Faculty and Student Technology Use to Enhance Student Learning
Scholarly research has indicated that technology adoption to facilitate blended learning promotes the academic success of many different types of students and improves the quality of existing educational offerings. To understand how technology enhances learning, surveys queried the faculty and students of a statewide community college system. The results indicated widespread technology use among the faculty and students. The faculty survey revealed details of technology tools employed and the motivations for their use or discontinued use. Details regarding faculty use of learning management systems, textbooks, and other media characterized the current technology adoption climate. The student survey collected information about students’ perceptions of how technology influenced their learning, their preferences for specific technology tools, and their student progress. Ninety-three percent of student respondents indicated that technology enhanced their learning. Alignment between the faculty use and student preference for technology tools suggested that students are actively engaged in the technology resources used by faculty to enhance learning. Students described how technology facilitated multimodal learning. They also noted that technology increased communication, access, and inclusion in learning. Successful technology use and integration, accompanied by ongoing scholarly debate and monitoring, has the potential to provide more access, promote learning outcomes, and preserve the investment of technology for the institution. The surveys employed here, when used semi-annually, may provide a low-cost model for technology integration monitoring and evaluation. The responses to the surveys also have the potential to provide technology use and integration data that informs strategic planning processes and institutional learning outcome development.
Abdulwahed, M., Jaworski, B., & Crawford, A. R. (2012). Innovative approaches to teaching mathematics in higher education: a review and critique. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 49–68. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2134/11988
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. n.p.: Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/survey_report/changing-course-ten-years-tracking-online-education-united-states/
Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Online Learning Consortium. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/online-report-card-tracking-online-education-united-states-2015/
Butler-Pascoe, M. E. (2011). The history of CALL: The intertwining paths of technology and second/foreign language teaching. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 16–32. doi:10.4018/ijcallt.2011010102
Cheng, A., Lang, T. R., Starr, S. R., Pusic, M., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Technology-enhanced simulation and pediatric education: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 133(5), e1313–e1323. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2139
Colorado Mountain College. (2014). Strategic plan (2014–2018). Retrieved from http://coloradomtn.edu/wp-content/uploads/filebase/2014%20StrategicPlan%20onepage-2-27-14.pdf
Colorado Mountain College: CMC Facts. (2016). Retrieved from https://coloradomtn.edu/contact-departments/institutional-research/cmc-facts/
Colorado Mountain College: Snapshot. (2016). Retrieved from http://coloradomtn.edu/about-cmc/cmc_snapshot/
Courts, B., & Tucker, J. (2012). Using technology to create a dynamic classroom experience. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(2), 121–128. doi:10.19030/tlc.v9i2.6907
Crall, A. W., Newman, G. J., Jarnevich, C. S., Stohlgren, T. J., Waller, D. M., & Graham, J. (2010). Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists. Biological Invasions, 12(10), 3419–3428. doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9740-9
Gaddis, M. L. (2018). Training citizen scientists for data reliability: A multiple case study to identify themes in current training initiatives (Doctoral dissertation Order No. 13423764). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2159515806).
Gagnon, J., Gagnon, M. P., Buteau, R. A., Azizah, G. M., Jette, S., Lampron, A., . . . Reviriego, E. (2015). Adaptation and evaluation of online self-learning modules to teach critical appraisal and evidence-based practice in nursing: An international collaboration. Computers Informatics Nursing, 33(7), 285–294. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000156
Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. (3rd ed.) New York, NY: Routledge.
Johnson, L., Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC horizon report: 2014 higher education. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/130341/
Johnson, T., Wisniewski, M. A., Kuhlemeyer, G., Isaacs, G., & Kryzkowski, J. (2012). Technology adoption in higher education: Overcoming anxiety through faculty bootcamp. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 63–72. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/132464/
Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Onchwari, J. (2009). Technology and student learning: Towards a learner-centered teaching model. AACE Journal, 17(1), 11–22. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/26258/
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2011). The adult learner (7th ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Lancaster, J. R., & Lundberg, C. A. (2019). The influence of classroom engagement on community college student learning: A quantitative analysis of effective faculty practices. Community College Review, 47(2), 136–158. doi:10.1177/0091552119835922
Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lertwanasiriwan, C. (2010). The effects of a technology-enhanced inquiry instructional model on students’ understanding of science in Thailand (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/18445/lertwanasiriwanc79440.pdf?sequence=2
Lewis, C. C., Fretwell, C. E., Ryan, J., & Parham, J. B. (2013). Faculty use of established and emerging technologies in higher education: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology perspective. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 22–34. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p22
Mbati, L., & Minnaar, A. (2015). Guidelines towards the facilitation of interactive online learning programmes in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2019
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. doi:10.1007/BF02505024
Moule P., Ward R., & Lockyer L. (2011). Issues with e-learning in nursing and health education in the UK: Are new technologies being embraced in the teaching and learning environments? Journal of Research in Nursing, 16, 77–90. doi:10.1177/1744987110370940
Potocka, K. (2010). An entirely-online developmental mathematics course: Creation and outcomes. Primus, 20(6), 498-516. doi:10.1080/10511970802398151
Quillerou, E. (2011). Increased technology provision and learning: Giving more for nothing? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.998
Roney, L. N., Westrick, S. J., Acri, M. C., Aronson, B. S., & Rebeschi, L. M. (2017). Technology use and technological self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing faculty. Nursing Education Perspectives, 38(3), 113–118. doi:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000141
Russell, S. M. (2014). Technology integration for technical and vocational faculty in North Carolina community colleges (Doctoral dissertation Order No. 3586198). Available from Proquest Dissertations. (1513578313).
Serna, R. W., Foran, M. M., Cooke, C., Hurd, K. E., Tello, A. J., Vangapalli, R., & Hamad, C. D. (2016). Teaching discrete trial training: The effects of asynchronous computer-based instruction on live implementation. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(4). doi:10.1177/0162643416633334
Simkins, M. (2002). Increasing student learning through multimedia projects. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778
Zucker, A. A., & Light, D. (2009). Laptop programs for students. Science, 323(5910), 82–85. doi:10.1126/science.1167705
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.