First-Generation Students in Distance Education Program: Family Resources and Academic Outcomes

Authors

  • Michael R. Brubacher University of Johannesburg
  • Fortunate T. Silinda University of South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i1.4872

Keywords:

first-generation students, distance education, social capital, academic adjustment, academic persistence

Abstract

Distance education students have less access to classmates as a social resource and may, therefore, rely more on family members for support. However, first-generation students, or students who are the first in their family to attend university, may lack the academic resources that family members can provide. Overall, first-generation students in distance education programs may be at particular risk of lacking the necessary social capital to thrive in university. This study investigated whether two family resource variables—providing guidance about university and expressing supportive attitudes toward university—varied across generation status among distance education students. The study also investigated whether these family resource variables predicted students’ academic adjustment and academic persistence. A sample of 224 undergraduate, distance education students in South Africa completed an online survey. First-generation students (n = 60) reported receiving less university guidance from family members compared to continuing-generation students. In addition, receiving university guidance predicted students’ academic adjustment. The results suggest that university guidance from family members may serve as a protective factor against potential challenges that can impact students’ academic adjustment, a protective factor that first-generation students are less likely to have.

References

Ceglie, R. J., & Settlage, J. (2016). College student persistence in scientific disciplines: Cultural and social capital as contributing factors. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9592-3

Collier, P. J., & Morgan, D. L. (2008). “Is that paper really due today?”: Differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education, 55, 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9065-5

Dennis, J. M., Phinney, J. S., & Chuateco, L. I. (2005). The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0023

Dorrance Hall, E., McNallie, J., Custers, K., Timmermans, E., Wilson, S. R., & Van den Bulck, J. (2017). A cross-cultural examination of the mediating role of family support and parental advice quality on the relationship between family communication patterns and first-year college student adjustment in the United States and Belgium. Communication Research, 44(5), 638–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216657755

El-Ghoroury, N. H., Galper, D. I., Sawaqdeh, A., & Bufka, L. F. (2012). Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028768

Feldt, R. C., Graham, M., & Dew, D. (2011). Measuring adjustment to college: Construct validity of the student adaptation to college questionnaire. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175611400291

Friedlander, L. J., Reid, G. J., Shupak, N., & Cribbie, R. (2007). Social support, self-esteem, and stress as predictors of adjustment to university among first-year undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 48(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0024

Gofen, A. (2009). Family capital: How first-generation higher education students break the intergenerational cycle. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Science, 58(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00538.x

Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42. Retrieved from https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/11.1.2.pdf

Hebert, T. P. (2018). An examination of high-achieving first-generation college students from low-income backgrounds. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738051

Irlbeck, E., Adams, S., Akers, C., Burris, S., & Jones, S. (2014). First generation college students: Motivations and support systems. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.02154

Ishitani, T. T. (2003). A longitudinal approach to assessing attrition behaviour among first-generation students: Time-varying effects of pre-college characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 44, 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024284932709

Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.867697

Kara, M., & Can, G. (2019). Master’s students’ perceptions and expectations of good tutors and advisors in distance education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.3674

Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164

Makoe, M., & Nsamba, A. (2019). The gap between student perceptions and expectations of quality support services at the University of South Africa. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(2), 132–141. /https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1583028,

Metcalf, D. A., & Wiener, K. K. K. (2018). Academic self-efficacy in a 21st-century Australian university: Strategies for first-generation students. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1472–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1484705

Mittelmeier, J., Rogaten, J., Sachikonye, M., Gunter, A., Prinsloo, P., & Rienties, B. (2019). Understanding the adjustment of first-year distance education students in South Africa: Factors that impact students’ experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4101

Mylonas, K., Bafiti, T., Poortinga, Y. H., Christakopoulou, S., Kagitcibasi, C., Kwak, K., Ataca, B., Berry, J., Orung, S., Sunar, D., Charalambous, N., Goodwin, R., Wang, W. Z., Angleitner, A., Stepanikova, I., Pick, S., Givaudan, M., Zhuravliova‐Gionis, I., Konantambigi, R., Gelfand, M. J., Marinova, V., McBride‐Chang, C., and Kodic, Y. (2001). Functional relationships in the nuclear and extended family: A 16-culture study. International Journal of Psychology, 36(5), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000045

Park, J., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.12.4.207

Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 51(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981125

Pillay, A. L., & Ngcobo, H. S. B. (2010). Sources of stress and support among rural-based first-year university students: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631004000302

Priebe, L. C., Ross, T. L., & Low, K. W. (2008). Exploring the role of distance education in fostering equitable university access for first generation students: A phenomenological survey. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i1.452

Qayyum, A., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2019). The state of open and distance education. In O. Zawacki-Richter, & A. Qayyum (Eds.), Open and distance education in Asia, Africa and the Middle East (pp. 125–140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5787-9_14

Rodriguez, M. S., Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M. F. (2017). Pre-entry characteristics, perceived social support, adjustment and academic achievement in first-year Spanish university students: A path model. Journal of Psychology, 151(8), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2017.1372351

Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: Are we failing our students? Open Learning, 28(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.847363

Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143

Wainwright, E., & Watts, M. (2021). Social mobility in the slipstream: First-generation students’ narratives of university participation and family. Educational Review, 73(1), 111–127. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566209

Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to drop-out of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i3.1659

Published

2021-03-11

How to Cite

Brubacher, M. R., & Silinda, F. T. (2021). First-Generation Students in Distance Education Program: Family Resources and Academic Outcomes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(1), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i1.4872

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
9
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
81%
33%
Days to publication 
315
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Athabasca University Press