First-Generation Students in Distance Education Program: Family Resources and Academic Outcomes
Distance education students have less access to classmates as a social resource and may, therefore, rely more on family members for support. However, first-generation students, or students who are the first in their family to attend university, may lack the academic resources that family members can provide. Overall, first-generation students in distance education programs may be at particular risk of lacking the necessary social capital to thrive in university. This study investigated whether two family resource variables—providing guidance about university and expressing supportive attitudes toward university—varied across generation status among distance education students. The study also investigated whether these family resource variables predicted students’ academic adjustment and academic persistence. A sample of 224 undergraduate, distance education students in South Africa completed an online survey. First-generation students (n = 60) reported receiving less university guidance from family members compared to continuing-generation students. In addition, receiving university guidance predicted students’ academic adjustment. The results suggest that university guidance from family members may serve as a protective factor against potential challenges that can impact students’ academic adjustment, a protective factor that first-generation students are less likely to have.
Ceglie, R. J., & Settlage, J. (2016). College student persistence in scientific disciplines: Cultural and social capital as contributing factors. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9592-3
Collier, P. J., & Morgan, D. L. (2008). “Is that paper really due today?”: Differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education, 55, 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9065-5
Dennis, J. M., Phinney, J. S., & Chuateco, L. I. (2005). The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0023
Dorrance Hall, E., McNallie, J., Custers, K., Timmermans, E., Wilson, S. R., & Van den Bulck, J. (2017). A cross-cultural examination of the mediating role of family support and parental advice quality on the relationship between family communication patterns and first-year college student adjustment in the United States and Belgium. Communication Research, 44(5), 638–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216657755
El-Ghoroury, N. H., Galper, D. I., Sawaqdeh, A., & Bufka, L. F. (2012). Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028768
Feldt, R. C., Graham, M., & Dew, D. (2011). Measuring adjustment to college: Construct validity of the student adaptation to college questionnaire. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175611400291
Friedlander, L. J., Reid, G. J., Shupak, N., & Cribbie, R. (2007). Social support, self-esteem, and stress as predictors of adjustment to university among first-year undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 48(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0024
Gofen, A. (2009). Family capital: How first-generation higher education students break the intergenerational cycle. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Science, 58(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00538.x
Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42. Retrieved from https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/11.1.2.pdf
Hebert, T. P. (2018). An examination of high-achieving first-generation college students from low-income backgrounds. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738051
Irlbeck, E., Adams, S., Akers, C., Burris, S., & Jones, S. (2014). First generation college students: Motivations and support systems. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.02154
Ishitani, T. T. (2003). A longitudinal approach to assessing attrition behaviour among first-generation students: Time-varying effects of pre-college characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 44, 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024284932709
Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.867697
Kara, M., & Can, G. (2019). Master’s students’ perceptions and expectations of good tutors and advisors in distance education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.3674
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164
Makoe, M., & Nsamba, A. (2019). The gap between student perceptions and expectations of quality support services at the University of South Africa. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(2), 132–141. /https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1583028,
Metcalf, D. A., & Wiener, K. K. K. (2018). Academic self-efficacy in a 21st-century Australian university: Strategies for first-generation students. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1472–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1484705
Mittelmeier, J., Rogaten, J., Sachikonye, M., Gunter, A., Prinsloo, P., & Rienties, B. (2019). Understanding the adjustment of first-year distance education students in South Africa: Factors that impact students’ experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4101
Mylonas, K., Bafiti, T., Poortinga, Y. H., Christakopoulou, S., Kagitcibasi, C., Kwak, K., Ataca, B., Berry, J., Orung, S., Sunar, D., Charalambous, N., Goodwin, R., Wang, W. Z., Angleitner, A., Stepanikova, I., Pick, S., Givaudan, M., Zhuravliova‐Gionis, I., Konantambigi, R., Gelfand, M. J., Marinova, V., McBride‐Chang, C., and Kodic, Y. (2001). Functional relationships in the nuclear and extended family: A 16-culture study. International Journal of Psychology, 36(5), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000045
Park, J., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.12.4.207
Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 51(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981125
Pillay, A. L., & Ngcobo, H. S. B. (2010). Sources of stress and support among rural-based first-year university students: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631004000302
Priebe, L. C., Ross, T. L., & Low, K. W. (2008). Exploring the role of distance education in fostering equitable university access for first generation students: A phenomenological survey. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i1.452
Qayyum, A., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2019). The state of open and distance education. In O. Zawacki-Richter, & A. Qayyum (Eds.), Open and distance education in Asia, Africa and the Middle East (pp. 125–140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5787-9_14
Rodriguez, M. S., Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M. F. (2017). Pre-entry characteristics, perceived social support, adjustment and academic achievement in first-year Spanish university students: A path model. Journal of Psychology, 151(8), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2017.1372351
Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: Are we failing our students? Open Learning, 28(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.847363
Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143
Wainwright, E., & Watts, M. (2021). Social mobility in the slipstream: First-generation students’ narratives of university participation and family. Educational Review, 73(1), 111–127. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566209
Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to drop-out of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i3.1659
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.