Analysis of Success Indicators in Online Learning

  • Ermira Idrizi Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
  • Sonja Filiposka Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
  • Vladimir Trajkovijk Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
Keywords: online education, character traits, learning styles, academic success, gender

Abstract

This article examines the impact of personality traits, learning styles, gender, and online course factors (course difficulty, group affiliation, provided materials, etc.) in the academic success of students taking online courses and their overall success rate through traditional classes. Students’ performance in the online learning environment is still a new perception, and a fair numbers of details are still unknown, in stark contrast to the details known in regard to traditional learning methods. Different types of learners respond differently to online and traditional courses. A case study was performed in which students were asked to attend two online courses, with different difficulty levels, during one semester. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine which factors are significant for the academic performance of students taking online courses, as well as for their overall academic success. Findings from the case study indicate that female students score slightly better, course difficulty has impact on test results, emotional students are more susceptible to online environments, and learning styles are more difficult to identify in online classes.

Author Biographies

Ermira Idrizi, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia

Ermira Idrizi obtained her B.S degree in Computer Science and Engineering in 2009 at the South East European University in Tetovo, and M.SC in 2014 in Business Informatics. She has been working in the field of IT in the education sector, with different levels of pupils and students'. Now she is an assistant professor at the South East European University, and currently a PhD candidate at the Faculty of Computer Science, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje. Her field of research is online learning, MOOCS, Digital Competency of students' and teachers and has authored some research papers related to these fields.

Sonja Filiposka, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia

Sonja Filiposka obtained her B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering in 2003 she has been actively taking part in a number of research projects related to e-infrastructure, networking and ICT education. After obtaining her PhD in Technical Sciences in 2009 she teaches Computer Science at the Faculty of Computer Sciences and Engineering where she currently holds the position of full professor. During her professional carrier she has authored over 100 research papers published in conference proceedings and journals. Her main research fields of interest include e-services, orchestration of systems, complex networking and security.

Vladimir Trajkovijk, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia

Vladimir Trajkovik is a full professor at the Faculty of Computer Science, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje. Since obtaining his PhD in 2003 from the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies he has been actively taking part in a more than 50 research projects related to novel ICT services in e-government, healthcare and ICT in education.  He has co-founded three companies and two NGOs. During his professional carrier, he has authored over 200 research papers published in conference proceedings and journals. His main research fields of interest include e-government, connected health and ICT in education.

References

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Sloan Consortium. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529948.pdf

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital compass learning: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580868.pdf

Altanopoulou, P., & Tselios, N. (2018). Big Five personality traits and academic learning in wiki-mediated collaborative activities: Evidence from four case studies. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 16(3), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.2018070105

Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191

Beer, C., Clark, K., & Jones, D. (2010). Indicators of engagement. In C. H. Steel, M. Keppell, P. Gerbic, & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology and transformation for an unknown future: Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 75–86). http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Beer-full.pdf

Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. (Eds.). (2015). MOOCs and open education around the world. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315751108

Bozkurt, A. (2019). From distance education to open and distance learning: A holistic evaluation of history, definitions, and theories. In Handbook of research on learning in the age of transhumanism (pp. 252–273). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8431-5.ch016

Clark, J. T. (2020). Distance education. In E. Iadanza (Ed.), Clinical engineering handbook (2nd ed., pp. 410–415). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813467-2.00063-8

Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7

Cronje, Johannes C. (2018) Learning 3.0: Rhizomatic implications for blended learning. In K. Persichitte, A. Suparman, & M. Spector (Eds.), Educational technology to improve quality and access on a global scale (pp. 9–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66227-5_2

Cuadrado-García, M., Ruiz-Molina, M. E., & Montoro-Pons, J. D. (2010). Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.027

Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-i

Davies, R. S., & West, R. E. (2018). Technology integration in schools. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 841–853). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_68

Diseth, Å. (2013). Personality as an indirect predictor of academic achievement via student course experience and approach to learning. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(8), 1297–1308. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.8.1297

Downes, S. (2020). Recent work in connectivism. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 22(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2019-0014

Essien, A. M. (2015). Effectiveness of cooperative learning methodology in improving students’ learning attitudes towards English language. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8(2), 119–127. http://www.universitypublications.net/ijas/0802/html/DE4C352.xml

Faulconer, E. K., Griffith, J. C., Wood, B. L., Acharyya, S., & Roberts, D. L. (2018). A comparison of online and traditional chemistry lecture and lab. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 392–397. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00173h

Figlio, D. N., Rush, M., & Yin, L. (2010). Is it live or is it Internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning (Working Paper 16089). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w16089

Fleming, N. D. (1987). VARK inventory. Retrieved January, 20, 2003 https://vark-learn.com/introduction-to-vark/the-vark-modalities/

Fleming, N., & Baume, D. (2006). Learning styles again: VARKing up the right tree! Educational Developments, 7(4), 4–7. https://www.vark-learn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Educational-Developments.pdf

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x

Geng, S., Law, K. M., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0

Glazier, R. A., Hamann, K., Pollock, P. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2020). Age, gender, and student success: Mixing face-to-face and online courses in political science. Journal of Political Science Education, 16(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1515636

Harvey, H. L., Parahoo, S., & Santally, M. (2017). Should gender differences be considered when assessing student satisfaction in the online learning environment for millennials? Higher Education Quarterly, 71(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12116

