Impact of Changes in Teaching Methods During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Effect of Integrative E-Learning on Readiness for Change and Interest in Learning Among Indonesian University Students

Authors

  • Anggun Resdasari Prasetyo Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro
  • Harlina Nurtjahjanti Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro
  • Lusi Nur Ardhiani Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5143

Keywords:

integrative e-learning, change readiness, interest in learning, university student

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced universities to conduct online learning, requiring lecturers to create innovative e-learning methods and students to be ready to adapt and show high interest in learning. This study aimed to examine the effect of an integrative e-learning method on students’ readiness and interest in learning at Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia. This research was experimental, designed with one group pretest and posttest, and no control group. As many as 190 students participated, selected using clustered random sampling. Two measurement scales were used: the readiness for change scale and the interest in learning scale. The statistical analysis technique used was a paired sample t-test. The results of paired sample t-test analysis on readiness for change (p = 0.000; p < 0.05) and interest in learning (p = 0.000; p < 0.05) showed significant differences between the pretest and posttest data. The findings indicated that students who participate in integrative e-learning show significant change in the level of readiness and interest in learning.

References

Abrantes, J. L., Seabra, C., & Lages, L. F. (2007). Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 960–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.026

Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: Situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00008-1

Alqahtani, M., & Mohammad, H. (2015). Mobile applications’ impact on student performance and satisfaction. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 102–112. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i4/14410.pdf

Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). Is there an optimal design for online MBA courses. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268561

Aydin, C. H., & Tasci, D. (2005). Measuring readiness for e-learning: Reflections from an emerging country. Educational Technology and Society, 8(4), 244-257. J-ets.net/collection/published-issues/8_4

Babiker, M. E. (2015). For effective use of multimedia in education, teachers must develop their own educational multimedia applications. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 62–68. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i4/1446.pdf

Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy. W.H. Freeman and Company.

Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845949

Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of the impact of service changes on customer attitudes. Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252199

Dahiya, S., Jaggi, S., Chaturvedi, K. K., Bhardwaj, A., Goyal, R. C., & Varghese, C. (2016). An e-learning system for agricultural education. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 12(3), 132–135.

Djaali. (2013). Psikologi pendidikan [Educational psychology]. Bumi Aksara.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(5), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Flew, T. (2008). New media: An introduction. Oxford University Press.

George, A.S., & George, A.S.H. (2020). Industrial revolution 5.0: the transformation of the modern manufacturing process to enable man and machine to work hand in hand. Journal of Seybold Report, 15(9), 214-234. https://seyboldjournal.com/industrial-revolution-5-0-the-transformation-of-the-modern-manufacturing-process-to-enable-man-and-machine-to-work-hand-in-hand/

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175–191. https://ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/79

Hamalik, O. (2003). Manajemen belajar di perguruan tinggi [Learning management at higher education]. Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Hamel, G., & Välikangas. (2003, September). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 52–63. https://hbr.org/2003/09/the-quest-for-resilience

Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001

Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Field, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295

Katz, I., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2006). Interest as a motivational resource: Feedback and gender matter, but interest makes the difference. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-2863-7

Kotera, Y., Green, P., Rhodes, C., Williams, A., Chircop, J., Spink, R., Rawson, R., & Okere, U. (2020). Dealing with isolation using online morning huddles for university lecturers during physical distancing by COVID-19: Field notes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4843

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2009). Manajemen pemasaran [Marketing management]. PT Indeks.

Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management (11th ed.) Prentice Hall International.

Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1

Mohammad, H., Fayyoumi, A., & AlShathry, O. (2015). Do we have to prohibit the use of mobile phones in classrooms? International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technology, 9(2), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v9i2.4394

Nemeth, J., & Long, J. G. (2012). Assessing learning outcomes in U.S. planning studio courses. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(4), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0739456X12453740

Ozdamar-Keskin, N., Ozata, F. Z., Banar, K., & Royle, K. (2015). Examining digital literacy competences and learning habits of open and distance learners. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(1), 74–90. http://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6140

Rada, R. (2001). Understanding virtual universities. Intellect.

Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457417

Serin, H. (2017). The role of passion in learning and teaching. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 4(1), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v4i1p60

Shopova, T. (2014). Digital literacy of students and its improvement at the University. Journal of Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(2), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2014.070201

Sardiman. (2009). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar [Teaching and learning interaction and motivation]. PT Raja Grasindo Persada.

Van Brakel, P., & Chisenga, J. (2003). Impact of ICT-based distance learning: The African story. The Electronic Library, 21(5), 476–486. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470310499867

Wang, Z., & Adesope, O. (2016). Exploring the effects of seductive details with the 4-phase model of interest. Learning and Motivation, 55, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2016.06.003

Woolfolk, A. (2010). Educational psychology: Active learning edition. Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-26

How to Cite

Prasetyo, A. R. ., Nurtjahjanti, H. ., & Ardhiani, L. N. . (2021). Impact of Changes in Teaching Methods During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Effect of Integrative E-Learning on Readiness for Change and Interest in Learning Among Indonesian University Students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5143

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Research Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.

This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.

You are free to

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.