Trends and Patterns in Distance Education (2014–2019): A Synthesis of Scholarly Publications and a Visualization of the Intellectual Landscape
The field of distance education (DE) is dynamic and constantly evolving; it reflects and adapts according to changes in socio-cultural, demographic, political, and technological domains. Thus, there is a need to understand past and present activities in the field, in order to better inform future research. The main purpose of this study was to examine DE research through data mining and analytics approaches, using social network analysis (SNA) and text mining to conduct a bibliographic analysis. The findings highlighted three main strands of DE research: (a) issues related to open education; (b) the design, support, and quality assurance of online DE; and (c) the implementation and use of educational technology, media, and digital tools. SNA of the bibliometric data identified pivotal theoretical contributions, including that the fields of distance education and educational technology converge. The article concludes with recommendations for future research directions.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Berge, Z. L., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527090
Bozkurt, A. (2019). Intellectual roots of distance education: A progressive knowledge domain analysis. Distance Education, 40(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1681894
Bozkurt, A. (2020). Educational technology research patterns in the realm of the digital knowledge age. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.570
Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbek, E., Onrat-Yilmazer, S., Erdogdu, E., Ucar, H., Guler, E., Sezgin, S., Karadeniz, A., Sen-Ersoy, N., Goksel-Canbek, N., Dincer, G. D., Ari, S., & Aydin, C. H. (2015). Trends in distance education research: A content analysis of journals 2009–2013. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 330–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1953
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020a). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020b). Education in normal, new normal, and next normal: Observations from the past, insights from the present and projections for the future. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), i–x. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4362664
Braun, T. (2008). Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 63–92. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/j/JTATE/
Çakiroğlu, Ü., Kokoç, M., Gökoğlu, S., Öztürk, M., & Erdoğdu, F. (2019). An analysis of the journey of open and distance education: Major concepts and cutoff points in research trends. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3743
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
Conley, Q., Lutz, H. S., & Padgitt, A. J. (2017). Creating participatory online learning environments: A social learning approach revisited. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 28(1), 5–27. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133397
Dalsgaard, C., & Thestrup, K. (2015). Dimensions of openness: Beyond the course as an open format in online education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2146
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3). https://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dillon, C. L., Gunawardena, C. N., & Parker, R. (1992). Learner support: The critical link in distance education. Distance Education, 13(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791920130104
Fayyad, U., Grinstein, G. G., & Wierse, A. (Eds.). (2002). Information visualization in data mining and knowledge discovery. Morgan Kaufmann.
Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2007). The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge University Press.
Fisher, M., & Baird, D. E. (2005). Online learning design that fosters student support, self‐regulation, and retention. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 22(2), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740510587100
Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Gomes, R. R., & Barbosa, M. W. (2018). An analysis of the structure and evolution of the distance education research area community in terms of coauthorships. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 16(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2018040105
Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2010). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann.
Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses. Working Paper No. 1. Harvard University.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Jung, I. (Ed.). (2019). Open and distance education theory revisited: Implications for the digital era. Springer.
Keegan, D. (1980). On defining distance education. Distance Education, 1(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791800010102
Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013, April). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 170–179). https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330
Koseoglu, S., Bozkurt, A., & Havemann, L. (2020). Critical questions for open educational practices. Distance Education, 41(2). 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1775341
Lambert, S. R. (2020). Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014–18. Computers & Education, 145, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103693
Latchem, C. R. (2018). Open and distance non-formal education in developing countries. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6741-9
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Y., Driscoll, M. P., & Nelson, D. W. (2004). The past, present, and future of research in distance education: Results of a content analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1804_4
Lemoine, P. A., & Richardson, M. D. (2015). Micro-credentials, nano degrees, and digital badges: New credentials for global higher education. International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing, 5(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtem.2015010104
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
Luo, T., Hostetler, K., Freeman, C., & Stefaniak, J. (2019). The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222
Mishra, S. (2017). Open educational resources: Removing barriers from within. Distance Education, 38(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369350
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage.
Naidu, S. (2019). Forty years of pushing the boundaries of education. Distance Education, 40(4), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1693952
O’Connell, J. (2016). Networked participatory online learning design and challenges for academic integrity in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-016-0009-7
Perraton, H. (2000). Rethinking the research agenda. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v1i1.5
Robinson, H., Al-Freih, M., & Kilgore, W. (2020). Designing with care: Towards a care-centered model for online learning design. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-10-2019-0098
Scott, J. (2017). Social network analysis (4th ed.). Sage.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. eLearnspace. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
Sim, K. N. (2017). Researching distance education: A possibility to humanize it. In M. Northcote & K. Gosselin (Eds.), Handbook of research on humanizing the distance learning experience (pp. 26–47). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0968-4.ch002
Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M. S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192778
Tait, A. (2008). What are open universities for? Open Learning, 23(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510802051871
Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x
van der Maaten, L., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9(2008), 2579–2605. http://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume9/vandermaaten08a/vandermaaten08a.pdf
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Xiao, J. (2018). On the margins or at the center? Distance education in higher education. Distance Education, 39(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1429213
Youssef, L. (2014). Globalisation and higher education: From within-border to cross-border. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.932686
Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Centre for Educational Technology & Interoperability Standards. https://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf
Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Anderson, T. (2011). The geography of distance education: Bibliographic characteristics of a journal network. Distance Education, 32, 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610287
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in Computers & Education. Computers & Education, 122, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.001
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Naidu, S. (2016). Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in Distance Education. Distance Education, 37(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1185079
Zawacki-Richter, O., Baecker, E. M., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741
Zawacki-Richter, O., Conrad, D., Bozkurt, A., Aydin, C. H., Bedenlier, S., Jung, I., Stöter, J., Veletsianos, G., Blaschke, L. M., Bond, M., Broens, A., Bruhn, E., Dolch, C., Kalz, M., Kondakci, Y., Marin, V., Mayrberger, K., Müskens, W., Naidu, S., ... Xiao, J. (2020). Elements of open education: An invitation to future research. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4659
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.