“They Have to Combine the Future of the University and Their Own Future”: OpenCourseWare (OCW) Authoring as an Academic Practice in Spain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i2.5765Keywords:
OpenCourseWare, OCW, open educational resources, OER, open educational practices, OEP, open education, higher education, universities, SpainAbstract
This study looks at OpenCourseWare (OCW) in Spain, a country where most public universities have tried to promote that particular model of open educational resources (OER) provision among academics. Using three universities with varying levels of OCW activity as a case study, this article examines key drivers behind the implementation of OCW initiatives and unpacks what it means, as an academic practice, to engage in OCW authoring. Following a qualitative case study approach and a multi-methods design, this study offers a basis for theoretical generalisations that can be useful for understanding similar dynamics taking place within different organisational contexts in Spain and beyond. The findings reveal a major disconnect between the drive to implement OCW initiatives in Spain and actual opportunities for academics to engage with them as part of their work. The author concludes that the extrapolation of a highly prescriptive model of OER provision into institutional realities different from the context where it was originally devised—in this case, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States—is rather problematic. The article also provides some recommendations to university leaders and policy makers, encouraging the creation of alternative models that are mindful of the institutional and cultural specificities of their own contexts and also to take into consideration the social and material realities of the communities they aim to provide with lifelong learning opportunities.
References
Abelson, H. (2008). The creation of OpenCourseWare at MIT. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9060-8
Abelson, H., Miyagawa, S., & Yue, D. K. P. (2021, May 24). On the 20th anniversary of OpenCourseWare: How it began. MIT Faculty Newsletter, 33(5). https://fnl.mit.edu/may-june-2021/on-the-20th-anniversary-of-opencourseware-how-it-began/
Andrews, R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE handbook of e-learning research. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-sage-handbook-of-e-learning-research/book243430
Aranzadi, P., & Capdevila, R. (2011). Open Course Ware, recursos compartidos y conocimiento distribuido. La Cuestión Universitaria, 7, 126–133. http://polired.upm.es/index.php/lacuestionuniversitaria/article/view/3398
Borrás Gené, O. (2010). Observatorio de plataformas para OCW. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cachia, R., Aldaoud, M., Eldeib, A., Hiari, O., Tweissi, A., Villar-Onrubia, D., Wimpenny, K., & Maya, I. (2020). Cultural diversity in the adoption of open education in the Mediterranean basin: Collectivist values and power distance in the universities of the Middle East. Araucaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política, Humanidades y Relaciones Internacionales, 22(44), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2020.i44.03
Carson, S. (2009). The unwalled garden: Growth of the OpenCourseWare Consortium, 2001–2008. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510802627787
Carson, S., & Forward, M. L. (2010). Development of the OCW Consortium. In 2010 IEEE Education Engineering (EDUCON) (pp. 1657–1660). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492401
Clifton, J., Díaz Fuentes, D., Fernández Gutiérrez, M., & Revuelta López, J. (2013). Difusión del proyecto OpenCourseWare—Universidad de Cantabria en asignaturas relativas a la economía mundial. In M. A. Bringas Gutiérrez, M. Fernández Gutiérrez, & M. Fernández Redondo (Eds.), XV Reunión de Economía Mundial / Sociedad de Economía Mundial (pp. 5–10). Universidad de Cantabria. http://hdl.handle.net/10902/4425
Cox, G. (2013). Researching resistance to open education resource contribution: An activity theory approach. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.2.148
Creanor, L., & Walker, S. (2012). Learning technology in context: A case for the sociotechnical interaction framework as an analytical lens for networked learning research. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning (pp. 173–187). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5_10
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-13099-000
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 1–19). Sage Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/40425_Chapter1.pdf
Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2021). Lifelong learning and the Internet: Who benefits most from learning online? British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13041
Falconer, I., Littlejohn, A., McGill, L., & Beetham, H. (2016). Motives and tensions in the release of open educational resources: The UKOER program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2258
Frías-Navarro, M. D., Pascual Llobell, J., Monterde i Bort, H., Pascual Soler, M., Badenes Ribera, L., & Pascual Mengual, J. (2010). Impacto del Open Course Ware (OCW) en los docentes universitarios. Universidad de Valencia/Ministerio de Educación. https://perma.cc/H49P-UFTZ
Gallardo Paúls, B. (2008). Teaching and open access: The Open Course Ware of the Universitat de València. @tic. Revista d’innovació Educativa, 1, 16–25. http://ojs.uv.es/index.php/attic/article/view/45
Hatakka, M. (2009). Build it and they will come?—Inhibiting factors for reuse of open content in developing countries. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 37(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00260.x