Henderikx, M., Kreijns, K., Castano Munoz, J., & Kalz, M. (2019). Factors influencing the pursuit of personal learning goals in MOOCs. Distance Education, 40(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600364

Howie, D. (2011). Teaching students thinking skills and strategies: A framework for cognitive education in inclusive settings. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. https://www.ibs.it/teaching-students-thinking-skills-strategies-libro-inglese- dorothy-howie/e/9781843109501

Husmann, P. R., & O’Loughlin, V. D. (2019). Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disparities among undergraduate anatomy students’ study strategies, class performance, and reported VARK learning styles. Anatomical sciences education, 12(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1777

Icekson, T., Kaplan, O., & Slobodin, O. (2020). Does optimism predict academic performance? Exploring the moderating roles of conscientiousness and gender. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564257

Idrizi, E., Filiposka, S., & Trajkovik, V. (2018, September). Character traits in online education: Case study. In S. Kalajdziski & N. Ackovska (Eds) ICT 2018: ICT Innovations 2018. Engineering and Life Sciences (pp. 247-258). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00825-3_21

Idrizi, E., & Filiposka, S. (2018). VARK learning styles and online education: Case Study. Learning, 5-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327869001_VARK_Learning_Styles_and_Online_Education_Case_Study

Ilgaz, H., & Gulbahar, Y. (2017). Why do learners choose online learning: The learners’ voices. International Association for Development of the Information Society. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579379

Kara, M., Erdoğdu, F., Kokoç, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2019). Challenges faced by adult learners in online distance education: A literature review. Open Praxis, 11(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.929

Keller, H., & Karau, S. J. (2013). The importance of personality in students’ perceptions of the online learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.007

Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education, 106, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.006

Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.019

Köseoglu, Y. (2016). To what extent can the Big Five and learning styles predict academic achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(30), 43–51. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1118920.pdf

McCarty, C., Bennett, D., & Carter, S. (2013). Teaching college microeconomics: Online vs. traditional classroom instruction. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 11. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1097170

Mirza, M. A., & Khurshid, K. (2020). Impact of VARK learning model at tertiary level education. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 14(5), 359–366. https://publications.waset.org/10011198/impact-of-vark-learning-model-at-tertiary-level-education

Nakayama, M., Mutsuura, K., & Yamamoto, H. (2017). Effectiveness of student’s note-taking activities and characteristics of their learning performance in two types of online learning. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 15(3), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.2017070104

Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2018). Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: Does gender matter? Interactive Learning Environments, 6, 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200

Page, J., Meehan-Andrews, T., Weerakkody, N., Hughes, D. L., & Rathner, J. A. (2017). Student perceptions and learning outcomes of blended learning in a massive first-year core physiology for allied health subjects. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00005.2016

Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996

Redecker, C., Leis, M., Leendertse, M., Punie, Y., Gijsbers, G., Kirschner, P., Stoyanov, S., & Hoogveld, B. (2011). The future of learning: Preparing for change. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/64117

Rice, M. F., Lowenthal, P. R., & Woodley, X. (2020). Distance education across critical theoretical landscapes: Touchstones for quality research and teaching. Distance Education, 41(3), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1790091

Sandu, M. (2019). Investigating personality traits and intelligence as predictors of academic performance and academic motivation. [Doctoral dissertation, National College of Ireland]. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Investigating-Personality-Traits-and-Intelligence-Sandu/ce27950afc1482a94d002c515994a77a4e0f99f0

Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED580852

Siemens, G., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3515.8483

Simonson, M., Zvacek, S. M., & Smaldino, S. (2019). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (7th ed.). IAP.

Stojilović, M., Filiposka, S., Krsteska, A., Vidosavljević, A., Janev, V., & Vraneš, S. (2012). Students’ perception of IT curricula and career opportunities in Serbia and Macedonia. In A. Béraud, A. S. Godfroy, & K. Michel (Eds.), GIEE 2011: Gender and Interdisciplinary Education for Engineers (pp. 241–253). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-982-4_18

Talebian, S., Mohammadi, H. M., & Rezvanfar, A. (2014). Information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education: Advantages, disadvantages, conveniences and limitations of applying e-learning to agricultural students in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.199

Tawfik, Y., Samy Eldeeb, M., & Elwy, E. (2017). Behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism paradigm for teaching and learning. University of Greenwich. http://central-library.msa.edu.eg:8009/xmlui/handle/123456789/2706

Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947

Tseng, K. C., & Chu, S. Y. (2010). Traditional versus online courses, efforts, and learning performance. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 6(1), 115–121. http://www.hraljournal.com/Page/14%20Kuang-Cheng%20Tseng.pdf

Uliaszek, A. A., Al-Dajani, N., Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2019). Cross-validation of the demoralization construct in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 31(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000655

Wu, F., & Lai, S. (2019). Linking prediction with personality traits: A learning analytics approach. Distance Education, 40(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1632170

Wu, J. Y., & Cheng, T. (2019). Who is better adapted in learning online within the personal learning environment? Relating gender differences in cognitive attention networks to digital distraction. Computers & Education, 128, 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.016

Zhang, X., Chen, G., & Xu, B. (2020). The influence of group Big-Five personality composition on student engagement in online discussion. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(10), 744–750. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.10.1452

Published
2021-02-02
How to Cite
Idrizi, E., Filiposka, S., & Trajkovijk, V. (2021). Analysis of Success Indicators in Online Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5243
Section
Research Articles