Analysis of Success Indicators in Online Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5243Keywords:
online education, character traits, learning styles, academic success, genderAbstract
This article examines the impact of personality traits, learning styles, gender, and online course factors (course difficulty, group affiliation, provided materials, etc.) in the academic success of students taking online courses and their overall success rate through traditional classes. Students’ performance in the online learning environment is still a new perception, and a fair numbers of details are still unknown, in stark contrast to the details known in regard to traditional learning methods. Different types of learners respond differently to online and traditional courses. A case study was performed in which students were asked to attend two online courses, with different difficulty levels, during one semester. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine which factors are significant for the academic performance of students taking online courses, as well as for their overall academic success. Findings from the case study indicate that female students score slightly better, course difficulty has impact on test results, emotional students are more susceptible to online environments, and learning styles are more difficult to identify in online classes.
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Sloan Consortium. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529948.pdf
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital compass learning: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580868.pdf
Altanopoulou, P., & Tselios, N. (2018). Big Five personality traits and academic learning in wiki-mediated collaborative activities: Evidence from four case studies. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 16(3), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.2018070105
Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
Beer, C., Clark, K., & Jones, D. (2010). Indicators of engagement. In C. H. Steel, M. Keppell, P. Gerbic, & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology and transformation for an unknown future: Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 75–86). http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Beer-full.pdf
Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. (Eds.). (2015). MOOCs and open education around the world. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315751108
Bozkurt, A. (2019). From distance education to open and distance learning: A holistic evaluation of history, definitions, and theories. In Handbook of research on learning in the age of transhumanism (pp. 252–273). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8431-5.ch016
Clark, J. T. (2020). Distance education. In E. Iadanza (Ed.), Clinical engineering handbook (2nd ed., pp. 410–415). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813467-2.00063-8
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
Cronje, Johannes C. (2018) Learning 3.0: Rhizomatic implications for blended learning. In K. Persichitte, A. Suparman, & M. Spector (Eds.), Educational technology to improve quality and access on a global scale (pp. 9–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66227-5_2
Cuadrado-García, M., Ruiz-Molina, M. E., & Montoro-Pons, J. D. (2010). Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.027
Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-i
Davies, R. S., & West, R. E. (2018). Technology integration in schools. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 841–853). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_68
Diseth, Å. (2013). Personality as an indirect predictor of academic achievement via student course experience and approach to learning. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(8), 1297–1308. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.8.1297
Downes, S. (2020). Recent work in connectivism. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 22(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2019-0014
Essien, A. M. (2015). Effectiveness of cooperative learning methodology in improving students’ learning attitudes towards English language. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8(2), 119–127. http://www.universitypublications.net/ijas/0802/html/DE4C352.xml
Faulconer, E. K., Griffith, J. C., Wood, B. L., Acharyya, S., & Roberts, D. L. (2018). A comparison of online and traditional chemistry lecture and lab. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 392–397. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00173h
Figlio, D. N., Rush, M., & Yin, L. (2010). Is it live or is it Internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning (Working Paper 16089). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w16089
Fleming, N. D. (1987). VARK inventory. Retrieved January, 20, 2003 https://vark-learn.com/introduction-to-vark/the-vark-modalities/
Fleming, N., & Baume, D. (2006). Learning styles again: VARKing up the right tree! Educational Developments, 7(4), 4–7. https://www.vark-learn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Educational-Developments.pdf
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x
Geng, S., Law, K. M., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0
Glazier, R. A., Hamann, K., Pollock, P. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2020). Age, gender, and student success: Mixing face-to-face and online courses in political science. Journal of Political Science Education, 16(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1515636
Harvey, H. L., Parahoo, S., & Santally, M. (2017). Should gender differences be considered when assessing student satisfaction in the online learning environment for millennials? Higher Education Quarterly, 71(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12116
Henderikx, M., Kreijns, K., Castano Munoz, J., & Kalz, M. (2019). Factors influencing the pursuit of personal learning goals in MOOCs. Distance Education, 40(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600364
Howie, D. (2011). Teaching students thinking skills and strategies: A framework for cognitive education in inclusive settings. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. https://www.ibs.it/teaching-students-thinking-skills-strategies-libro-inglese- dorothy-howie/e/9781843109501
Husmann, P. R., & O’Loughlin, V. D. (2019). Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disparities among undergraduate anatomy students’ study strategies, class performance, and reported VARK learning styles. Anatomical sciences education, 12(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1777
