaluating on-line learning platforms: A case study. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’03) (pp. 1–9). IEEE Computer Society.

Ecoutin, E. (2000). Étude comparative technique et pédagogique des plates-formes pour la formation ouverte et à distance. Fonds Social Européen. 1712/filename/synt08.pdf

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2011). Systems and software engineering—Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)—System and software quality models (ISO standard no. 25010:2011). ISO/International Electrotechnical Commission.

Kumar, V., & Sharma, D. (2021). E-learning theories, components, and cloud computing-based learning platforms. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 16(3), Article 1.

Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2020). All-Ukrainian Online School.

Ouadoud, M., Chkouri, M. Y., Nejjari, A., & El Kadiri, K. E. (2016a). Studying and analyzing the evaluation dimensions of e-learning platforms relying on a software engineering approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(1), 11–20.

Ouadoud, M., Chkouri, M. Y., Nejjari A., & El Kadiri, K. E. (2016b). Studying and comparing the free e-learning platforms. In 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt) (pp. 581–586). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

Pandu, F., & Fajar, A. N. (2019). E-learning implementation using user experience questionnaire. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1367, Article 012015.

Parchure, N. P. (2016). “E-learning”—A boon for distance education. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 2(10), 63–66.

Piotrowski, M. (2010). What is an e-learning platform? In Y. Kats (Ed.), Learning management system technologies and software solutions for online teaching: Tools and applications (pp. 20–36). IGI Global.

Rodrigues, M., Schneider, A., Sokolovic, N., Brunsek, A., Oré, B., Perlman, M., & Jenkins, J. (2021). Development and evaluation of an open-source, online training for the measurement of adult–child responsivity at home and in early childhood education and care settings. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(3), 1–18.

Schrepp, M. (2015). User experience questionnaire handbook.

Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories. An educational perspective. Pearson.

Tomczyk, Ł., Włoch, A., Potyrała, K., Wn˛ek-Gozdek, J. & Demeshkant, N. (2020). Evaluation of the functionality of a new e-learning platform vs. previous experiences in e-learning and the self-assessment of own digital literacy. Sustainability, 12(23), Article 10219.

UNESCO. (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery.

Zhenchenko, M., Melnyk, O., Miroshnychenko, V., and Zhenchenko, V. (2020). Electronic textbooks for Ukrainian education: Statistics, models of development, quality problems. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (pp. 721–733).

How to Cite
Zhenchenko, M., Melnyk, O., Prykhoda, Y., & Zhenchenko, I. (2022). Ukrainian E-Learning Platforms for Schools: Evaluation of Their Functionality. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(2), 136-150.
Research Articles