Motivation and Knowledge: Pre-Assessment and Post-Assessment of MOOC Participants From an Energy and Sustainability Project

Authors

  • Juan Antonio Valdivia Vázquez Tecnológico de Monterrey
  • María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya Tecnológico de Monterrey
  • Jaime Ricardo Valenzuela González Tecnológico de Monterrey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3489

Keywords:

MOOC assessment, exploratory factor analysis, assessment validity

Abstract

Understanding factors promoting or preventing participants’ completion of a massive open online course (MOOC) is an important research topic, as attrition rates remain high for this environment.  Motivation and digital skills have been identified as aspects promoting student engagement in a MOOC, and they are considered necessary for success.  However, evaluation of these factors has often relied on tools for which the psychometric properties have not been explored; this suggests that researchers may be working with potentially inaccurate information for judging participants’ profiles.  Through a set of analyses (t-test, exploratory factor analysis, correlation), this study explores the relationship between information collected by administering valid and reliable pre and post instruments to measure traits of MOOC attendees.  The findings from this study support previously reported outcomes concerning the strong relationships among motivation, previous knowledge, and perceived satisfaction factors for MOOC completers.  Moreover, this study provides evidence of the feasibility of developing valid assessments for evaluation purposes.

Published

2018-09-26

How to Cite

Valdivia Vázquez, J. A., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & Valenzuela González, J. R. (2018). Motivation and Knowledge: Pre-Assessment and Post-Assessment of MOOC Participants From an Energy and Sustainability Project. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3489

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
4
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
400
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Athabasca University Press