Icekson, T., Kaplan, O., & Slobodin, O. (2020). Does optimism predict academic performance? Exploring the moderating roles of conscientiousness and gender. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564257
Idrizi, E., Filiposka, S., & Trajkovik, V. (2018, September). Character traits in online education: Case study. In S. Kalajdziski & N. Ackovska (Eds) ICT 2018: ICT Innovations 2018. Engineering and Life Sciences (pp. 247-258). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00825-3_21
Idrizi, E., & Filiposka, S. (2018). VARK learning styles and online education: Case Study. Learning, 5-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327869001_VARK_Learning_Styles_and_Online_Education_Case_Study
Ilgaz, H., & Gulbahar, Y. (2017). Why do learners choose online learning: The learners’ voices. International Association for Development of the Information Society. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579379
Kara, M., Erdoğdu, F., Kokoç, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2019). Challenges faced by adult learners in online distance education: A literature review. Open Praxis, 11(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.929
Keller, H., & Karau, S. J. (2013). The importance of personality in students’ perceptions of the online learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.007
Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education, 106, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.006
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.019
Köseoglu, Y. (2016). To what extent can the Big Five and learning styles predict academic achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(30), 43–51. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1118920.pdf
McCarty, C., Bennett, D., & Carter, S. (2013). Teaching college microeconomics: Online vs. traditional classroom instruction. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 11. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1097170
Mirza, M. A., & Khurshid, K. (2020). Impact of VARK learning model at tertiary level education. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 14(5), 359–366. https://publications.waset.org/10011198/impact-of-vark-learning-model-at-tertiary-level-education
Nakayama, M., Mutsuura, K., & Yamamoto, H. (2017). Effectiveness of student’s note-taking activities and characteristics of their learning performance in two types of online learning. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 15(3), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.2017070104
Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2018). Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: Does gender matter? Interactive Learning Environments, 6, 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200
Page, J., Meehan-Andrews, T., Weerakkody, N., Hughes, D. L., & Rathner, J. A. (2017). Student perceptions and learning outcomes of blended learning in a massive first-year core physiology for allied health subjects. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00005.2016
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
Redecker, C., Leis, M., Leendertse, M., Punie, Y., Gijsbers, G., Kirschner, P., Stoyanov, S., & Hoogveld, B. (2011). The future of learning: Preparing for change. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/64117
Rice, M. F., Lowenthal, P. R., & Woodley, X. (2020). Distance education across critical theoretical landscapes: Touchstones for quality research and teaching. Distance Education, 41(3), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1790091
Sandu, M. (2019). Investigating personality traits and intelligence as predictors of academic performance and academic motivation. [Doctoral dissertation, National College of Ireland]. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Investigating-Personality-Traits-and-Intelligence-Sandu/ce27950afc1482a94d002c515994a77a4e0f99f0
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED580852
Siemens, G., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3515.8483
Simonson, M., Zvacek, S. M., & Smaldino, S. (2019). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (7th ed.). IAP.
Stojilović, M., Filiposka, S., Krsteska, A., Vidosavljević, A., Janev, V., & Vraneš, S. (2012). Students’ perception of IT curricula and career opportunities in Serbia and Macedonia. In A. Béraud, A. S. Godfroy, & K. Michel (Eds.), GIEE 2011: Gender and Interdisciplinary Education for Engineers (pp. 241–253). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-982-4_18
Talebian, S., Mohammadi, H. M., & Rezvanfar, A. (2014). Information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education: Advantages, disadvantages, conveniences and limitations of applying e-learning to agricultural students in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.199
Tawfik, Y., Samy Eldeeb, M., & Elwy, E. (2017). Behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism paradigm for teaching and learning. University of Greenwich. http://central-library.msa.edu.eg:8009/xmlui/handle/123456789/2706
Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947
Tseng, K. C., & Chu, S. Y. (2010). Traditional versus online courses, efforts, and learning performance. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 6(1), 115–121. http://www.hraljournal.com/Page/14%20Kuang-Cheng%20Tseng.pdf
Uliaszek, A. A., Al-Dajani, N., Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2019). Cross-validation of the demoralization construct in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 31(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000655
Wu, F., & Lai, S. (2019). Linking prediction with personality traits: A learning analytics approach. Distance Education, 40(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1632170
Wu, J. Y., & Cheng, T. (2019). Who is better adapted in learning online within the personal learning environment? Relating gender differences in cognitive attention networks to digital distraction. Computers & Education, 128, 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.016
Zhang, X., Chen, G., & Xu, B. (2020). The influence of group Big-Five personality composition on student engagement in online discussion. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(10), 744–750. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.10.1452
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