Henderson, S., & Ostashewski, N. (2018). Barriers, incentives, and benefits of the open educational resources (OER) movement: An exploration into instructor perspectives. First Monday, 23(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i12.9172
King, M., Pegrum, M., & Forsey, M. (2018). MOOCs and OER in the Global South: Problems and potential. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3742
Kling, R. (2007). What is social informatics and why does it matter? The Information Society, 23(4), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240701441556
Kling, R., McKim, G., & King, A. (2003). A bit more to it: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10154
Knox, J. (2013). Five critiques of the open educational resources movement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.774354
Kursun, E., Cagiltay, K., & Can, G. (2014). An investigation of faculty perspectives on barriers, incentives, and benefits of the OER movement in Turkey. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1914
Lerman, S. R., & Miyagawa, S. (2002). OpenCourseWare: A case study in institutional decision making. Academe, 88(5), 23–27. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ655807
Lerman, S. R., Miyagawa, S., & Margulies, A. H. (2008). OpenCourseWare: Building a culture of sharing. In T. Iiyoshi & M. S. V. Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge (pp. 213–227). MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/opening-education
Llorens, F., Bayona, J. J., Gómez, J., & Sanguino, F. (2010). The University of Alicante’s institutional strategy to promote the open dissemination of knowledge. Online Information Review, 34(4), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011072981
Llorente Cejudo, M. del C., Cabero Almenara, J., Vázquez Martínez, A. I., & Alducín Ochoa, J. M. (2013). Proyecto OpenCourseWare y su implantación en universidades andaluzas, 12(1), 11–21. http://dehesa.unex.es/handle/10662/724
Lloyd, M. (2011, July 10). Billion-dollar benefactor for campuses in Latin America: A Spanish bank. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/billion-dollar-benefactor-for-campuses-in-latin-america-a-spanish-bank/
McCoy, C., & Rosenbaum, H. (2019). Uncovering unintended and shadow practices of users of decision support system dashboards in higher education institutions. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 70(4), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24131
Meyer, E. T., Shankar, K., Willis, M., Sharma, S., & Sawyer, S. (2019). The social informatics of knowledge. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(4), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24205
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97407-000
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades. (2019). Datos y cifras del sistema universitario Español 2018-2019 (Data and figures of the Spanish university system 2018-2019). Gobierno de España. https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:2af709c9-9532-414e-9bad-c390d32998d4/datos-y-cifras-sue-2018-19.pdf
Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211644
Peter, S., & Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23
Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033
Ros, S., Hernández, R., Read, T., Rodrı, M., Pastor, R., & Dı, G. (2014). UNED OER experience: From OCW to open UNED. IEEE Transactions on Education, 57(4), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2014.2331216
Santos-Hermosa, G., Estupinyà, E., Nonó-Rius, B., Paris-Folch, L., & Prats-Prat, J. (2020). Open educational resources (OER) in the Spanish universities. Profesional de la Información, 29(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.37
Selwyn, N. (2013). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Distrusting-Educational-Technology-Critical-Questions-for-Changing-Times/Selwyn/p/book/9780415708005
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-art-of-case-study-research/book4954
Tovar, E., López, J., Piedra, N., Sancho, E., & Soto, Ó. (2013). Aplicación de tecnologías Web emergentes para el estudio del impacto de repositorios OpenCourseWare españoles y latinoamericanos en le Educación Superior. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid & Gobierno de España. http://ocw.uc3m.es/informe-final-ocw.pdf/at_download/file
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries—Final report. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001285/128515e.pdf
Villar-Onrubia, D. (2014). The value of Web mentions as data: Mapping attention to the notion of OER in the HE arena. In M. Sánchez & E. Romero Frías (Eds.), Ciencias sociales y humanidades digitales técnicas, herramientas y experiencias de e-research e investigación en colaboración (pp. 163–181). Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:0aac8efd-f100-4a06-9fe5-7a1d849120bf
Wei, H.-C., & Chou, C. (2021). Ready to do OpenCourseWare? A comparative study of Taiwan college faculty. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 118–142. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5252
White, S., White, S., & Borthwick, K. (2020). Blended professionals, technology and online learning: Identifying a socio‐technical third space in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(1), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12252
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.worldcat.org/title/case-study-research-design-and-methods/oclc/50866947
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
