November - 2005

Technical Evaluation Report

51. Text-based Conferencing: Features vs. functionality

Lynn Anderson and Kathy McCarthy
Masters of Distance Education Programme
Athabasca University – Canada’s Open University

Abstract

This report examines three text-based conferencing products: WowBB, Invision Power Board, and vBulletin. Their selection was prompted by a feature-by-feature comparison of the same products on the WowBB website. The comparison chart painted a misleading impression of WowBB’s features in relation to the other two products; so the evaluation team undertook a more comprehensive and impartial comparison using the categories and criteria for online software evaluation developed by the American Society for Training and Development (ASTD). The findings are summarised in terms of the softwares’ pricing, common features/ functions, and differentiating features.

Introduction

Asynchronous text-based conferencing, also known as bulletin boards, provides a flexible medium for online discussion and collaboration. It is also relatively inexpensive, as it does not require a high bandwidth or extra hardware. The licensing costs of individual products vary substantially, however. Text-based conferencing software can be attained as standalone products, or as a component of a larger software application such as a learning management system. Earlier reports in this series (reports #8, #43 and #44) have argued in favour of the flexibility provided by standalone components. Unnecessarily complex, integrated software packages are described by online students as ‘bloatware,’ providing more features than are actually needed.

Product Trials

The following evaluations use the ASTD software assessment criteria: see report # 7.

1. WowBB

This product markets itself as user-friendly and fully customisable forum software. It is privately owned and operated by Aycan Gulez, who is credited on the website for the design and programming. The evaluation is based on experiences with the trial software, and information on the product website.

Cost: see comparison table (see Appendix I).

Complexity: WowBB is a very user-friendly software, intuitive, and easy to navigate. At the time of the evaluation, the product had two sub-forums for customer support and product trouble-shooting. The two forums were started in May of 2003, and by October 2005, the total of new topics started in them by customers was 1,838. This number is substantially smaller than on the help forums of the other two product websites.

Control: The board administrator has a wide range of controls, including the ability to filter unwanted words, and to ban users by IP or email address. The style editor allows changes to the appearance of the board via familiar controls such as sliders and checkboxes. The changes are previewed in real-time.

Clarity: The language used in both the bulletin board and the website is in clear, simple English. The layout of both is eye-catching, though somewhat unprofessional in appearance. Screen clutter is reduced by locating buttons and icons in pop-up menus.

Common Technical Framework: WowBB requires PHP 4.0.5 or higher, and MySQL 3.23 or higher. An Apache webserver (any version) is recommended, but any other webserver supporting PHP should work as efficiently. The product’s WYSIWYG editor requires Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher, or Mozilla/ FireFox. Users with other browsers see a standard text editor. WowBB can be integrated with a third-party chat-room called SigmaChat.

Notable Features:

Overall Comments

WowBB lives up to its promise as a user-friendly and fully customisable forum software. In spite of all the features it offers, its best feature is its simplicity. This is evident in the website forums, where topics started by customers looking for assistance over the last three and a half years is low compared to the other two bulletin boards evaluated in this report. WowBB’s second advantage is that it is substantially less expensive than the other two products. However, the price information given on the product website is vague in relation to the likely price of future major upgrades to the software.

2. Invision Power Board

Invision Power Board is a product of Invision Power Services (IPS), a site and community-building services provider based in Virginia, USA. The evaluation is based on experiences with the trial software (v 2.0), information on the product website, and information from a sales representative contacted by ‘phone.

Cost: see comparison table (see Appendix I).

Complexity: The Invision Board is cluttered, with too many options available at a time. It is not intuitive, and at times navigation is difficult. A user manual is available, though at an additional cost. The company website offers a client forum where users can get help from other users. This forum contains a large number of topics (7,905 as of October 2005) started by customers since September 2004.

Control: All passwords are encrypted when the user registers, and individual forums can be password-protected. Moderators can delete or redirect forums, and edit and delete topics while on the board. A personal control panel allows users a wide range of options for using the program. A message tracker allows tracking of any personal message sent on the board. This feature gives users the chance to delete any sent messages that have not yet been read by their intended recipient(s). Users may deny other members the ability to send them messages by entering their name in the 'block list' on the personal message control panel.

Clarity: The layout of the home board is appealing, and the use of colour, line and space very professional in appearance. The discussion boards, however, contain much white space and require extensive scrolling.

