University Students’ Persistence With Technology-Mediated Distance Education: A Response to COVID-19 and Beyond in Zimbabwe

  • Norman Rudhumbu Faculty of Science Education, Bindura University of Science Education
Keywords: flexible learning, information and communication technologies, online education, technology advances, technology-mediated distance education


Technology-mediated distance education (TDE) has become part of the new normal in the range of teaching strategies used in universities in Zimbabwe. Contemporary literature abounds with studies that highlight challenges associated with access to education in universities, yet very little is highlighted about how TDE can be used to enhance access to education in Zimbabwean universities during the COVID-19 era and beyond. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate determinants of students’ behavioural intentions to persist with TDE in universities in Zimbabwe during COVID-19 and beyond. The study employed a quantitative approach that used a self-constructed structured questionnaire for data collection from a sample of 1,300 distance learning students selected from five universities using a stratified random sampling strategy. Structural equation modelling using IBM SPSS Amos 22 was used for data analysis. Results of the study show that cultural and norms issues (β = .325; p < .001) and characteristics of the students (β = .329; p < .001), the lecturer (β = .362; p < .001), the institution (β = .427; p < .001), and external stakeholders (β = .279; p < .001) were all significantly associated with the behavioural intentions of university students to persist with TDE. Results of this study have implications for both policy and practice with regard to implementing TDE in universities.


Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journalof Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

Au, O. T., Li, K., & Wong, T. M. (2019). Student persistence in open and distance learning:Success factors and challenges. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(2), 191–202.

Bagozzi, R. P. (1984). A prospectus for theory construction in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 48(1), 11–29.

Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.

Base, C. (2018). Understanding basic statistics (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855.

Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39, 299–316.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments in nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2015), Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson.

Ettekal, A. V, & Mahoney, J. L. (2017). Ecological systems theory. In K. Peppler (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of out-of-school learning (pp. 10–12). Sage Publishing.

Exploring Your Mind. (2020). IT trends in education for 2020.

Fenske, M. (2007). Movement and resistance: (Tattooed) bodies and performance. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 4(1), 51–73.

Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyka, O., & Lencastre, J. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(18), 1–18.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

Gao, S., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Johnston, R. A. (2008). Nonnormality of data in structural equation models. Transportation Research Record, 2082(1), 116–124.

Guy-Evans, O. (2020, November 9). Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. Simply Psychology.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

Houlden, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2019). A posthumanist critique of flexible online learning and its “anytime anyplace” claims. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 1005–1018.

Ilieva, J., Steve B., & Nigel, M. H. (2002). Online surveys in marketing research: Pros and cons. International Journal of Market Research, 44(3), 361–382.

Joyce, M., & Kirakowski, J. (2015). Measuring attitudes towards the Internet: The general Internet attitude scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(8), 506–517.

Kaputa, T. M. (2013). Making open and distance learning inclusive: The Zimbabwe Open University’s experience with people with disabilities. Greener Journal of Educational Research, 3(8), 392–401.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Krebs, R. J. (2009). Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Theory of Human Development and the process of development of sports talent. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 40(1), 108–135.

Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. (2019). Factors related to student persistence in open universities: Changes over the years. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(4).

Lindemann, N. (2021, August 9). What’s the average survey response rate? [2021 benchmark]. Survey Anyplace.

Liu, Q., Geertshuis, S., & Grainger, R. (2020). Understanding academics' adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 1-19.

Maphosa, V. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on remote-based teaching and learning in the COVID-19 era: Rethinking technology availability and suitability in Zimbabwe. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(1), Article e02105.

McGhie, V. (2017). Entering university studies: Identifying enabling factors for a successful transition from school to university. Higher Education Journal, 73(3), 407–422.

McLeod, S. A. (2019). Z-score: Definition, calculation and interpretation. Simply Psychology.

Musingafi, M. C. C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Zebron, S. (2015). Challenges for open and distance learning (ODL) students: Experiences from students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 59–66.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.

Ouma, R. (2019). Transforming university learner support in open and distance education: Academic staff and students perceived challenges and prospects. Cogent Education, 6, 1 – 15.

QuestionPro. (2020). What is a good survey response rate?

The Research Advisors. (2006). Sample size table.

Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2020). How to prevent, detect and control common method variance in electronic commerce research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 1–5.

Rosenberg, J., & Ranellucci, J. (2017, May 8). Student motivation in online science courses: A path to spending more time on course and higher achievement. Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute Blog.

Rudhumbu, N. (2020). Antecedents of university lecturers’ intentions to adopt information and communication technology in Zimbabwe. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5117–5132.

Rupande, G., & Nyenya, T. (2014). Accessibility and affordability of ODL in Zimbabwe: A reality or a myth? International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 1(4), 21–29.

SAIDE. (1999). An overview of distance education in Zimbabwe. Southern Africa Global Distance Education Net.

Selwyn, N. (1997). Students’ attitudes toward computers: Validation of a computer attitude scale for 16–19 education. Computers & Education, 28(1), 35–41.

Sharma, R. C. (2018). Is open and distance education ready for the digital innovations? Distance Education in China, 8, 31–45. DOI:10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.20180525.001

Sinclair, M., O’Toole, J., Malawaraarachchi, M., et al. (2012). Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 132. on 17 March 2021.

Tait, A. (2018). Education for development: From distance to open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2), 101–115.

Tam, G., & El-Azar, D. (2020). 3 ways the coronavirus pandemic could reshape education. World Economic Forum: Global agenda. file:///D:/COVID/3%20ways%20the%20coronavirus%.

UNESCO. (2018). ICT transforming education in Africa: UNESCO-KFIT project update, February 2018.

UNESCO. (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery.

Vanides, J. (2018). Let’s talk online learning. The New Media Consortium (NMC).

World Health Organization (WHO). (2009). Changing cultural and social norms that support violence.

Yang, D., Baldwin, S., & Snelson, C. (2017). Persistence factors revealed: Students’ reflections on completing a fully online program. Distance Education, 38(1), 23–36.

How to Cite
Rudhumbu, N. (2021). University Students’ Persistence With Technology-Mediated Distance Education: A Response to COVID-19 and Beyond in Zimbabwe. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(4), 89-108.
Research Articles