Common Technical Framework: Invision Power Board requires PHP 4.3+ and either MySQL 3.23 or higher (4.0 + recommended), MSSQL, or Oracle 9i for database storage. The product is scalable and offers a wide range of applications and site integration. IPS offers a variety of software components for addition to the product. These include Invision Gallery, Invision Blogs, and Invision Chat.

Notable Features:

Overall Comments

Invision Power Board is marketed as an effortless, intuitive, and scalable bulletin board system. The product website states that it allows its clients to effortlessly build, manage, and promote an online community. “Advanced yet intuitive features, like multi-moderation, allow you to focus on developing your community, rather than wrestling with complex settings.” Immediately under this sales pitch, the site contains a link to the Invision Power Board User’s Guide, available for purchase at $24.99 US. Ironically, this begs the question, “Why is a user guide necessary for an effortless and intuitive bulletin board system; and should the client have to pay extra for a guide that makes a purchased product functional?” Once the trial version of the software was downloaded, it quickly became evident why a client might feel motivated to pay more for the User’s Guide; for the product is saturated with features and options, and the administrator’s control panel is worse still. While some users may appreciate the flexibility offered by these multiple features and options, previous reports in this series (see reports #8 and #43) have demonstrated that the majority does not.

3. vBulletin

vBulletin is described on the product website as a forums package and a ‘community solution’ for medium to large websites. It is a product of Jelsoft Enterprises based in the UK. It should be noted that the WowBB comparison table that initiated this review referred to the features of vBulletin v 3.0. The recent release of vBulletin 3.5 was evaluated, based on a review of information provided on the product website and online manual, the installation of the administrator’s demonstration software, and a guest login on a website that uses vBulletin as its communication platform (www.sportbikers.net).

Cost: see comparison table (see Appendix I).

Complexity: The online user manual is extensive: 26 sections and six appendices with a total of 535 pages/ entries. Maneuvering the board is complex and definitely cannot be described as intuitive. For example, the admin demo requires two sets of username/ passwords for access, and was available to the evaluation team for only 24 hours, at which point a new one had to be established or a request for an extension made.

Control: Controls are available at administrator, moderator, and user levels.

Clarity: vBulletin uses a minimum of colour and other design features, and the presentation is linear.

Common Technical Framework: As with the other two programs tested, vBulletin can be run on any machine that supports PHP and MySQL. It is scalable, and its database server and webserver can reside on separate machines. Compatible operating systems include Solaris, Linux, BSD, Windows, and Mac. The product supports BB Code and HTML in posts.

Notable Features: Features offered are extensive, and the number of ‘features’ noted under 21 headings totals 100! The following are the features worth noting:

Overall Comment

vBulletin 3.5 is a feature-packed text-conferencing/ bulletin board, comparable in price to Invision Power Board 2.0. The extensive list of features does not translate into expanded functionality, however. In fact, the size limit of 19.5 kb for attachments and a 15-choice ‘user reputation ranking’ system are distracting. It would appear that the market to which vBulletin appeals is that of the technically expert and feature-needy customer.

Conclusions

Beginning as a simple comparison, this review became a full-scale evaluation of three conferencing systems. At one point in the review, the analysis became a contest between “features versus functionality.” In its eagerness to prove that they had more features than the competitors, the WowBB vendor presented a biased and inaccurate comparison table, which made an unfair comparison with an outdated version of vBulletin board, and incorrectly stated that board traffic statistics were unavailable on the Invision Power Board.

In conclusion, the reviewers offer the following commentary on the basic differences between the programs. The majority of features are common to all three systems, with varying degrees of control, automation, and customisation being the key differentiators. Since each offers an extensive list of ‘must have’ features, a potential buyer needs to conduct a time-consuming review of each product in order to make an informed selection. Unless specific features are critical, the ‘look and feel’ of the program, price, and ease with which answers to key questions can be found will likely be determining factors in a decision to purchase.

The next report in the series examines the features of high-cost audio/ videoconferencing packages

N.B. Owing to the speed with which Web addresses become outdated, online references are not cited in this report. They are available, together with updates to the current report, at the Athabasca University software evaluation site: http://cde.athabascau.ca/softeval/. Italicized product names in this report can be assumed to be registered industrial or trademarks.

JPB. Series Editor, Technical Notes

 

APPENDIX I

Comparison of the three products